Psychological intimate partner violence against women in the European Union: a cross-national invariance study

Abstract Background Intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) is a worldwide public health problem. One of the most frequent forms of this type of violence in western societies is psychological IPVAW. According to the European Union (EU) Fundamental Rights Association (FRA) the prevalence of p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manuel Martín-Fernández, Enrique Gracia, Marisol Lila
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-12-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7998-0
_version_ 1818920423996260352
author Manuel Martín-Fernández
Enrique Gracia
Marisol Lila
author_facet Manuel Martín-Fernández
Enrique Gracia
Marisol Lila
author_sort Manuel Martín-Fernández
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) is a worldwide public health problem. One of the most frequent forms of this type of violence in western societies is psychological IPVAW. According to the European Union (EU) Fundamental Rights Association (FRA) the prevalence of psychological IPVAW in the EU is 43%. However, the measurement invariance of the measure addressing psychological IPVAW in this survey has not yet been assessed. Methods The aim of this study is to ensure the cross-national comparability of this measure, by evaluating its measurement invariance across the 28 EU countries in a sample of 37,724 women, and to examine how the levels of this type of violence are distributed across the EU. Results Our results showed that the psychological IPVAW measure presented adequate psychometric properties (reliability and validity) in all countries. A latent structure of one factor was supported and scalar invariance was established in all countries. The average levels of psychological IPVAW were higher in countries like Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, and Sweden compared to the rest of the EU countries. In many of the other countries the levels of this type of violence overlapped. Conclusion Our findings underlined the importance of using appropriate statistical methods to make valid cross-national comparisons in large population surveys.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T01:21:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4c0531647f9946a7800c88418379ed98
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2458
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T01:21:31Z
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj.art-4c0531647f9946a7800c88418379ed982022-12-21T19:58:25ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582019-12-0119111110.1186/s12889-019-7998-0Psychological intimate partner violence against women in the European Union: a cross-national invariance studyManuel Martín-Fernández0Enrique Gracia1Marisol Lila2Department of Social Psychology, University of ValenciaDepartment of Social Psychology, University of ValenciaDepartment of Social Psychology, University of ValenciaAbstract Background Intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) is a worldwide public health problem. One of the most frequent forms of this type of violence in western societies is psychological IPVAW. According to the European Union (EU) Fundamental Rights Association (FRA) the prevalence of psychological IPVAW in the EU is 43%. However, the measurement invariance of the measure addressing psychological IPVAW in this survey has not yet been assessed. Methods The aim of this study is to ensure the cross-national comparability of this measure, by evaluating its measurement invariance across the 28 EU countries in a sample of 37,724 women, and to examine how the levels of this type of violence are distributed across the EU. Results Our results showed that the psychological IPVAW measure presented adequate psychometric properties (reliability and validity) in all countries. A latent structure of one factor was supported and scalar invariance was established in all countries. The average levels of psychological IPVAW were higher in countries like Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, and Sweden compared to the rest of the EU countries. In many of the other countries the levels of this type of violence overlapped. Conclusion Our findings underlined the importance of using appropriate statistical methods to make valid cross-national comparisons in large population surveys.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7998-0Intimate partner violencePsychological violenceEmotional abuseControlling behaviorMeasurement invarianceCross-national research
spellingShingle Manuel Martín-Fernández
Enrique Gracia
Marisol Lila
Psychological intimate partner violence against women in the European Union: a cross-national invariance study
BMC Public Health
Intimate partner violence
Psychological violence
Emotional abuse
Controlling behavior
Measurement invariance
Cross-national research
title Psychological intimate partner violence against women in the European Union: a cross-national invariance study
title_full Psychological intimate partner violence against women in the European Union: a cross-national invariance study
title_fullStr Psychological intimate partner violence against women in the European Union: a cross-national invariance study
title_full_unstemmed Psychological intimate partner violence against women in the European Union: a cross-national invariance study
title_short Psychological intimate partner violence against women in the European Union: a cross-national invariance study
title_sort psychological intimate partner violence against women in the european union a cross national invariance study
topic Intimate partner violence
Psychological violence
Emotional abuse
Controlling behavior
Measurement invariance
Cross-national research
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7998-0
work_keys_str_mv AT manuelmartinfernandez psychologicalintimatepartnerviolenceagainstwomenintheeuropeanunionacrossnationalinvariancestudy
AT enriquegracia psychologicalintimatepartnerviolenceagainstwomenintheeuropeanunionacrossnationalinvariancestudy
AT marisollila psychologicalintimatepartnerviolenceagainstwomenintheeuropeanunionacrossnationalinvariancestudy