Current Trends of Research Productivity among Students Matching at Top Ophthalmology Programs

Importance San Francisco Match publishes no data on the research output of matched applicants to an ophthalmology residency. Objective The aim of this study was to examine the temporal trends in publication volume by medical students who successfully matched into a top ophthalmology resid...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benjamin Zhou, Nivetha Srinivasan, Shree Nadkarni, Varun Taruvai, Amy Song, Albert S. Khouri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2022-01-01
Series:Journal of Academic Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0042-1746423
_version_ 1818551507303268352
author Benjamin Zhou
Nivetha Srinivasan
Shree Nadkarni
Varun Taruvai
Amy Song
Albert S. Khouri
author_facet Benjamin Zhou
Nivetha Srinivasan
Shree Nadkarni
Varun Taruvai
Amy Song
Albert S. Khouri
author_sort Benjamin Zhou
collection DOAJ
description Importance San Francisco Match publishes no data on the research output of matched applicants to an ophthalmology residency. Objective The aim of this study was to examine the temporal trends in publication volume by medical students who successfully matched into a top ophthalmology residency. Methods This retrospective case series compared all residents in the top 30 ophthalmology residency programs from the class of 2022 and 2017. Publication volume from before September 15th of the residents' fourth year of medical school was recorded using PubMed and Google Scholar. We recorded total number of publications (any authorship), first/second author publications, and ophthalmology-specific publications. Using Welch's t-test, publication volumes were statistically compared against all others. Results One-hundred sixty-one residents from the class of 2022 and 145 residents from the class of 2017 were included. Total publications per matched applicant (mean ± standard deviation) were 3.04 ± 0.35 for the class of 2022 and 1.67 ± 0.23 for the class of 2017. Mean publications in ophthalmology journals were 1.07 ± 0.20 (2022) and 0.58 ± 0.13 (2017); mean first author publications were 1.00 ± 0.13 (2022) and 0.64 ± 0.11 (2017) and mean second author publications were 0.70 ± 0.10 (2022) and 0.37 ± 0.06 (2017). Research productivity in all four metrics (total, ophthalmology journals, first author, and second author publications) was significantly higher for the class of 2022 than the class of 2017 (p = 0.001; p = 0.03; p = 0.03; p = 0.02, respectively) supporting the trend of increasing research output among students. Applicants with PhD degrees had statistically more total and first author publications in 2017 (p = 0.01; p = 0.045), but only more first author publications in 2022 (p = 0.01). International applicants produced significantly more total publications in 2022 (p < 0.001). Conclusions Overall, after a 5-year period, the authors found matched applicants had significantly increased publications compared with those at the beginning of the period. We also identified several applicant factors that may have variable effects on research publication. This analysis emphasizes the growing importance of research in the match process and can help future applicants navigate the ophthalmology match.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T09:00:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4c705574daaf41378e5ff9e05b42e4ad
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2475-4757
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T09:00:49Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
record_format Article
series Journal of Academic Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-4c705574daaf41378e5ff9e05b42e4ad2022-12-22T00:29:50ZengThieme Medical Publishers, Inc.Journal of Academic Ophthalmology2475-47572022-01-011401e133e14010.1055/s-0042-1746423Current Trends of Research Productivity among Students Matching at Top Ophthalmology ProgramsBenjamin Zhou0Nivetha Srinivasan1Shree Nadkarni2Varun Taruvai3Amy Song4Albert S. Khouri5Department of Ophthalmology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New JerseyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New JerseyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New JerseyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New JerseyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New JerseyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New JerseyImportance San Francisco Match publishes no data on the research output of matched applicants to an ophthalmology residency. Objective The aim of this study was to examine the temporal trends in publication volume by medical students who successfully matched into a top ophthalmology residency. Methods This retrospective case series compared all residents in the top 30 ophthalmology residency programs from the class of 2022 and 2017. Publication volume from before September 15th of the residents' fourth year of medical school was recorded using PubMed and Google Scholar. We recorded total number of publications (any authorship), first/second author publications, and ophthalmology-specific publications. Using Welch's t-test, publication volumes were statistically compared against all others. Results One-hundred sixty-one residents from the class of 2022 and 145 residents from the class of 2017 were included. Total publications per matched applicant (mean ± standard deviation) were 3.04 ± 0.35 for the class of 2022 and 1.67 ± 0.23 for the class of 2017. Mean publications in ophthalmology journals were 1.07 ± 0.20 (2022) and 0.58 ± 0.13 (2017); mean first author publications were 1.00 ± 0.13 (2022) and 0.64 ± 0.11 (2017) and mean second author publications were 0.70 ± 0.10 (2022) and 0.37 ± 0.06 (2017). Research productivity in all four metrics (total, ophthalmology journals, first author, and second author publications) was significantly higher for the class of 2022 than the class of 2017 (p = 0.001; p = 0.03; p = 0.03; p = 0.02, respectively) supporting the trend of increasing research output among students. Applicants with PhD degrees had statistically more total and first author publications in 2017 (p = 0.01; p = 0.045), but only more first author publications in 2022 (p = 0.01). International applicants produced significantly more total publications in 2022 (p < 0.001). Conclusions Overall, after a 5-year period, the authors found matched applicants had significantly increased publications compared with those at the beginning of the period. We also identified several applicant factors that may have variable effects on research publication. This analysis emphasizes the growing importance of research in the match process and can help future applicants navigate the ophthalmology match.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0042-1746423ophthalmology residencysan francisco matchpublicationsresearch productivitymedical school
spellingShingle Benjamin Zhou
Nivetha Srinivasan
Shree Nadkarni
Varun Taruvai
Amy Song
Albert S. Khouri
Current Trends of Research Productivity among Students Matching at Top Ophthalmology Programs
Journal of Academic Ophthalmology
ophthalmology residency
san francisco match
publications
research productivity
medical school
title Current Trends of Research Productivity among Students Matching at Top Ophthalmology Programs
title_full Current Trends of Research Productivity among Students Matching at Top Ophthalmology Programs
title_fullStr Current Trends of Research Productivity among Students Matching at Top Ophthalmology Programs
title_full_unstemmed Current Trends of Research Productivity among Students Matching at Top Ophthalmology Programs
title_short Current Trends of Research Productivity among Students Matching at Top Ophthalmology Programs
title_sort current trends of research productivity among students matching at top ophthalmology programs
topic ophthalmology residency
san francisco match
publications
research productivity
medical school
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0042-1746423
work_keys_str_mv AT benjaminzhou currenttrendsofresearchproductivityamongstudentsmatchingattopophthalmologyprograms
AT nivethasrinivasan currenttrendsofresearchproductivityamongstudentsmatchingattopophthalmologyprograms
AT shreenadkarni currenttrendsofresearchproductivityamongstudentsmatchingattopophthalmologyprograms
AT varuntaruvai currenttrendsofresearchproductivityamongstudentsmatchingattopophthalmologyprograms
AT amysong currenttrendsofresearchproductivityamongstudentsmatchingattopophthalmologyprograms
AT albertskhouri currenttrendsofresearchproductivityamongstudentsmatchingattopophthalmologyprograms