Does prolonged β-lactam infusions improve clinical outcomes compared to intermittent infusions? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized, controlled trials

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The emergence of multi-drug resistant Gram-negatives (MDRGNs) coupled with an alarming scarcity of new antibiotics has forced the optimization of the therapeutic potential of available antibiotics. To exploit the time above the minim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Van Arendonk Kyle J, Suh Yong D, Putcha Nirupama, Tamma Pranita D, Rinke Michael L
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-06-01
Series:BMC Infectious Diseases
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/11/181
_version_ 1818058844354379776
author Van Arendonk Kyle J
Suh Yong D
Putcha Nirupama
Tamma Pranita D
Rinke Michael L
author_facet Van Arendonk Kyle J
Suh Yong D
Putcha Nirupama
Tamma Pranita D
Rinke Michael L
author_sort Van Arendonk Kyle J
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The emergence of multi-drug resistant Gram-negatives (MDRGNs) coupled with an alarming scarcity of new antibiotics has forced the optimization of the therapeutic potential of available antibiotics. To exploit the time above the minimum inhibitory concentration mechanism of β-lactams, prolonging their infusion may improve outcomes. The primary objective of this meta-analysis was to determine if prolonged β-lactam infusion resulted in decreased mortality and improved clinical cure compared to intermittent β-lactam infusion.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Relevant studies were identified from searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL. Heterogeneity was assessed qualitatively, in addition to I<sup>2 </sup>and Chi-square statistics. Pooled relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Mantel-Haenszel random-effects models.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Fourteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Prolonged infusion β-lactams were not associated with decreased mortality (n= 982; RR 0.92; 95% CI:0.61-1.37) or clinical cure (n = 1380; RR 1.00 95% CI:0.94-1.06) compared to intermittent infusions. Subgroup analysis for β-lactam subclasses and equivalent total daily β-lactam doses yielded similar results. Most studies had notable methodological flaws.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>No clinical advantage was observed for prolonged infusion β-lactams. The limited number of studies with MDRGNs precluded evaluation of prolonged infusion of β-lactams for this subgroup. A large, multicenter RCT with critically ill patients infected with MDRGNs is needed.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-10T13:07:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4c9eac8ecc9a4520a56ea532d970607e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2334
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T13:07:05Z
publishDate 2011-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Infectious Diseases
spelling doaj.art-4c9eac8ecc9a4520a56ea532d970607e2022-12-22T01:47:48ZengBMCBMC Infectious Diseases1471-23342011-06-0111118110.1186/1471-2334-11-181Does prolonged β-lactam infusions improve clinical outcomes compared to intermittent infusions? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized, controlled trialsVan Arendonk Kyle JSuh Yong DPutcha NirupamaTamma Pranita DRinke Michael L<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The emergence of multi-drug resistant Gram-negatives (MDRGNs) coupled with an alarming scarcity of new antibiotics has forced the optimization of the therapeutic potential of available antibiotics. To exploit the time above the minimum inhibitory concentration mechanism of β-lactams, prolonging their infusion may improve outcomes. The primary objective of this meta-analysis was to determine if prolonged β-lactam infusion resulted in decreased mortality and improved clinical cure compared to intermittent β-lactam infusion.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Relevant studies were identified from searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL. Heterogeneity was assessed qualitatively, in addition to I<sup>2 </sup>and Chi-square statistics. Pooled relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Mantel-Haenszel random-effects models.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Fourteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Prolonged infusion β-lactams were not associated with decreased mortality (n= 982; RR 0.92; 95% CI:0.61-1.37) or clinical cure (n = 1380; RR 1.00 95% CI:0.94-1.06) compared to intermittent infusions. Subgroup analysis for β-lactam subclasses and equivalent total daily β-lactam doses yielded similar results. Most studies had notable methodological flaws.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>No clinical advantage was observed for prolonged infusion β-lactams. The limited number of studies with MDRGNs precluded evaluation of prolonged infusion of β-lactams for this subgroup. A large, multicenter RCT with critically ill patients infected with MDRGNs is needed.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/11/181β-lactamsinfusionmulti-drug resistant Gram-negativesantibiotics
spellingShingle Van Arendonk Kyle J
Suh Yong D
Putcha Nirupama
Tamma Pranita D
Rinke Michael L
Does prolonged β-lactam infusions improve clinical outcomes compared to intermittent infusions? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized, controlled trials
BMC Infectious Diseases
β-lactams
infusion
multi-drug resistant Gram-negatives
antibiotics
title Does prolonged β-lactam infusions improve clinical outcomes compared to intermittent infusions? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized, controlled trials
title_full Does prolonged β-lactam infusions improve clinical outcomes compared to intermittent infusions? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized, controlled trials
title_fullStr Does prolonged β-lactam infusions improve clinical outcomes compared to intermittent infusions? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized, controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Does prolonged β-lactam infusions improve clinical outcomes compared to intermittent infusions? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized, controlled trials
title_short Does prolonged β-lactam infusions improve clinical outcomes compared to intermittent infusions? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized, controlled trials
title_sort does prolonged β lactam infusions improve clinical outcomes compared to intermittent infusions a meta analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials
topic β-lactams
infusion
multi-drug resistant Gram-negatives
antibiotics
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/11/181
work_keys_str_mv AT vanarendonkkylej doesprolongedblactaminfusionsimproveclinicaloutcomescomparedtointermittentinfusionsametaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT suhyongd doesprolongedblactaminfusionsimproveclinicaloutcomescomparedtointermittentinfusionsametaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT putchanirupama doesprolongedblactaminfusionsimproveclinicaloutcomescomparedtointermittentinfusionsametaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT tammapranitad doesprolongedblactaminfusionsimproveclinicaloutcomescomparedtointermittentinfusionsametaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT rinkemichaell doesprolongedblactaminfusionsimproveclinicaloutcomescomparedtointermittentinfusionsametaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials