An Efficient Modeling Approach for Probabilistic Assessments of Present-Day and Future Fluvial Flooding

Risk-informed flood risk management requires a comprehensive and quantitative risk assessment, which often demands multiple (thousands of) river and flood model simulations. Performing such a large number of model simulations is a challenge, especially for large, complex river systems (e.g., Mekong)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hieu Ngo, Roshanka Ranasinghe, Chris Zevenbergen, Ebru Kirezci, Dikman Maheng, Mohanasundar Radhakrishnan, Assela Pathirana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Climate
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fclim.2022.798618/full
_version_ 1817969855178997760
author Hieu Ngo
Hieu Ngo
Roshanka Ranasinghe
Roshanka Ranasinghe
Roshanka Ranasinghe
Chris Zevenbergen
Chris Zevenbergen
Ebru Kirezci
Dikman Maheng
Dikman Maheng
Dikman Maheng
Mohanasundar Radhakrishnan
Assela Pathirana
Assela Pathirana
Assela Pathirana
author_facet Hieu Ngo
Hieu Ngo
Roshanka Ranasinghe
Roshanka Ranasinghe
Roshanka Ranasinghe
Chris Zevenbergen
Chris Zevenbergen
Ebru Kirezci
Dikman Maheng
Dikman Maheng
Dikman Maheng
Mohanasundar Radhakrishnan
Assela Pathirana
Assela Pathirana
Assela Pathirana
author_sort Hieu Ngo
collection DOAJ
description Risk-informed flood risk management requires a comprehensive and quantitative risk assessment, which often demands multiple (thousands of) river and flood model simulations. Performing such a large number of model simulations is a challenge, especially for large, complex river systems (e.g., Mekong) due to the associated computational and resource demands. This article presents an efficient probabilistic modeling approach that combines a simplified 1D hydrodynamic model for the entire Mekong Delta with a detailed 1D/2D coupled model and demonstrates its application at Can Tho city in the Mekong Delta. Probabilistic flood-hazard maps, ranging from 0.5 to 100 year return period events, are obtained for the urban center of Can Tho city under different future scenarios taking into account the impact of climate change forcing (river flow, sea-level rise, storm surge) and land subsidence. Results obtained under present conditions show that more than 12% of the study area is inundated by the present-day 100 year return period of water level. Future projections show that, if the present rate of land subsidence continues, by 2050 (under both RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 climate scenarios), the 0.5 and 100 year return period flood extents will increase by around 15- and 8-fold, respectively, relative to the present-day flood extent. However, without land subsidence, the projected increases in the 0.5 and 100 year return period flood extents by 2050 (under RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5) are limited to between a doubling to tripling of the present-day flood extent. Therefore, adaptation measures that can reduce the rate of land subsidence (e.g., limiting groundwater extraction), would substantially mitigate future flood hazards in the study area. A combination of restricted groundwater extraction and the construction of a new and more efficient urban drainage network would facilitate even further reductions in the flood hazard. The projected 15-fold increase in flood extent projected by 2050 for the twice per year (0.5 year return period) flood event implies that the “do nothing” management approach is not a feasible option for Can Tho.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T20:26:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4c936159951a4149b8b24178f5049c13
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2624-9553
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T20:26:30Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Climate
