Littisk avfallsmateriale som kilde til datering. En case-study fra Sandholmen ved Glomma, Østfold

The aim of this contribution is to demonstrate the usefulness of a targeted technological analysis and technological classification (i.e. attribute analysis of blades and flakes) as a supplement to traditional typological approaches for establishing site chronology. The analysis was performed on a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lotte Eigeland, Anja Mansrud, Per Persson
Format: Article
Language:Danish
Published: Primitive Tider 2016-12-01
Series:Primitive Tider
Online Access:https://journals.uio.no/PT/article/view/7214
_version_ 1811271957227765760
author Lotte Eigeland
Anja Mansrud
Per Persson
author_facet Lotte Eigeland
Anja Mansrud
Per Persson
author_sort Lotte Eigeland
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this contribution is to demonstrate the usefulness of a targeted technological analysis and technological classification (i.e. attribute analysis of blades and flakes) as a supplement to traditional typological approaches for establishing site chronology. The analysis was performed on a small lithic assemblage from Sandholmen, Østfold. The Sandholmen site, situated on a small islet in river Glomma, is renowned because of the large number of pit-houses of assumed Late Mesolithic age. Two of the pit-houses are situated at the brink of the islet, highly exposed to erosion from the river, and are partly damaged by annual floods. Thus, in 2015, a small rescue excavation was undertaken. A small assemblage of lithics (of which 96% was flint) were recovered. There were few typologically distinctive artefacts. However, during the investigation, a core-tablet with faceted platform turned up in pit house A. Based on current knowledge of Mesolithic technology and chronology in Eastern Norway, this is indicative of the northeastern conical core concept, thus indicating a Middle Mesolithic age. Three C14-dates from pit house A came out with Middle/Late Mesolithic dates spanning from c. 7500-6100 cal. BC. The dates suggest long-time occupation and/or re-occupation of the house. In order to investigate whether one or several different technological traditions could be identified, an attribute analysis was performed on 115 blades, blade fragments and blade artefacts, and 138 flakes. Although admittedly a small sample, the material indicates a Middle Mesolithic conical core technology. The concept of production was directed towards a combined blade/microblade technology, by the use of indirect punch and pressure technique. 
first_indexed 2024-04-12T22:31:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4c7db5cbe91147a28a3bca7030634ee1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1501-0430
2535-6194
language Danish
last_indexed 2024-04-12T22:31:33Z
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher Primitive Tider
record_format Article
series Primitive Tider
spelling doaj.art-4c7db5cbe91147a28a3bca7030634ee12022-12-22T03:13:58ZdanPrimitive TiderPrimitive Tider1501-04302535-61942016-12-011810.5617/pt.7214Littisk avfallsmateriale som kilde til datering. En case-study fra Sandholmen ved Glomma, ØstfoldLotte Eigeland0Anja Mansrud1Per Persson2Kulturhistorisk museum, Universitetet i OsloKulturhistorisk museum, Universitetet i OsloKulturhistorisk museum, Universitetet i Oslo The aim of this contribution is to demonstrate the usefulness of a targeted technological analysis and technological classification (i.e. attribute analysis of blades and flakes) as a supplement to traditional typological approaches for establishing site chronology. The analysis was performed on a small lithic assemblage from Sandholmen, Østfold. The Sandholmen site, situated on a small islet in river Glomma, is renowned because of the large number of pit-houses of assumed Late Mesolithic age. Two of the pit-houses are situated at the brink of the islet, highly exposed to erosion from the river, and are partly damaged by annual floods. Thus, in 2015, a small rescue excavation was undertaken. A small assemblage of lithics (of which 96% was flint) were recovered. There were few typologically distinctive artefacts. However, during the investigation, a core-tablet with faceted platform turned up in pit house A. Based on current knowledge of Mesolithic technology and chronology in Eastern Norway, this is indicative of the northeastern conical core concept, thus indicating a Middle Mesolithic age. Three C14-dates from pit house A came out with Middle/Late Mesolithic dates spanning from c. 7500-6100 cal. BC. The dates suggest long-time occupation and/or re-occupation of the house. In order to investigate whether one or several different technological traditions could be identified, an attribute analysis was performed on 115 blades, blade fragments and blade artefacts, and 138 flakes. Although admittedly a small sample, the material indicates a Middle Mesolithic conical core technology. The concept of production was directed towards a combined blade/microblade technology, by the use of indirect punch and pressure technique.  https://journals.uio.no/PT/article/view/7214
spellingShingle Lotte Eigeland
Anja Mansrud
Per Persson
Littisk avfallsmateriale som kilde til datering. En case-study fra Sandholmen ved Glomma, Østfold
Primitive Tider
title Littisk avfallsmateriale som kilde til datering. En case-study fra Sandholmen ved Glomma, Østfold
title_full Littisk avfallsmateriale som kilde til datering. En case-study fra Sandholmen ved Glomma, Østfold
title_fullStr Littisk avfallsmateriale som kilde til datering. En case-study fra Sandholmen ved Glomma, Østfold
title_full_unstemmed Littisk avfallsmateriale som kilde til datering. En case-study fra Sandholmen ved Glomma, Østfold
title_short Littisk avfallsmateriale som kilde til datering. En case-study fra Sandholmen ved Glomma, Østfold
title_sort littisk avfallsmateriale som kilde til datering en case study fra sandholmen ved glomma ostfold
url https://journals.uio.no/PT/article/view/7214
work_keys_str_mv AT lotteeigeland littiskavfallsmaterialesomkildetildateringencasestudyfrasandholmenvedglommaøstfold
AT anjamansrud littiskavfallsmaterialesomkildetildateringencasestudyfrasandholmenvedglommaøstfold
AT perpersson littiskavfallsmaterialesomkildetildateringencasestudyfrasandholmenvedglommaøstfold