The impact of divergent breed types and diets on methane emissions, rumen characteristics and performance of finishing beef cattle

This study was undertaken to further develop our understanding of the links between breed, diet and the rumen microbial community and determine their effect on production characteristics and methane (CH4) emissions from beef cattle. The experiment was of a 2×2 factorial design, comprising two breeds...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C-A. Duthie, M. Haskell, J.J. Hyslop, A. Waterhouse, R.J. Wallace, R. Roehe, J.A. Rooke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-01-01
Series:Animal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731117000301
_version_ 1818442457653706752
author C-A. Duthie
M. Haskell
J.J. Hyslop
A. Waterhouse
R.J. Wallace
R. Roehe
J.A. Rooke
author_facet C-A. Duthie
M. Haskell
J.J. Hyslop
A. Waterhouse
R.J. Wallace
R. Roehe
J.A. Rooke
author_sort C-A. Duthie
collection DOAJ
description This study was undertaken to further develop our understanding of the links between breed, diet and the rumen microbial community and determine their effect on production characteristics and methane (CH4) emissions from beef cattle. The experiment was of a 2×2 factorial design, comprising two breeds (crossbred Charolais (CHX); purebred Luing (LU)) and two diets (concentrate-straw or silage-based). In total, 80 steers were used and balanced for sire within each breed, farm of origin and BW across diets. The diets (fed as total mixed rations) consisted of (g/kg dry matter (DM)) forage to concentrate ratios of either 500 : 500 (Mixed) or 79 : 921 (Concentrate). Steers were adapted to the diets over a 4-week period and performance and feed efficiency were then measured over a 56-day test period. Directly after the 56-day test, CH4 and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions were measured (six steers/week) over a 13-week period. Compared with LU steers, CHX steers had greater average daily gain (ADG; P<0.05) and significantly (P<0.001) lower residual feed intake. Crossbred Charolais steers had superior conformation and fatness scores (P<0.001) than LU steers. Although steers consumed, on a DM basis, more Concentrate than Mixed diet (P<0.01), there were no differences between diets in either ADG or feed efficiency during the 56-day test. At slaughter, however, Concentrate-fed steers were heavier (P<0.05) and had greater carcass weights than Mixed-fed steers (P<0.001). Breed of steer did not influence CH4 production, but it was substantially lower when the Concentrate rather than Mixed diet was fed (P<0.001). Rumen fluid from Concentrate-fed steers contained greater proportions of propionic acid (P<0.001) and lower proportions of acetic acid (P<0.001), fewer archaea (P<0.01) and protozoa (P=0.09), but more Clostridium Cluster XIVa (P<0.01) and Bacteroides plus Prevotella (P<0.001) than Mixed-fed steers. When the CH4 to CO2 molar ratio was considered as a proxy method for CH4 production (g/kg DM intake), only weak relationships were found within diets. In conclusion, although feeding Concentrate and Mixed diets produced substantial differences in CH4 emissions and rumen characteristics, differences in performance were influenced more markedly by breed.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T18:44:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4ca77cbee8924eff9ce418c8adb4ebdc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1751-7311
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T18:44:27Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Animal
spelling doaj.art-4ca77cbee8924eff9ce418c8adb4ebdc2022-12-21T22:51:24ZengElsevierAnimal1751-73112017-01-01111017621771The impact of divergent breed types and diets on methane emissions, rumen characteristics and performance of finishing beef cattleC-A. Duthie0M. Haskell1J.J. Hyslop2A. Waterhouse3R.J. Wallace4R. Roehe5J.A. Rooke6Future Farming Systems Group, Beef and Sheep Research Centre, SRUC, Kings Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UKAnimal Behaviour and Welfare, Animal and Veterinary Sciences Group, SRUC, Kings Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UKBeef and Sheep Select, SAC Consulting Ltd, SRUC, Kings Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UKFuture Farming Systems Group, Beef and Sheep Research Centre, SRUC, Kings Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UKRowett Institute of Nutrition and Health, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB16 5BD, UKFuture Farming Systems Group, Beef and Sheep Research Centre, SRUC, Kings Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UKFuture Farming Systems Group, Beef and Sheep Research Centre, SRUC, Kings Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UKThis study was undertaken to further develop our understanding of the links between breed, diet and the rumen microbial community and determine their effect on production characteristics and methane (CH4) emissions from beef cattle. The experiment was of a 2×2 factorial design, comprising two breeds (crossbred Charolais (CHX); purebred Luing (LU)) and two diets (concentrate-straw or silage-based). In total, 80 steers were used and balanced for sire within each breed, farm of origin and BW across diets. The diets (fed as total mixed rations) consisted of (g/kg dry matter (DM)) forage to concentrate ratios of either 500 : 500 (Mixed) or 79 : 921 (Concentrate). Steers were adapted to the diets over a 4-week period and performance and feed efficiency were then measured over a 56-day test period. Directly after the 56-day test, CH4 and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions were measured (six steers/week) over a 13-week period. Compared with LU steers, CHX steers had greater average daily gain (ADG; P<0.05) and significantly (P<0.001) lower residual feed intake. Crossbred Charolais steers had superior conformation and fatness scores (P<0.001) than LU steers. Although steers consumed, on a DM basis, more Concentrate than Mixed diet (P<0.01), there were no differences between diets in either ADG or feed efficiency during the 56-day test. At slaughter, however, Concentrate-fed steers were heavier (P<0.05) and had greater carcass weights than Mixed-fed steers (P<0.001). Breed of steer did not influence CH4 production, but it was substantially lower when the Concentrate rather than Mixed diet was fed (P<0.001). Rumen fluid from Concentrate-fed steers contained greater proportions of propionic acid (P<0.001) and lower proportions of acetic acid (P<0.001), fewer archaea (P<0.01) and protozoa (P=0.09), but more Clostridium Cluster XIVa (P<0.01) and Bacteroides plus Prevotella (P<0.001) than Mixed-fed steers. When the CH4 to CO2 molar ratio was considered as a proxy method for CH4 production (g/kg DM intake), only weak relationships were found within diets. In conclusion, although feeding Concentrate and Mixed diets produced substantial differences in CH4 emissions and rumen characteristics, differences in performance were influenced more markedly by breed.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731117000301beef cattleconcentrateforagemethaneperformance
spellingShingle C-A. Duthie
M. Haskell
J.J. Hyslop
A. Waterhouse
R.J. Wallace
R. Roehe
J.A. Rooke
The impact of divergent breed types and diets on methane emissions, rumen characteristics and performance of finishing beef cattle
Animal
beef cattle
concentrate
forage
methane
performance
title The impact of divergent breed types and diets on methane emissions, rumen characteristics and performance of finishing beef cattle
title_full The impact of divergent breed types and diets on methane emissions, rumen characteristics and performance of finishing beef cattle
title_fullStr The impact of divergent breed types and diets on methane emissions, rumen characteristics and performance of finishing beef cattle
title_full_unstemmed The impact of divergent breed types and diets on methane emissions, rumen characteristics and performance of finishing beef cattle
title_short The impact of divergent breed types and diets on methane emissions, rumen characteristics and performance of finishing beef cattle
title_sort impact of divergent breed types and diets on methane emissions rumen characteristics and performance of finishing beef cattle
topic beef cattle
concentrate
forage
methane
performance
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731117000301
work_keys_str_mv AT caduthie theimpactofdivergentbreedtypesanddietsonmethaneemissionsrumencharacteristicsandperformanceoffinishingbeefcattle
AT mhaskell theimpactofdivergentbreedtypesanddietsonmethaneemissionsrumencharacteristicsandperformanceoffinishingbeefcattle
AT jjhyslop theimpactofdivergentbreedtypesanddietsonmethaneemissionsrumencharacteristicsandperformanceoffinishingbeefcattle
AT awaterhouse theimpactofdivergentbreedtypesanddietsonmethaneemissionsrumencharacteristicsandperformanceoffinishingbeefcattle
AT rjwallace theimpactofdivergentbreedtypesanddietsonmethaneemissionsrumencharacteristicsandperformanceoffinishingbeefcattle
AT rroehe theimpactofdivergentbreedtypesanddietsonmethaneemissionsrumencharacteristicsandperformanceoffinishingbeefcattle
AT jarooke theimpactofdivergentbreedtypesanddietsonmethaneemissionsrumencharacteristicsandperformanceoffinishingbeefcattle
AT caduthie impactofdivergentbreedtypesanddietsonmethaneemissionsrumencharacteristicsandperformanceoffinishingbeefcattle
AT mhaskell impactofdivergentbreedtypesanddietsonmethaneemissionsrumencharacteristicsandperformanceoffinishingbeefcattle
AT jjhyslop impactofdivergentbreedtypesanddietsonmethaneemissionsrumencharacteristicsandperformanceoffinishingbeefcattle
AT awaterhouse impactofdivergentbreedtypesanddietsonmethaneemissionsrumencharacteristicsandperformanceoffinishingbeefcattle
AT rjwallace impactofdivergentbreedtypesanddietsonmethaneemissionsrumencharacteristicsandperformanceoffinishingbeefcattle
AT rroehe impactofdivergentbreedtypesanddietsonmethaneemissionsrumencharacteristicsandperformanceoffinishingbeefcattle
AT jarooke impactofdivergentbreedtypesanddietsonmethaneemissionsrumencharacteristicsandperformanceoffinishingbeefcattle