Identity and dignity within the human rights discourse: An anthropological and praxis approach

<span>The theological discourse mostly focuses on the moral and ethical framework for human rights and human dignity. In order to give theological justification to the value and dignity of human beings, most theologians point to the </span><em>imago Dei</em><span> as th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Daniel J. Louw
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: AOSIS 2014-08-01
Series:Verbum et Ecclesia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://verbumetecclesia.org.za/index.php/VE/article/view/876
_version_ 1818160466507071488
author Daniel J. Louw
author_facet Daniel J. Louw
author_sort Daniel J. Louw
collection DOAJ
description <span>The theological discourse mostly focuses on the moral and ethical framework for human rights and human dignity. In order to give theological justification to the value and dignity of human beings, most theologians point to the </span><em>imago Dei</em><span> as theological starting point for the design of an anthropology on human dignity. Within the paradigmatic framework of democracy, human dignity and human rights have become interchangeable concepts. This article aimed to focus not on ethics but on aesthetics: man as </span><em>homo aestheticus</em><span>, as well as the praxis question regarding the quality of human dignity within the network of human relationships. It was argued that human dignity is more fundamental than human rights. Dignity as an anthropological construct should not reside in the first place in the </span><em>imago Dei</em><span> and its relationship to Christology and incarnation theology. Human dignity, human rights and human identity are embedded in the basic human quest for meaning (teleology). As such, human dignity should, in a practical theological approach to anthropology, be dealt with from the aesthetic perspective of charisma, thus the option for inhabitational theology. As an anthropological category, human dignity should be viewed from the perspective of pneumatology within the networking framework of a �spiritual humanism�. In this regard, the theology of the Dutch theologian A.A. van Ruler, and especially his seminal 1968 work </span><em>Ik geloof</em><span>, should be revisited by a pneumatic anthropology within the parameters of practical theology.</span>
first_indexed 2024-12-11T16:02:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4c2be75bef0d440c8f5050599b968bcc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1609-9982
2074-7705
language Afrikaans
last_indexed 2024-12-11T16:02:19Z
publishDate 2014-08-01
publisher AOSIS
record_format Article
series Verbum et Ecclesia
spelling doaj.art-4c2be75bef0d440c8f5050599b968bcc2022-12-22T00:59:16ZafrAOSISVerbum et Ecclesia1609-99822074-77052014-08-0135210.4102/ve.v35i2.8761160Identity and dignity within the human rights discourse: An anthropological and praxis approachDaniel J. Louw0Faculty of Theology, University of Stellenbosch<span>The theological discourse mostly focuses on the moral and ethical framework for human rights and human dignity. In order to give theological justification to the value and dignity of human beings, most theologians point to the </span><em>imago Dei</em><span> as theological starting point for the design of an anthropology on human dignity. Within the paradigmatic framework of democracy, human dignity and human rights have become interchangeable concepts. This article aimed to focus not on ethics but on aesthetics: man as </span><em>homo aestheticus</em><span>, as well as the praxis question regarding the quality of human dignity within the network of human relationships. It was argued that human dignity is more fundamental than human rights. Dignity as an anthropological construct should not reside in the first place in the </span><em>imago Dei</em><span> and its relationship to Christology and incarnation theology. Human dignity, human rights and human identity are embedded in the basic human quest for meaning (teleology). As such, human dignity should, in a practical theological approach to anthropology, be dealt with from the aesthetic perspective of charisma, thus the option for inhabitational theology. As an anthropological category, human dignity should be viewed from the perspective of pneumatology within the networking framework of a �spiritual humanism�. In this regard, the theology of the Dutch theologian A.A. van Ruler, and especially his seminal 1968 work </span><em>Ik geloof</em><span>, should be revisited by a pneumatic anthropology within the parameters of practical theology.</span>http://verbumetecclesia.org.za/index.php/VE/article/view/876Human rights, human dignity, eschatological identity, homo eastheticus, anthropology, aesthetics, pneumatology
spellingShingle Daniel J. Louw
Identity and dignity within the human rights discourse: An anthropological and praxis approach
Verbum et Ecclesia
Human rights, human dignity, eschatological identity, homo eastheticus, anthropology, aesthetics, pneumatology
title Identity and dignity within the human rights discourse: An anthropological and praxis approach
title_full Identity and dignity within the human rights discourse: An anthropological and praxis approach
title_fullStr Identity and dignity within the human rights discourse: An anthropological and praxis approach
title_full_unstemmed Identity and dignity within the human rights discourse: An anthropological and praxis approach
title_short Identity and dignity within the human rights discourse: An anthropological and praxis approach
title_sort identity and dignity within the human rights discourse an anthropological and praxis approach
topic Human rights, human dignity, eschatological identity, homo eastheticus, anthropology, aesthetics, pneumatology
url http://verbumetecclesia.org.za/index.php/VE/article/view/876
work_keys_str_mv AT danieljlouw identityanddignitywithinthehumanrightsdiscourseananthropologicalandpraxisapproach