spelling doaj.art-4c936159951a4149b8b24178f5049c132022-12-22T02:31:19ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Climate2624-95532022-07-01410.3389/fclim.2022.798618798618An Efficient Modeling Approach for Probabilistic Assessments of Present-Day and Future Fluvial FloodingHieu Ngo0Hieu Ngo1Roshanka Ranasinghe2Roshanka Ranasinghe3Roshanka Ranasinghe4Chris Zevenbergen5Chris Zevenbergen6Ebru Kirezci7Dikman Maheng8Dikman Maheng9Dikman Maheng10Mohanasundar Radhakrishnan11Assela Pathirana12Assela Pathirana13Assela Pathirana14Department of Coastal and Urban Risk and Risk Resilience, IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Delft, NetherlandsDepartment of Hydraulic Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, NetherlandsDepartment of Coastal and Urban Risk and Risk Resilience, IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Delft, NetherlandsDepartment of Water Engineering and Management, University of Twente, Enschede, NetherlandsHarbour, Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Deltares, Delft, NetherlandsDepartment of Coastal and Urban Risk and Risk Resilience, IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Delft, NetherlandsDepartment of Hydraulic Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, NetherlandsDepartment of Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaDepartment of Coastal and Urban Risk and Risk Resilience, IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Delft, NetherlandsDepartment of Hydraulic Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, NetherlandsDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari, Kendari, IndonesiaAgile Lotus Advisory, Schiedam, NetherlandsDepartment of Coastal and Urban Risk and Risk Resilience, IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Delft, NetherlandsUnited Nations Development Programme, Malé, MaldivesMinistry of Environment, The Government of the Maldives, Green Building, Malé, MaldivesRisk-informed flood risk management requires a comprehensive and quantitative risk assessment, which often demands multiple (thousands of) river and flood model simulations. Performing such a large number of model simulations is a challenge, especially for large, complex river systems (e.g., Mekong) due to the associated computational and resource demands. This article presents an efficient probabilistic modeling approach that combines a simplified 1D hydrodynamic model for the entire Mekong Delta with a detailed 1D/2D coupled model and demonstrates its application at Can Tho city in the Mekong Delta. Probabilistic flood-hazard maps, ranging from 0.5 to 100 year return period events, are obtained for the urban center of Can Tho city under different future scenarios taking into account the impact of climate change forcing (river flow, sea-level rise, storm surge) and land subsidence. Results obtained under present conditions show that more than 12% of the study area is inundated by the present-day 100 year return period of water level. Future projections show that, if the present rate of land subsidence continues, by 2050 (under both RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 climate scenarios), the 0.5 and 100 year return period flood extents will increase by around 15- and 8-fold, respectively, relative to the present-day flood extent. However, without land subsidence, the projected increases in the 0.5 and 100 year return period flood extents by 2050 (under RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5) are limited to between a doubling to tripling of the present-day flood extent. Therefore, adaptation measures that can reduce the rate of land subsidence (e.g., limiting groundwater extraction), would substantially mitigate future flood hazards in the study area. A combination of restricted groundwater extraction and the construction of a new and more efficient urban drainage network would facilitate even further reductions in the flood hazard. The projected 15-fold increase in flood extent projected by 2050 for the twice per year (0.5 year return period) flood event implies that the “do nothing” management approach is not a feasible option for Can Tho.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fclim.2022.798618/fullurban floodsurrogate model1D/2D modelingurban drainageMekong DeltaVietnam
spellingShingle Hieu Ngo
Hieu Ngo
Roshanka Ranasinghe
Roshanka Ranasinghe
Roshanka Ranasinghe
Chris Zevenbergen
Chris Zevenbergen
Ebru Kirezci
Dikman Maheng
Dikman Maheng
Dikman Maheng
Mohanasundar Radhakrishnan
Assela Pathirana
Assela Pathirana
Assela Pathirana
An Efficient Modeling Approach for Probabilistic Assessments of Present-Day and Future Fluvial Flooding
