How the more life discourse constrains end-of-life conversations in the primary care of medically frail older adults: A critical ethnography

There is growing emphasis for primary care clinicians to initiate and engage in end-of-life (EOL) conversations with medically frail older adults. However, EOL conversations happen most often when death is imminent or are avoided altogether. The objective of this study was to understand the socio-po...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Celina Carter, Shan Mohammed, Ross Upshur, Pia Kontos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-12-01
Series:SSM: Qualitative Research in Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321522001366
_version_ 1811199191543709696
author Celina Carter
Shan Mohammed
Ross Upshur
Pia Kontos
author_facet Celina Carter
Shan Mohammed
Ross Upshur
Pia Kontos
author_sort Celina Carter
collection DOAJ
description There is growing emphasis for primary care clinicians to initiate and engage in end-of-life (EOL) conversations with medically frail older adults. However, EOL conversations happen most often when death is imminent or are avoided altogether. The objective of this study was to understand the socio-political forces shaping EOL conversations between clinicians, medically frail older adults and/or their care partners within an urban primary care setting, a Family Health Team in Ontario, Canada. We conducted an eight-month critical ethnography in 2019 involving observations and interviews of clinicians, patients, and care partners (n ​= ​35). Analyzing this data for discourses and power-knowledge systems we found that two discourses, frailty and more life shape EOL conversations in this setting. More life discourse disrupts EOL conversations by making it more difficult to talk about decline and dying as well as personal goals. Biomedicine and clinical practice guidelines comprised the two major power-knowledge systems that increase the influence of more life in this setting as well as the norm of seeking longevity. Improving EOL conversations is complex and requires addressing the power-knowledge systems that perpetuate more life as well as a discursive shift towards prioritizing relationships and people's life worlds. Primary care as a specialty can critically reflect on the ways it is entrenched in a culture of care that valorizes more life and (re)create clinical practice guidelines and evaluations to align with person-centredness more meaningfully. Future research should involve patients, care-partners, and interprofessional clinicians to co-create approaches to care that can better accommodate frailty talk.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T01:43:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4be8c70fe689499d97d74a1c436158d3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2667-3215
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T01:43:51Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series SSM: Qualitative Research in Health
spelling doaj.art-4be8c70fe689499d97d74a1c436158d32022-12-22T03:53:07ZengElsevierSSM: Qualitative Research in Health2667-32152022-12-012100174How the more life discourse constrains end-of-life conversations in the primary care of medically frail older adults: A critical ethnographyCelina Carter0Shan Mohammed1Ross Upshur2Pia Kontos3Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 550 College St, Toronto, ON, M6G 1B1, Canada; Corresponding author.Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, CanadaDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 550 College St, Toronto, ON, M6G 1B1, CanadaDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 550 College St, Toronto, ON, M6G 1B1, Canada; KITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, CanadaThere is growing emphasis for primary care clinicians to initiate and engage in end-of-life (EOL) conversations with medically frail older adults. However, EOL conversations happen most often when death is imminent or are avoided altogether. The objective of this study was to understand the socio-political forces shaping EOL conversations between clinicians, medically frail older adults and/or their care partners within an urban primary care setting, a Family Health Team in Ontario, Canada. We conducted an eight-month critical ethnography in 2019 involving observations and interviews of clinicians, patients, and care partners (n ​= ​35). Analyzing this data for discourses and power-knowledge systems we found that two discourses, frailty and more life shape EOL conversations in this setting. More life discourse disrupts EOL conversations by making it more difficult to talk about decline and dying as well as personal goals. Biomedicine and clinical practice guidelines comprised the two major power-knowledge systems that increase the influence of more life in this setting as well as the norm of seeking longevity. Improving EOL conversations is complex and requires addressing the power-knowledge systems that perpetuate more life as well as a discursive shift towards prioritizing relationships and people's life worlds. Primary care as a specialty can critically reflect on the ways it is entrenched in a culture of care that valorizes more life and (re)create clinical practice guidelines and evaluations to align with person-centredness more meaningfully. Future research should involve patients, care-partners, and interprofessional clinicians to co-create approaches to care that can better accommodate frailty talk.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321522001366BiomedicalizationFrailtyDiscoursePrimary careEnd-of-life conversationsAdvance care planning
spellingShingle Celina Carter
Shan Mohammed
Ross Upshur
Pia Kontos
How the more life discourse constrains end-of-life conversations in the primary care of medically frail older adults: A critical ethnography
SSM: Qualitative Research in Health
Biomedicalization
Frailty
Discourse
Primary care
End-of-life conversations
Advance care planning
title How the more life discourse constrains end-of-life conversations in the primary care of medically frail older adults: A critical ethnography
title_full How the more life discourse constrains end-of-life conversations in the primary care of medically frail older adults: A critical ethnography
title_fullStr How the more life discourse constrains end-of-life conversations in the primary care of medically frail older adults: A critical ethnography
title_full_unstemmed How the more life discourse constrains end-of-life conversations in the primary care of medically frail older adults: A critical ethnography
title_short How the more life discourse constrains end-of-life conversations in the primary care of medically frail older adults: A critical ethnography
title_sort how the more life discourse constrains end of life conversations in the primary care of medically frail older adults a critical ethnography
topic Biomedicalization
Frailty
Discourse
Primary care
End-of-life conversations
Advance care planning
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321522001366
work_keys_str_mv AT celinacarter howthemorelifediscourseconstrainsendoflifeconversationsintheprimarycareofmedicallyfrailolderadultsacriticalethnography
AT shanmohammed howthemorelifediscourseconstrainsendoflifeconversationsintheprimarycareofmedicallyfrailolderadultsacriticalethnography
AT rossupshur howthemorelifediscourseconstrainsendoflifeconversationsintheprimarycareofmedicallyfrailolderadultsacriticalethnography
AT piakontos howthemorelifediscourseconstrainsendoflifeconversationsintheprimarycareofmedicallyfrailolderadultsacriticalethnography