TO BE OR NOT TO BE PLAGIARISM? UNCONSTITUTIONALITY CRITICISMS OF ART. 170 PARA. (1) OF THE ROMANIAN NATIONAL EDUCATION LAW
Plagiarism in Romania became a controversial issue analyzed by the specialists. Also, the problem became not only a subject for the administrative authority (CNATDCU), but also for the courts of law who were empowered to analyze if doctoral theses were authentic or not, solving therefore plagiarism...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House
2022-06-01
|
| Series: | Challenges of the Knowledge Society |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://cks.univnt.ro/download/cks_2022_articles%252F3_CKS_2022_PUBLIC_LAW%252FCKS_2022_PUBLIC_LAW_008.pdf |
| _version_ | 1818535575895932928 |
|---|---|
| author | Marta-Claudia CLIZA Dragoș-Cătălin BORCEA Laura-Cristiana SPĂTARU-NEGURĂ |
| author_facet | Marta-Claudia CLIZA Dragoș-Cătălin BORCEA Laura-Cristiana SPĂTARU-NEGURĂ |
| author_sort | Marta-Claudia CLIZA |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Plagiarism in Romania became a controversial issue analyzed by the specialists. Also, the problem became not only a subject for the administrative authority (CNATDCU), but also for the courts of law who were empowered to analyze if doctoral theses were authentic or not, solving therefore plagiarism allegations. Historically speaking, we can discuss about legislation in this field starting with 2004. Could it be considered that doctoral theses defended before 2004 are subject to the application of the respective piece of law? The current study will try to analyze the legal provisions applicable to the withdrawal of the title of doctor and to argue that this text is clearly unconstitutional from our point of view. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T18:26:44Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-4c801a133cc84a70acc3a697121a6d6e |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2068-7796 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-11T18:26:44Z |
| publishDate | 2022-06-01 |
| publisher | Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Challenges of the Knowledge Society |
| spelling | doaj.art-4c801a133cc84a70acc3a697121a6d6e2022-12-22T00:55:02ZengNicolae Titulescu University Publishing HouseChallenges of the Knowledge Society2068-77962022-06-01151233240TO BE OR NOT TO BE PLAGIARISM? UNCONSTITUTIONALITY CRITICISMS OF ART. 170 PARA. (1) OF THE ROMANIAN NATIONAL EDUCATION LAWMarta-Claudia CLIZA0Dragoș-Cătălin BORCEA1Laura-Cristiana SPĂTARU-NEGURĂ2Faculty of Law, ”Nicolae Titulescu” University of BucharestFaculty of Law, ”Nicolae Titulescu” University of BucharestFaculty of Law, ”Nicolae Titulescu” University of BucharestPlagiarism in Romania became a controversial issue analyzed by the specialists. Also, the problem became not only a subject for the administrative authority (CNATDCU), but also for the courts of law who were empowered to analyze if doctoral theses were authentic or not, solving therefore plagiarism allegations. Historically speaking, we can discuss about legislation in this field starting with 2004. Could it be considered that doctoral theses defended before 2004 are subject to the application of the respective piece of law? The current study will try to analyze the legal provisions applicable to the withdrawal of the title of doctor and to argue that this text is clearly unconstitutional from our point of view.http://cks.univnt.ro/download/cks_2022_articles%252F3_CKS_2022_PUBLIC_LAW%252FCKS_2022_PUBLIC_LAW_008.pdfplagiarismethicsauthorhigh standards of qualityunconstitutionality |
| spellingShingle | Marta-Claudia CLIZA Dragoș-Cătălin BORCEA Laura-Cristiana SPĂTARU-NEGURĂ TO BE OR NOT TO BE PLAGIARISM? UNCONSTITUTIONALITY CRITICISMS OF ART. 170 PARA. (1) OF THE ROMANIAN NATIONAL EDUCATION LAW Challenges of the Knowledge Society plagiarism ethics author high standards of quality unconstitutionality |
| title | TO BE OR NOT TO BE PLAGIARISM? UNCONSTITUTIONALITY CRITICISMS OF ART. 170 PARA. (1) OF THE ROMANIAN NATIONAL EDUCATION LAW |
| title_full | TO BE OR NOT TO BE PLAGIARISM? UNCONSTITUTIONALITY CRITICISMS OF ART. 170 PARA. (1) OF THE ROMANIAN NATIONAL EDUCATION LAW |
| title_fullStr | TO BE OR NOT TO BE PLAGIARISM? UNCONSTITUTIONALITY CRITICISMS OF ART. 170 PARA. (1) OF THE ROMANIAN NATIONAL EDUCATION LAW |
| title_full_unstemmed | TO BE OR NOT TO BE PLAGIARISM? UNCONSTITUTIONALITY CRITICISMS OF ART. 170 PARA. (1) OF THE ROMANIAN NATIONAL EDUCATION LAW |
| title_short | TO BE OR NOT TO BE PLAGIARISM? UNCONSTITUTIONALITY CRITICISMS OF ART. 170 PARA. (1) OF THE ROMANIAN NATIONAL EDUCATION LAW |
| title_sort | to be or not to be plagiarism unconstitutionality criticisms of art 170 para 1 of the romanian national education law |
| topic | plagiarism ethics author high standards of quality unconstitutionality |
| url | http://cks.univnt.ro/download/cks_2022_articles%252F3_CKS_2022_PUBLIC_LAW%252FCKS_2022_PUBLIC_LAW_008.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT martaclaudiacliza tobeornottobeplagiarismunconstitutionalitycriticismsofart170para1oftheromaniannationaleducationlaw AT dragoscatalinborcea tobeornottobeplagiarismunconstitutionalitycriticismsofart170para1oftheromaniannationaleducationlaw AT lauracristianaspatarunegura tobeornottobeplagiarismunconstitutionalitycriticismsofart170para1oftheromaniannationaleducationlaw |