Developmental Stuttering Screening Instrument: development and content validation
ABSTRACT Purpose: to develop a screening instrument to identify the risk of developmental stuttering in preschoolers. Methods: the procedures were divided into two stages: The first one (theoretical), consisted of the literature review and the construction of the items that make up the instrument;...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
CEFAC Saúde e Educação
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Revista CEFAC |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462021000100504&tlng=en |
_version_ | 1798019555224715264 |
---|---|
author | Mayra Maria Oliveira de Lima Ana Augusta de Andrade Cordeiro Bianca Arruda Manchester de Queiroga |
author_facet | Mayra Maria Oliveira de Lima Ana Augusta de Andrade Cordeiro Bianca Arruda Manchester de Queiroga |
author_sort | Mayra Maria Oliveira de Lima |
collection | DOAJ |
description | ABSTRACT Purpose: to develop a screening instrument to identify the risk of developmental stuttering in preschoolers. Methods: the procedures were divided into two stages: The first one (theoretical), consisted of the literature review and the construction of the items that make up the instrument; the second stage (content validation), consisted of the analysis of the instrument by a judging committee formed by 10 speech-language-hearing therapists who work in the field of fluency. The data analysis was based on the calculation of the item content validity index (I-CVI) and the total number of answers (T-CVI). Also, an item reliability analysis was conducted with Cronbach’s alpha. Results: the Developmental Stuttering Screening Instrument (DSSI) encompassed 24 items distributed into four key categories. The I-CVI and T-CVI revealed a high agreement between the judges. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients indicated a high internal consistency between the judges’ answers in 19 of the 24 items. The qualitative analysis pointed to the need for new adjustments. All the analyses contributed to the construction of the second version of the instrument. Conclusion: the proposed instrument showed content-based validity evidence that made it possible, up to the present moment, to adjust it to its construct. It is suggested that the validation process continue, employing new accuracy measures. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T16:41:27Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-4befd791e641477faa6985d132502da7 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1982-0216 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T16:41:27Z |
publishDate | 2020-12-01 |
publisher | CEFAC Saúde e Educação |
record_format | Article |
series | Revista CEFAC |
spelling | doaj.art-4befd791e641477faa6985d132502da72022-12-22T04:13:39ZengCEFAC Saúde e EducaçãoRevista CEFAC1982-02162020-12-0123110.1590/1982-0216/20212319520Developmental Stuttering Screening Instrument: development and content validationMayra Maria Oliveira de Limahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3495-7287Ana Augusta de Andrade Cordeirohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8458-3367Bianca Arruda Manchester de Queirogahttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5081-924XABSTRACT Purpose: to develop a screening instrument to identify the risk of developmental stuttering in preschoolers. Methods: the procedures were divided into two stages: The first one (theoretical), consisted of the literature review and the construction of the items that make up the instrument; the second stage (content validation), consisted of the analysis of the instrument by a judging committee formed by 10 speech-language-hearing therapists who work in the field of fluency. The data analysis was based on the calculation of the item content validity index (I-CVI) and the total number of answers (T-CVI). Also, an item reliability analysis was conducted with Cronbach’s alpha. Results: the Developmental Stuttering Screening Instrument (DSSI) encompassed 24 items distributed into four key categories. The I-CVI and T-CVI revealed a high agreement between the judges. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients indicated a high internal consistency between the judges’ answers in 19 of the 24 items. The qualitative analysis pointed to the need for new adjustments. All the analyses contributed to the construction of the second version of the instrument. Conclusion: the proposed instrument showed content-based validity evidence that made it possible, up to the present moment, to adjust it to its construct. It is suggested that the validation process continue, employing new accuracy measures.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462021000100504&tlng=enStutteringChild, PreschoolMass ScreeningValidation Study |
spellingShingle | Mayra Maria Oliveira de Lima Ana Augusta de Andrade Cordeiro Bianca Arruda Manchester de Queiroga Developmental Stuttering Screening Instrument: development and content validation Revista CEFAC Stuttering Child, Preschool Mass Screening Validation Study |
title | Developmental Stuttering Screening Instrument: development and content validation |
title_full | Developmental Stuttering Screening Instrument: development and content validation |
title_fullStr | Developmental Stuttering Screening Instrument: development and content validation |
title_full_unstemmed | Developmental Stuttering Screening Instrument: development and content validation |
title_short | Developmental Stuttering Screening Instrument: development and content validation |
title_sort | developmental stuttering screening instrument development and content validation |
topic | Stuttering Child, Preschool Mass Screening Validation Study |
url | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462021000100504&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mayramariaoliveiradelima developmentalstutteringscreeninginstrumentdevelopmentandcontentvalidation AT anaaugustadeandradecordeiro developmentalstutteringscreeninginstrumentdevelopmentandcontentvalidation AT biancaarrudamanchesterdequeiroga developmentalstutteringscreeninginstrumentdevelopmentandcontentvalidation |