Forest regeneration pathways in contrasting deforestation patterns of Amazonia

Secondary vegetation is increasingly recognized as a key element for biodiversity conservation and carbon stocks in human-modified landscapes. Contrasting deforestation patterns should lead to distinct patterns of forest regeneration, but this relationship is yet to be unveiled for long-term studies...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lucas Alencar, Maria Isabel Sobral Escada, José Luís Campana Camargo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Environmental Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2023.991695/full
_version_ 1811175334646644736
author Lucas Alencar
Lucas Alencar
Maria Isabel Sobral Escada
José Luís Campana Camargo
author_facet Lucas Alencar
Lucas Alencar
Maria Isabel Sobral Escada
José Luís Campana Camargo
author_sort Lucas Alencar
collection DOAJ
description Secondary vegetation is increasingly recognized as a key element for biodiversity conservation and carbon stocks in human-modified landscapes. Contrasting deforestation patterns should lead to distinct patterns of forest regeneration, but this relationship is yet to be unveiled for long-term studies. Using Landsat data from 1985–2015, we analyzed the surface area, spatial distribution, and age of secondary vegetation in Fishbone and Geometric patterns of deforestation. Additionally, we investigated to which extent secondary vegetation reduces forest patch isolation at the landscape level across time. We found the Fishbone pattern to consistently have more secondary vegetation over time than the Geometric pattern, despite having the same size of the deforested area. However, the Fishbone pattern showed more secondary vegetation area with less than 5 years old, while the Geometric pattern showed more area with secondary vegetation with more than 30 years old. Regarding spatial distribution, we found secondary vegetation to be more spread across the entire landscape at the Fishbone pattern and to consistently reduce forest patch isolation across time. This is congruent with the land use typically found in Geometric (industrial cropping and ranching) and Fishbone (fallow agriculture with small-scale ranching) patterns. These findings indicate that the Fishbone pattern of deforestation produces a more biodiversity-friendly landscape structure than the Geometric pattern. On the other hand, older secondary vegetation found in the Geometric deforestation pattern could indicate more carbon stocked in those landscapes. Future public policies of land use and occupation should consider better landscape planning and management to overcome this duality and create synergies between biodiversity conservation and secondary vegetation carbon stock.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T19:35:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4c5287a6d118495c98f27abaee8bf7f8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-665X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T19:35:27Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Environmental Science
spelling doaj.art-4c5287a6d118495c98f27abaee8bf7f82023-01-30T08:01:41ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Environmental Science2296-665X2023-01-011110.3389/fenvs.2023.991695991695Forest regeneration pathways in contrasting deforestation patterns of AmazoniaLucas Alencar0Lucas Alencar1Maria Isabel Sobral Escada2José Luís Campana Camargo3Laboratory of Applied Ecology, Biosciences Centre, Department of Botany, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, BrazilBiological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project, Department of Ecology, National Institute for Amazon Research, Manaus, BrazilGeneral Coordination of Earth Observation, Image Processing Division, National Institute for Space Research, São Paulo, BrazilBiological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project, Department of Ecology, National Institute for Amazon Research, Manaus, BrazilSecondary vegetation is increasingly recognized as a key element for biodiversity conservation and carbon stocks in human-modified landscapes. Contrasting deforestation patterns should lead to distinct patterns of forest regeneration, but this relationship is yet to be unveiled for long-term studies. Using Landsat data from 1985–2015, we analyzed the surface area, spatial distribution, and age of secondary vegetation in Fishbone and Geometric patterns of deforestation. Additionally, we investigated to which extent secondary vegetation reduces forest patch isolation at the landscape level across time. We found the Fishbone pattern to consistently have more secondary vegetation over time than the Geometric pattern, despite having the same size of the deforested area. However, the Fishbone pattern showed more secondary vegetation area with less than 5 years old, while the Geometric pattern showed more area with secondary vegetation with more than 30 years old. Regarding spatial distribution, we found secondary vegetation to be more spread across the entire landscape at the Fishbone pattern and to consistently reduce forest patch isolation across time. This is congruent with the land use typically found in Geometric (industrial cropping and ranching) and Fishbone (fallow agriculture with small-scale ranching) patterns. These findings indicate that the Fishbone pattern of deforestation produces a more biodiversity-friendly landscape structure than the Geometric pattern. On the other hand, older secondary vegetation found in the Geometric deforestation pattern could indicate more carbon stocked in those landscapes. Future public policies of land use and occupation should consider better landscape planning and management to overcome this duality and create synergies between biodiversity conservation and secondary vegetation carbon stock.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2023.991695/fullforest fragmentationnatural regenerationremote sensinglandscape metricsANCOVA
spellingShingle Lucas Alencar
Lucas Alencar
Maria Isabel Sobral Escada
José Luís Campana Camargo
Forest regeneration pathways in contrasting deforestation patterns of Amazonia
Frontiers in Environmental Science
forest fragmentation
natural regeneration
remote sensing
landscape metrics
ANCOVA
title Forest regeneration pathways in contrasting deforestation patterns of Amazonia
title_full Forest regeneration pathways in contrasting deforestation patterns of Amazonia
title_fullStr Forest regeneration pathways in contrasting deforestation patterns of Amazonia
title_full_unstemmed Forest regeneration pathways in contrasting deforestation patterns of Amazonia
title_short Forest regeneration pathways in contrasting deforestation patterns of Amazonia
title_sort forest regeneration pathways in contrasting deforestation patterns of amazonia
topic forest fragmentation
natural regeneration
remote sensing
landscape metrics
ANCOVA
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2023.991695/full
work_keys_str_mv AT lucasalencar forestregenerationpathwaysincontrastingdeforestationpatternsofamazonia
AT lucasalencar forestregenerationpathwaysincontrastingdeforestationpatternsofamazonia
AT mariaisabelsobralescada forestregenerationpathwaysincontrastingdeforestationpatternsofamazonia
AT joseluiscampanacamargo forestregenerationpathwaysincontrastingdeforestationpatternsofamazonia