A Comparative Study of Compromise in the Transnational Civil Procedure Law and the Iranian Law
Compromise has long been considered as one of the most effective procedures of settling disputes in the laws of different countries. In this regard, the Transnational Civil Procedure Code has entered the field of existence with the aims of explaining the basic concepts of the justice vital elements...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Mazandaran
2022-06-01
|
| Series: | پژوهشنامه حقوق تطبیقی |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://lps.journals.umz.ac.ir/article_3716_b0b6218525b0094d6d57a650d74f1485.pdf |
| _version_ | 1797942600347418624 |
|---|---|
| author | Hamid Abhari Mehdi Taleqan Ghafari Seyed tahere Moosavi khatir |
| author_facet | Hamid Abhari Mehdi Taleqan Ghafari Seyed tahere Moosavi khatir |
| author_sort | Hamid Abhari |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Compromise has long been considered as one of the most effective procedures of settling disputes in the laws of different countries. In this regard, the Transnational Civil Procedure Code has entered the field of existence with the aims of explaining the basic concepts of the justice vital elements in various legal systems of the world and ultimately providing a codified law, especially in the field of international commercial litigation which can be extended to other civil law disputes. It has also paid special attention to resolving disputes through peace and reconciliation. If the proposed compromise of the mentioned law is not accepted without a justifiable excuse, it will be accompanied by a legal sanction, which is clearly in conflict with the philosophy of compromise. The Iranian legislature has paid attention to resolving disputes through compromise in various laws, and has even enacted a special law called the Law on Dispute Settlement Councils to revive and spread the culture of peace and compromise. Considering the several benefits of settling disputes through compromise, the present article seeks to make a comparative study of compromise in the Transnational Civil Procedure Code and the Iranian law using a descriptive-analytical method and library studies to express the compliance of the mentioned laws and determine the differences between them. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T20:11:07Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-4c3d0389717c4dd0802cd0118d6f5b38 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2423-7566 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T20:11:07Z |
| publishDate | 2022-06-01 |
| publisher | University of Mazandaran |
| record_format | Article |
| series | پژوهشنامه حقوق تطبیقی |
| spelling | doaj.art-4c3d0389717c4dd0802cd0118d6f5b382023-01-26T11:06:50ZengUniversity of Mazandaranپژوهشنامه حقوق تطبیقی2423-75662022-06-016172110.22080/lps.2022.22180.12593716A Comparative Study of Compromise in the Transnational Civil Procedure Law and the Iranian LawHamid Abhari0Mehdi Taleqan Ghafari1Seyed tahere Moosavi khatir2Professor, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.PhD Student in Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.PhD Student in Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.Compromise has long been considered as one of the most effective procedures of settling disputes in the laws of different countries. In this regard, the Transnational Civil Procedure Code has entered the field of existence with the aims of explaining the basic concepts of the justice vital elements in various legal systems of the world and ultimately providing a codified law, especially in the field of international commercial litigation which can be extended to other civil law disputes. It has also paid special attention to resolving disputes through peace and reconciliation. If the proposed compromise of the mentioned law is not accepted without a justifiable excuse, it will be accompanied by a legal sanction, which is clearly in conflict with the philosophy of compromise. The Iranian legislature has paid attention to resolving disputes through compromise in various laws, and has even enacted a special law called the Law on Dispute Settlement Councils to revive and spread the culture of peace and compromise. Considering the several benefits of settling disputes through compromise, the present article seeks to make a comparative study of compromise in the Transnational Civil Procedure Code and the Iranian law using a descriptive-analytical method and library studies to express the compliance of the mentioned laws and determine the differences between them.https://lps.journals.umz.ac.ir/article_3716_b0b6218525b0094d6d57a650d74f1485.pdftransnational civil procedurenationalalternative dispute resolution methodspeace and reconciliationiranian law |
| spellingShingle | Hamid Abhari Mehdi Taleqan Ghafari Seyed tahere Moosavi khatir A Comparative Study of Compromise in the Transnational Civil Procedure Law and the Iranian Law پژوهشنامه حقوق تطبیقی transnational civil procedure national alternative dispute resolution methods peace and reconciliation iranian law |
| title | A Comparative Study of Compromise in the Transnational Civil Procedure Law and the Iranian Law |
| title_full | A Comparative Study of Compromise in the Transnational Civil Procedure Law and the Iranian Law |
| title_fullStr | A Comparative Study of Compromise in the Transnational Civil Procedure Law and the Iranian Law |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Study of Compromise in the Transnational Civil Procedure Law and the Iranian Law |
| title_short | A Comparative Study of Compromise in the Transnational Civil Procedure Law and the Iranian Law |
| title_sort | comparative study of compromise in the transnational civil procedure law and the iranian law |
| topic | transnational civil procedure national alternative dispute resolution methods peace and reconciliation iranian law |
| url | https://lps.journals.umz.ac.ir/article_3716_b0b6218525b0094d6d57a650d74f1485.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hamidabhari acomparativestudyofcompromiseinthetransnationalcivilprocedurelawandtheiranianlaw AT mehditaleqanghafari acomparativestudyofcompromiseinthetransnationalcivilprocedurelawandtheiranianlaw AT seyedtaheremoosavikhatir acomparativestudyofcompromiseinthetransnationalcivilprocedurelawandtheiranianlaw AT hamidabhari comparativestudyofcompromiseinthetransnationalcivilprocedurelawandtheiranianlaw AT mehditaleqanghafari comparativestudyofcompromiseinthetransnationalcivilprocedurelawandtheiranianlaw AT seyedtaheremoosavikhatir comparativestudyofcompromiseinthetransnationalcivilprocedurelawandtheiranianlaw |