Multimodal physiological sensing for the assessment of acute pain

Pain assessment is a challenging task encountered by clinicians. In clinical settings, patients’ self-report is considered the gold standard in pain assessment. However, patients who are unable to self-report pain are at a higher risk of undiagnosed pain. In the present study, we explore the use of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Raul Fernandez Rojas, Niraj Hirachan, Nicholas Brown, Gordon Waddington, Luke Murtagh, Ben Seymour, Roland Goecke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Pain Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpain.2023.1150264/full
_version_ 1797799421205807104
author Raul Fernandez Rojas
Niraj Hirachan
Nicholas Brown
Gordon Waddington
Gordon Waddington
Luke Murtagh
Ben Seymour
Ben Seymour
Roland Goecke
author_facet Raul Fernandez Rojas
Niraj Hirachan
Nicholas Brown
Gordon Waddington
Gordon Waddington
Luke Murtagh
Ben Seymour
Ben Seymour
Roland Goecke
author_sort Raul Fernandez Rojas
collection DOAJ
description Pain assessment is a challenging task encountered by clinicians. In clinical settings, patients’ self-report is considered the gold standard in pain assessment. However, patients who are unable to self-report pain are at a higher risk of undiagnosed pain. In the present study, we explore the use of multiple sensing technologies to monitor physiological changes that can be used as a proxy for objective measurement of acute pain. Electrodermal activity (EDA), photoplethysmography (PPG), and respiration (RESP) signals were collected from 22 participants under two pain intensities (low and high) and on two different anatomical locations (forearm and hand). Three machine learning models were implemented, including support vector machines (SVM), decision trees (DT), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) for the identification of pain. Various pain scenarios were investigated, identification of pain (no pain, pain), multiclass (no pain, low pain, high pain), and identification of pain location (forearm, hand). Reference classification results from individual sensors and from all sensors together were obtained. After feature selection, results showed that EDA was the most informative sensor in the three pain conditions, 93.2±8% in identification of pain, 68.9±10% in the multiclass problem, and 56.0±8% for the identification of pain location. These results identify EDA as the superior sensor in our experimental conditions. Future work is required to validate the obtained features to improve its feasibility in more realistic scenarios. Finally, this study proposes EDA as a candidate to design a tool that can assist clinicians in the assessment of acute pain of nonverbal patients.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T04:19:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4c6216324b0946dcacbe3595732a69c7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-561X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T04:19:36Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pain Research
spelling doaj.art-4c6216324b0946dcacbe3595732a69c72023-06-20T13:52:14ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pain Research2673-561X2023-06-01410.3389/fpain.2023.11502641150264Multimodal physiological sensing for the assessment of acute painRaul Fernandez Rojas0Niraj Hirachan1Nicholas Brown2Gordon Waddington3Gordon Waddington4Luke Murtagh5Ben Seymour6Ben Seymour7Roland Goecke8Human-Centred Technology Research Centre, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, AustraliaHuman-Centred Technology Research Centre, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, AustraliaFaculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaAustralian Institute of Sport, Canberra, ACT, AustraliaUniversity of Canberra Research Institute for Sport and Exercise (UCRISE), University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, AustraliaDepartment of Anaesthesia, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT, AustraliaWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, UKOxford Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Headington, UKHuman-Centred Technology Research Centre, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, AustraliaPain assessment is a challenging task encountered by clinicians. In clinical settings, patients’ self-report is considered the gold standard in pain assessment. However, patients who are unable to self-report pain are at a higher risk of undiagnosed pain. In the present study, we explore the use of multiple sensing technologies to monitor physiological changes that can be used as a proxy for objective measurement of acute pain. Electrodermal activity (EDA), photoplethysmography (PPG), and respiration (RESP) signals were collected from 22 participants under two pain intensities (low and high) and on two different anatomical locations (forearm and hand). Three machine learning models were implemented, including support vector machines (SVM), decision trees (DT), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) for the identification of pain. Various pain scenarios were investigated, identification of pain (no pain, pain), multiclass (no pain, low pain, high pain), and identification of pain location (forearm, hand). Reference classification results from individual sensors and from all sensors together were obtained. After feature selection, results showed that EDA was the most informative sensor in the three pain conditions, 93.2±8% in identification of pain, 68.9±10% in the multiclass problem, and 56.0±8% for the identification of pain location. These results identify EDA as the superior sensor in our experimental conditions. Future work is required to validate the obtained features to improve its feasibility in more realistic scenarios. Finally, this study proposes EDA as a candidate to design a tool that can assist clinicians in the assessment of acute pain of nonverbal patients.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpain.2023.1150264/fullPaindata fusionphysiologymachine learningnon-verbalEDA
spellingShingle Raul Fernandez Rojas
Niraj Hirachan
Nicholas Brown
Gordon Waddington
Gordon Waddington
Luke Murtagh
Ben Seymour
Ben Seymour
Roland Goecke
Multimodal physiological sensing for the assessment of acute pain
Frontiers in Pain Research
Pain
data fusion
physiology
machine learning
non-verbal
EDA
title Multimodal physiological sensing for the assessment of acute pain
title_full Multimodal physiological sensing for the assessment of acute pain
title_fullStr Multimodal physiological sensing for the assessment of acute pain
title_full_unstemmed Multimodal physiological sensing for the assessment of acute pain
title_short Multimodal physiological sensing for the assessment of acute pain
title_sort multimodal physiological sensing for the assessment of acute pain
topic Pain
data fusion
physiology
machine learning
non-verbal
EDA
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpain.2023.1150264/full
work_keys_str_mv AT raulfernandezrojas multimodalphysiologicalsensingfortheassessmentofacutepain
AT nirajhirachan multimodalphysiologicalsensingfortheassessmentofacutepain
AT nicholasbrown multimodalphysiologicalsensingfortheassessmentofacutepain
AT gordonwaddington multimodalphysiologicalsensingfortheassessmentofacutepain
AT gordonwaddington multimodalphysiologicalsensingfortheassessmentofacutepain
AT lukemurtagh multimodalphysiologicalsensingfortheassessmentofacutepain
AT benseymour multimodalphysiologicalsensingfortheassessmentofacutepain
AT benseymour multimodalphysiologicalsensingfortheassessmentofacutepain
AT rolandgoecke multimodalphysiologicalsensingfortheassessmentofacutepain