Publish Unexpected Results That Conflict with Assumptions

Some widely held scientific assumptions have been discredited, whereas others are just inappropriate for many applications. Sometimes, a widely held analysis procedure takes on a life of its own, forgetting the original purpose of the study. The peer-reviewed system makes it difficult to get a paper...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: S. D. Logsdon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-02-01
Series:Agricultural & Environmental Letters
Online Access:https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ael/articles/1/1/150007
_version_ 1818316088358731776
author S. D. Logsdon
author_facet S. D. Logsdon
author_sort S. D. Logsdon
collection DOAJ
description Some widely held scientific assumptions have been discredited, whereas others are just inappropriate for many applications. Sometimes, a widely held analysis procedure takes on a life of its own, forgetting the original purpose of the study. The peer-reviewed system makes it difficult to get a paper published that questions established assumptions or shows data contrary to established ideas. Refusing to publish these studies is hampering the advancement of science. Novel observations should be published so that other scientists can pursue new theory.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T09:15:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4c8b69bf89c5475bba72396ed676cb1e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2471-9625
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T09:15:52Z
publishDate 2016-02-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Agricultural & Environmental Letters
spelling doaj.art-4c8b69bf89c5475bba72396ed676cb1e2022-12-21T23:52:51ZengWileyAgricultural & Environmental Letters2471-96252016-02-011110.2134/ael2015.10.0007150007Publish Unexpected Results That Conflict with AssumptionsS. D. LogsdonSome widely held scientific assumptions have been discredited, whereas others are just inappropriate for many applications. Sometimes, a widely held analysis procedure takes on a life of its own, forgetting the original purpose of the study. The peer-reviewed system makes it difficult to get a paper published that questions established assumptions or shows data contrary to established ideas. Refusing to publish these studies is hampering the advancement of science. Novel observations should be published so that other scientists can pursue new theory.https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ael/articles/1/1/150007
spellingShingle S. D. Logsdon
Publish Unexpected Results That Conflict with Assumptions
Agricultural & Environmental Letters
title Publish Unexpected Results That Conflict with Assumptions
title_full Publish Unexpected Results That Conflict with Assumptions
title_fullStr Publish Unexpected Results That Conflict with Assumptions
title_full_unstemmed Publish Unexpected Results That Conflict with Assumptions
title_short Publish Unexpected Results That Conflict with Assumptions
title_sort publish unexpected results that conflict with assumptions
url https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ael/articles/1/1/150007
work_keys_str_mv AT sdlogsdon publishunexpectedresultsthatconflictwithassumptions