Avoid jumping to conclusions under uncertainty in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder.

High levels of intolerance of uncertainty (IU) could contribute to abnormal decision making in uncertain situations. Patients with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) often report high IU, indecisiveness and the need to seek greater certainty before making decisions. The Beads task is a commonly use...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sharon Morein-Zamir, Sonia Shapher, Julia Gasull-Camos, Naomi A Fineberg, Trevor W Robbins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225970
_version_ 1818575543212179456
author Sharon Morein-Zamir
Sonia Shapher
Julia Gasull-Camos
Naomi A Fineberg
Trevor W Robbins
author_facet Sharon Morein-Zamir
Sonia Shapher
Julia Gasull-Camos
Naomi A Fineberg
Trevor W Robbins
author_sort Sharon Morein-Zamir
collection DOAJ
description High levels of intolerance of uncertainty (IU) could contribute to abnormal decision making in uncertain situations. Patients with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) often report high IU, indecisiveness and the need to seek greater certainty before making decisions. The Beads task is a commonly used task assessing the degree of information gathering prior to making a decision and so would be predicted to show impairments in OCD patients. Results to date have found mixed support for this, possibility due to methodological issues. Here, a group of OCD patients (n = 50) with no comorbidities was compared with age, gender, and verbal-IQ matched controls (n = 50) on the most commonly used version of the Beads task. An independent sample of healthy volunteers with high versus low OC symptoms, and high versus low IU were also assessed (n = 125). There was no evidence that patients with OCD differed from control volunteers in the degree of information gathering prior to making a decision. Medication status and age did not appear to mediate performance. Similarly, there were no association in healthy volunteers between task performance and OC or IU characteristics. Additional measures examining the degree of certainty initially showed support for greater uncertainty in patients, but this was due to deviations from task instructions in a subset of patients. We conclude that despite the large sample size and good matching between groups, the Beads task in its most widely used form is not a useful measure of IU or of information gathering in OCD. The results argue against a robust behavioural difference in OCD when compared to controls. Recommendations for future studies employing the task are discussed.
first_indexed 2024-12-15T00:41:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4bf9a20dc4b4439d85ce4501e2827a9c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-15T00:41:40Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-4bf9a20dc4b4439d85ce4501e2827a9c2022-12-21T22:41:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01151e022597010.1371/journal.pone.0225970Avoid jumping to conclusions under uncertainty in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder.Sharon Morein-ZamirSonia ShapherJulia Gasull-CamosNaomi A FinebergTrevor W RobbinsHigh levels of intolerance of uncertainty (IU) could contribute to abnormal decision making in uncertain situations. Patients with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) often report high IU, indecisiveness and the need to seek greater certainty before making decisions. The Beads task is a commonly used task assessing the degree of information gathering prior to making a decision and so would be predicted to show impairments in OCD patients. Results to date have found mixed support for this, possibility due to methodological issues. Here, a group of OCD patients (n = 50) with no comorbidities was compared with age, gender, and verbal-IQ matched controls (n = 50) on the most commonly used version of the Beads task. An independent sample of healthy volunteers with high versus low OC symptoms, and high versus low IU were also assessed (n = 125). There was no evidence that patients with OCD differed from control volunteers in the degree of information gathering prior to making a decision. Medication status and age did not appear to mediate performance. Similarly, there were no association in healthy volunteers between task performance and OC or IU characteristics. Additional measures examining the degree of certainty initially showed support for greater uncertainty in patients, but this was due to deviations from task instructions in a subset of patients. We conclude that despite the large sample size and good matching between groups, the Beads task in its most widely used form is not a useful measure of IU or of information gathering in OCD. The results argue against a robust behavioural difference in OCD when compared to controls. Recommendations for future studies employing the task are discussed.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225970
spellingShingle Sharon Morein-Zamir
Sonia Shapher
Julia Gasull-Camos
Naomi A Fineberg
Trevor W Robbins
Avoid jumping to conclusions under uncertainty in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder.
PLoS ONE
title Avoid jumping to conclusions under uncertainty in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder.
title_full Avoid jumping to conclusions under uncertainty in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder.
title_fullStr Avoid jumping to conclusions under uncertainty in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder.
title_full_unstemmed Avoid jumping to conclusions under uncertainty in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder.
title_short Avoid jumping to conclusions under uncertainty in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder.
title_sort avoid jumping to conclusions under uncertainty in obsessive compulsive disorder
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225970
work_keys_str_mv AT sharonmoreinzamir avoidjumpingtoconclusionsunderuncertaintyinobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT soniashapher avoidjumpingtoconclusionsunderuncertaintyinobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT juliagasullcamos avoidjumpingtoconclusionsunderuncertaintyinobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT naomiafineberg avoidjumpingtoconclusionsunderuncertaintyinobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT trevorwrobbins avoidjumpingtoconclusionsunderuncertaintyinobsessivecompulsivedisorder