Frontiers in Climate
urban flood
surrogate model
1D/2D modeling
urban drainage
Mekong Delta
Vietnam
title An Efficient Modeling Approach for Probabilistic Assessments of Present-Day and Future Fluvial Flooding
title_full An Efficient Modeling Approach for Probabilistic Assessments of Present-Day and Future Fluvial Flooding
title_fullStr An Efficient Modeling Approach for Probabilistic Assessments of Present-Day and Future Fluvial Flooding
title_full_unstemmed An Efficient Modeling Approach for Probabilistic Assessments of Present-Day and Future Fluvial Flooding
title_short An Efficient Modeling Approach for Probabilistic Assessments of Present-Day and Future Fluvial Flooding
title_sort efficient modeling approach for probabilistic assessments of present day and future fluvial flooding
topic urban flood
surrogate model
1D/2D modeling
urban drainage
Mekong Delta
Vietnam
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fclim.2022.798618/full
work_keys_str_mv AT hieungo anefficientmodelingapproachforprobabilisticassessmentsofpresentdayandfuturefluvialflooding
AT hieungo anefficientmodelingapproachforprobabilisticassessmentsofpresentdayandfuturefluvialflooding
AT roshankaranasinghe anefficientmodelingapproachforprobabilisticassessmentsofpresentdayandfuturefluvialflooding
AT roshankaranasinghe anefficientmodelingapproachforprobabilisticassessmentsofpresentdayandfuturefluvialflooding
AT roshankaranasinghe anefficientmodelingapproachforprobabilisticassessmentsofpresentdayandfuturefluvialflooding
AT chriszevenbergen anefficientmodelingapproachforprobabilisticassessmentsofpresentdayandfuturefluvialflooding
AT chriszevenbergen anefficientmodelingapproachforprobabilisticassessmentsofpresentdayandfuturefluvialflooding
AT ebrukirezci anefficientmodelingapproachforprobabilisticassessmentsofpresentdayandfuturefluvialflooding
AT dikmanmaheng anefficientmodelingapproachforprobabilisticassessmentsofpresentdayandfuturefluvialflooding
AT dikmanmaheng anefficientmodelingapproachforprobabilisticassessmentsofpresentdayandfuturefluvialflooding
AT dikmanmaheng anefficientmodelingapproachforprobabilisticassessmentsofpresentdayandfuturefluvialflooding
AT mohanasundarradhakrishnan anefficientmodelingapproachforprobabilisticassessmentsofpresentdayandfuturefluvialflooding
AT asselapathirana anefficientmodelingapproachforprobabilisticassessmentsofpresentdayandfuturefluvialflooding
AT asselapathirana anefficientmodelingapproachforprobabilisticassessmentsofpresentdayandfuturefluvialflooding
AT asselapathirana anefficientmodelingapproachforprobabilisticassessmentsofpresentdayandfuturefluvialflooding
AT hieungo efficientmodelingapproachforprobabilisticassessmentsofpresentdayandfuturefluvialflooding
AT hieungo efficientmodelingapproachforprobabilisticassessmentsofpresentdayandfuturefluvialflooding
AT roshankaranasinghe efficientmodelingapproachforprobabilisticassessmentsofpresentdayandfuturefluvialflooding
AT roshankaranasinghe efficientmodelingapproachforprobabilisticassessmentsofpresentdayandfuturefluvialflooding
AT roshankaranasinghe efficientmodelingapproachforprobabilisticassessmentsofpresentdayandfuturefluvialflooding
AT chriszevenbergen efficientmodelingapproachforprobabilisticassessmentsofpresentdayandfuturefluvialflooding
AT chriszevenbergen efficientmodelingapproachforprobabilisticassessmentsofpresentdayandfuturefluvialflooding
AT ebrukirezci efficientmodelingapproachforprobabilisticassessmentsofpresentdayandfuturefluvialflooding
AT dikmanmaheng efficientmodelingapproachforprobabilisticassessmentsofpresentdayandfuturefluvialflooding
AT dikmanmaheng efficientmodelingapproachforprobabilisticassessmentsofpresentdayandfuturefluvialflooding
AT dikmanmaheng efficientmodelingapproachforprobabilisticassessmentsofpresentdayandfuturefluvialflooding
AT mohanasundarradhakrishnan efficientmodelingapproachforprobabilisticassessmentsofpresentdayandfuturefluvialflooding
AT asselapathirana efficientmodelingapproachforprobabilisticassessmentsofpresentdayandfuturefluvialflooding
AT asselapathirana efficientmodelingapproachforprobabilisticassessmentsofpresentdayandfuturefluvialflooding
AT asselapathirana efficientmodelingapproachforprobabilisticassessmentsofpresentdayandfuturefluvialflooding