A prospective study to assess the efficacy of 4% articaine, 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lignocaine using a single buccal supraperiosteal injection for maxillary tooth extraction
Introduction: The aim of this study was to demonstrate if articaine hydrochloride administered alone as a single buccal infiltration in maxillary tooth extraction can provide adequate palatal anesthesia as compared to buccal and palatal injection using lidocaine and bupivacaine. Materials and Method...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2021-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=5;spage=721;epage=724;aulast=Chandrasekaran |
| _version_ | 1818669788178677760 |
|---|---|
| author | Deepak Chandrasekaran Ravindran Chinnaswami K Shanthi A Emmanuel Dhiravia Sargunam K Santhosh Kumar Tharini Satheesh |
| author_facet | Deepak Chandrasekaran Ravindran Chinnaswami K Shanthi A Emmanuel Dhiravia Sargunam K Santhosh Kumar Tharini Satheesh |
| author_sort | Deepak Chandrasekaran |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Introduction: The aim of this study was to demonstrate if articaine hydrochloride administered alone as a single buccal infiltration in maxillary tooth extraction can provide adequate palatal anesthesia as compared to buccal and palatal injection using lidocaine and bupivacaine. Materials and Methods: A prospective double-blinded trial was conducted on 150 patients who required maxillary tooth extraction. The patients were divided into three different groups consisting of 50 patients each. Each group was administered with 4% articaine into buccal vestibular mucosa of the tooth to be extracted, 2% lignocaine and 0.5% bupivacaine was injected into buccal and palatal side of the tooth to be extracted, respectively. Following the tooth extraction, all patients were asked to complete a 10-score Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and 5-score facial pain scale (FPS) to assess the pain on extraction. Results: According to the VAS and FPS scores, the pain on extraction between buccal infiltration of articaine and the routine buccal and palatal infiltration of lignocaine was statistically significant. Conclusion: The routine use of a palatal injection for extraction of maxillary teeth may not be required when articaine is used as a local anesthetic solution. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-17T06:57:46Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-4bf749f15f7b45ab8b86acfc1d44a482 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0975-7406 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-17T06:57:46Z |
| publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
| spelling | doaj.art-4bf749f15f7b45ab8b86acfc1d44a4822022-12-21T21:59:23ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0975-74062021-01-0113572172410.4103/jpbs.JPBS_659_20A prospective study to assess the efficacy of 4% articaine, 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lignocaine using a single buccal supraperiosteal injection for maxillary tooth extractionDeepak ChandrasekaranRavindran ChinnaswamiK ShanthiA Emmanuel Dhiravia SargunamK Santhosh KumarTharini SatheeshIntroduction: The aim of this study was to demonstrate if articaine hydrochloride administered alone as a single buccal infiltration in maxillary tooth extraction can provide adequate palatal anesthesia as compared to buccal and palatal injection using lidocaine and bupivacaine. Materials and Methods: A prospective double-blinded trial was conducted on 150 patients who required maxillary tooth extraction. The patients were divided into three different groups consisting of 50 patients each. Each group was administered with 4% articaine into buccal vestibular mucosa of the tooth to be extracted, 2% lignocaine and 0.5% bupivacaine was injected into buccal and palatal side of the tooth to be extracted, respectively. Following the tooth extraction, all patients were asked to complete a 10-score Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and 5-score facial pain scale (FPS) to assess the pain on extraction. Results: According to the VAS and FPS scores, the pain on extraction between buccal infiltration of articaine and the routine buccal and palatal infiltration of lignocaine was statistically significant. Conclusion: The routine use of a palatal injection for extraction of maxillary teeth may not be required when articaine is used as a local anesthetic solution.http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=5;spage=721;epage=724;aulast=Chandrasekaranarticainelocal infiltrationtooth extraction |
| spellingShingle | Deepak Chandrasekaran Ravindran Chinnaswami K Shanthi A Emmanuel Dhiravia Sargunam K Santhosh Kumar Tharini Satheesh A prospective study to assess the efficacy of 4% articaine, 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lignocaine using a single buccal supraperiosteal injection for maxillary tooth extraction Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences articaine local infiltration tooth extraction |
| title | A prospective study to assess the efficacy of 4% articaine, 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lignocaine using a single buccal supraperiosteal injection for maxillary tooth extraction |
| title_full | A prospective study to assess the efficacy of 4% articaine, 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lignocaine using a single buccal supraperiosteal injection for maxillary tooth extraction |
| title_fullStr | A prospective study to assess the efficacy of 4% articaine, 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lignocaine using a single buccal supraperiosteal injection for maxillary tooth extraction |
| title_full_unstemmed | A prospective study to assess the efficacy of 4% articaine, 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lignocaine using a single buccal supraperiosteal injection for maxillary tooth extraction |
| title_short | A prospective study to assess the efficacy of 4% articaine, 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lignocaine using a single buccal supraperiosteal injection for maxillary tooth extraction |
| title_sort | prospective study to assess the efficacy of 4 articaine 0 5 bupivacaine and 2 lignocaine using a single buccal supraperiosteal injection for maxillary tooth extraction |
| topic | articaine local infiltration tooth extraction |
| url | http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=5;spage=721;epage=724;aulast=Chandrasekaran |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT deepakchandrasekaran aprospectivestudytoassesstheefficacyof4articaine05bupivacaineand2lignocaineusingasinglebuccalsupraperiostealinjectionformaxillarytoothextraction AT ravindranchinnaswami aprospectivestudytoassesstheefficacyof4articaine05bupivacaineand2lignocaineusingasinglebuccalsupraperiostealinjectionformaxillarytoothextraction AT kshanthi aprospectivestudytoassesstheefficacyof4articaine05bupivacaineand2lignocaineusingasinglebuccalsupraperiostealinjectionformaxillarytoothextraction AT aemmanueldhiraviasargunam aprospectivestudytoassesstheefficacyof4articaine05bupivacaineand2lignocaineusingasinglebuccalsupraperiostealinjectionformaxillarytoothextraction AT ksanthoshkumar aprospectivestudytoassesstheefficacyof4articaine05bupivacaineand2lignocaineusingasinglebuccalsupraperiostealinjectionformaxillarytoothextraction AT tharinisatheesh aprospectivestudytoassesstheefficacyof4articaine05bupivacaineand2lignocaineusingasinglebuccalsupraperiostealinjectionformaxillarytoothextraction AT deepakchandrasekaran prospectivestudytoassesstheefficacyof4articaine05bupivacaineand2lignocaineusingasinglebuccalsupraperiostealinjectionformaxillarytoothextraction AT ravindranchinnaswami prospectivestudytoassesstheefficacyof4articaine05bupivacaineand2lignocaineusingasinglebuccalsupraperiostealinjectionformaxillarytoothextraction AT kshanthi prospectivestudytoassesstheefficacyof4articaine05bupivacaineand2lignocaineusingasinglebuccalsupraperiostealinjectionformaxillarytoothextraction AT aemmanueldhiraviasargunam prospectivestudytoassesstheefficacyof4articaine05bupivacaineand2lignocaineusingasinglebuccalsupraperiostealinjectionformaxillarytoothextraction AT ksanthoshkumar prospectivestudytoassesstheefficacyof4articaine05bupivacaineand2lignocaineusingasinglebuccalsupraperiostealinjectionformaxillarytoothextraction AT tharinisatheesh prospectivestudytoassesstheefficacyof4articaine05bupivacaineand2lignocaineusingasinglebuccalsupraperiostealinjectionformaxillarytoothextraction |