Reproducibility of EEG functional connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease

Abstract Background Although numerous electroencephalogram (EEG) studies have described differences in functional connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) compared to healthy subjects, there is no general consensus on the methodology of estimating functional connectivity in AD. Inconsistent results...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Casper T. Briels, Deborah N. Schoonhoven, Cornelis J. Stam, Hanneke de Waal, Philip Scheltens, Alida A. Gouw
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-06-01
Series:Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13195-020-00632-3
_version_ 1819060246583181312
author Casper T. Briels
Deborah N. Schoonhoven
Cornelis J. Stam
Hanneke de Waal
Philip Scheltens
Alida A. Gouw
author_facet Casper T. Briels
Deborah N. Schoonhoven
Cornelis J. Stam
Hanneke de Waal
Philip Scheltens
Alida A. Gouw
author_sort Casper T. Briels
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Although numerous electroencephalogram (EEG) studies have described differences in functional connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) compared to healthy subjects, there is no general consensus on the methodology of estimating functional connectivity in AD. Inconsistent results are reported due to multiple methodological factors such as diagnostic criteria, small sample sizes and the use of functional connectivity measures sensitive to volume conduction. We aimed to investigate the reproducibility of the disease-associated effects described by commonly used functional connectivity measures with respect to the amyloid, tau and neurodegeneration (A/T/N) criteria. Methods Eyes-closed task-free 21-channel EEG was used from patients with probable AD and subjective cognitive decline (SCD), to form two cohorts. Artefact-free epochs were visually selected and several functional connectivity measures (AEC(-c), coherence, imaginary coherence, PLV, PLI, wPLI) were estimated in five frequency bands. Functional connectivity was compared between diagnoses using AN(C)OVA models correcting for sex, age and, additionally, relative power of the frequency band. Another model predicted the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) score of AD patients by functional connectivity estimates. The analysis was repeated in a subpopulation fulfilling the A/T/N criteria, after correction for influencing factors. The analyses were repeated in the second cohort. Results Two large cohorts were formed (SCD/AD; n = 197/214 and n = 202/196). Reproducible effects were found for the AEC-c in the alpha and beta frequency bands (p = 6.20 × 10−7, Cohen’s d = − 0.53; p = 5.78 × 10−4, d = − 0.37) and PLI and wPLI in the theta band (p = 3.81 × 10−8, d = 0.59; p = 1.62 × 10−8, d = 0.60, respectively). Only effects of the AEC-c remained significant after statistical correction for the relative power of the selected bandwidth. In addition, alpha band AEC-c correlated with disease severity represented by MMSE score. Conclusion The choice of functional connectivity measure and frequency band can have a large impact on the outcome of EEG studies in AD. Our results indicate that in the alpha and beta frequency bands, the effects measured by the AEC-c are reproducible and the most valid in terms of influencing factors, correlation with disease severity and preferable properties such as correction for volume conduction. Phase-based measures with correction for volume conduction, such as the PLI, showed reproducible effects in the theta frequency band.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T14:23:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4c168110cc24457893ab1fdd70649a71
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1758-9193
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T14:23:57Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy
spelling doaj.art-4c168110cc24457893ab1fdd70649a712022-12-21T19:00:42ZengBMCAlzheimer’s Research & Therapy1758-91932020-06-0112111410.1186/s13195-020-00632-3Reproducibility of EEG functional connectivity in Alzheimer’s diseaseCasper T. Briels0Deborah N. Schoonhoven1Cornelis J. Stam2Hanneke de Waal3Philip Scheltens4Alida A. Gouw5Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMCAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMCDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMCAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMCAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMCDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMCAbstract Background Although numerous electroencephalogram (EEG) studies have described differences in functional connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) compared to healthy subjects, there is no general consensus on the methodology of estimating functional connectivity in AD. Inconsistent results are reported due to multiple methodological factors such as diagnostic criteria, small sample sizes and the use of functional connectivity measures sensitive to volume conduction. We aimed to investigate the reproducibility of the disease-associated effects described by commonly used functional connectivity measures with respect to the amyloid, tau and neurodegeneration (A/T/N) criteria. Methods Eyes-closed task-free 21-channel EEG was used from patients with probable AD and subjective cognitive decline (SCD), to form two cohorts. Artefact-free epochs were visually selected and several functional connectivity measures (AEC(-c), coherence, imaginary coherence, PLV, PLI, wPLI) were estimated in five frequency bands. Functional connectivity was compared between diagnoses using AN(C)OVA models correcting for sex, age and, additionally, relative power of the frequency band. Another model predicted the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) score of AD patients by functional connectivity estimates. The analysis was repeated in a subpopulation fulfilling the A/T/N criteria, after correction for influencing factors. The analyses were repeated in the second cohort. Results Two large cohorts were formed (SCD/AD; n = 197/214 and n = 202/196). Reproducible effects were found for the AEC-c in the alpha and beta frequency bands (p = 6.20 × 10−7, Cohen’s d = − 0.53; p = 5.78 × 10−4, d = − 0.37) and PLI and wPLI in the theta band (p = 3.81 × 10−8, d = 0.59; p = 1.62 × 10−8, d = 0.60, respectively). Only effects of the AEC-c remained significant after statistical correction for the relative power of the selected bandwidth. In addition, alpha band AEC-c correlated with disease severity represented by MMSE score. Conclusion The choice of functional connectivity measure and frequency band can have a large impact on the outcome of EEG studies in AD. Our results indicate that in the alpha and beta frequency bands, the effects measured by the AEC-c are reproducible and the most valid in terms of influencing factors, correlation with disease severity and preferable properties such as correction for volume conduction. Phase-based measures with correction for volume conduction, such as the PLI, showed reproducible effects in the theta frequency band.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13195-020-00632-3Alzheimer’s diseaseEEGFunctional connectivityReproducibility
spellingShingle Casper T. Briels
Deborah N. Schoonhoven
Cornelis J. Stam
Hanneke de Waal
Philip Scheltens
Alida A. Gouw
Reproducibility of EEG functional connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease
Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy
Alzheimer’s disease
EEG
Functional connectivity
Reproducibility
title Reproducibility of EEG functional connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease
title_full Reproducibility of EEG functional connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease
title_fullStr Reproducibility of EEG functional connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility of EEG functional connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease
title_short Reproducibility of EEG functional connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease
title_sort reproducibility of eeg functional connectivity in alzheimer s disease
topic Alzheimer’s disease
EEG
Functional connectivity
Reproducibility
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13195-020-00632-3
work_keys_str_mv AT caspertbriels reproducibilityofeegfunctionalconnectivityinalzheimersdisease
AT deborahnschoonhoven reproducibilityofeegfunctionalconnectivityinalzheimersdisease
AT cornelisjstam reproducibilityofeegfunctionalconnectivityinalzheimersdisease
AT hannekedewaal reproducibilityofeegfunctionalconnectivityinalzheimersdisease
AT philipscheltens reproducibilityofeegfunctionalconnectivityinalzheimersdisease
AT alidaagouw reproducibilityofeegfunctionalconnectivityinalzheimersdisease