Macular asymmetry analysis in sighting ocular dominance

Sighting ocular dominance is the preference of one eye over the other in terms of sighting. In this study, our aim was to examine differences in interocular and intraocular macular thickness, interocular fovea-optic disc angle, and foveal blood vessel asymmetries associated with sighting ocular domi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gökhan Pekel, Semra Acer, Fatih Özbakis, Ramazan Yagci, Nihat Sayin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014-10-01
Series:Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1607551X14001764
_version_ 1811214793205350400
author Gökhan Pekel
Semra Acer
Fatih Özbakis
Ramazan Yagci
Nihat Sayin
author_facet Gökhan Pekel
Semra Acer
Fatih Özbakis
Ramazan Yagci
Nihat Sayin
author_sort Gökhan Pekel
collection DOAJ
description Sighting ocular dominance is the preference of one eye over the other in terms of sighting. In this study, our aim was to examine differences in interocular and intraocular macular thickness, interocular fovea-optic disc angle, and foveal blood vessel asymmetries associated with sighting ocular dominance. Ninety eyes of 45 healthy young adults were included in this prospective, cross-sectional, and comparative study. Sighting ocular dominance was determined by a hole-in-the-card test. Macular thickness measurements were taken and posterior pole asymmetry analysis conducted with spectral domain optical coherence tomography. The optic disc–fovea angle and visible foveal blood vessel counts were calculated by using the posterior pole retinal images of optical coherence tomography. The mean age of the participants was 27.3 (standard deviation [SD] 6.6) years. There were 20 males and 25 females. The mean total macular area thickness, and mean macular thickness of the superior and inferior hemispheres of the dominant and nondominant eyes were similar (p > 0.05). Macular asymmetry analysis revealed no statistically significant interocular difference (p > 0.05). In the dominant eyes, the mean optic disc–fovea angle was 5.24° (SD 1.77), whereas it was 5.49° (SD 2.58) in the nondominant eyes (p = 0.51). The number of visible blood vessels passing through the fovea was similar in the dominant and nondominant eyes (p > 0.05). These results suggested that interocular and intraocular macular thickness differences, interocular fovea–optic disc angle differences, and number of visible foveal blood vessels are not associated with sighting ocular dominance.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T06:10:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4ca8699f58204eefb3e75d199b34b5ce
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1607-551X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T06:10:30Z
publishDate 2014-10-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences
spelling doaj.art-4ca8699f58204eefb3e75d199b34b5ce2022-12-22T03:44:43ZengWileyKaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences1607-551X2014-10-01301053153610.1016/j.kjms.2014.08.003Macular asymmetry analysis in sighting ocular dominanceGökhan Pekel0Semra Acer1Fatih Özbakis2Ramazan Yagci3Nihat Sayin4Department of Ophthalmology, Pamukkale University, Denizli, TurkeyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Pamukkale University, Denizli, TurkeyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Pamukkale University, Denizli, TurkeyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Pamukkale University, Denizli, TurkeyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Istanbul Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, TurkeySighting ocular dominance is the preference of one eye over the other in terms of sighting. In this study, our aim was to examine differences in interocular and intraocular macular thickness, interocular fovea-optic disc angle, and foveal blood vessel asymmetries associated with sighting ocular dominance. Ninety eyes of 45 healthy young adults were included in this prospective, cross-sectional, and comparative study. Sighting ocular dominance was determined by a hole-in-the-card test. Macular thickness measurements were taken and posterior pole asymmetry analysis conducted with spectral domain optical coherence tomography. The optic disc–fovea angle and visible foveal blood vessel counts were calculated by using the posterior pole retinal images of optical coherence tomography. The mean age of the participants was 27.3 (standard deviation [SD] 6.6) years. There were 20 males and 25 females. The mean total macular area thickness, and mean macular thickness of the superior and inferior hemispheres of the dominant and nondominant eyes were similar (p > 0.05). Macular asymmetry analysis revealed no statistically significant interocular difference (p > 0.05). In the dominant eyes, the mean optic disc–fovea angle was 5.24° (SD 1.77), whereas it was 5.49° (SD 2.58) in the nondominant eyes (p = 0.51). The number of visible blood vessels passing through the fovea was similar in the dominant and nondominant eyes (p > 0.05). These results suggested that interocular and intraocular macular thickness differences, interocular fovea–optic disc angle differences, and number of visible foveal blood vessels are not associated with sighting ocular dominance.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1607551X14001764Fovea–optic disc angleFoveal blood vesselsMacular thicknessPosterior pole asymmetrySighting ocular dominance
spellingShingle Gökhan Pekel
Semra Acer
Fatih Özbakis
Ramazan Yagci
Nihat Sayin
Macular asymmetry analysis in sighting ocular dominance
Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences
Fovea–optic disc angle
Foveal blood vessels
Macular thickness
Posterior pole asymmetry
Sighting ocular dominance
title Macular asymmetry analysis in sighting ocular dominance
title_full Macular asymmetry analysis in sighting ocular dominance
title_fullStr Macular asymmetry analysis in sighting ocular dominance
title_full_unstemmed Macular asymmetry analysis in sighting ocular dominance
title_short Macular asymmetry analysis in sighting ocular dominance
title_sort macular asymmetry analysis in sighting ocular dominance
topic Fovea–optic disc angle
Foveal blood vessels
Macular thickness
Posterior pole asymmetry
Sighting ocular dominance
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1607551X14001764
work_keys_str_mv AT gokhanpekel macularasymmetryanalysisinsightingoculardominance
AT semraacer macularasymmetryanalysisinsightingoculardominance
AT fatihozbakis macularasymmetryanalysisinsightingoculardominance
AT ramazanyagci macularasymmetryanalysisinsightingoculardominance
AT nihatsayin macularasymmetryanalysisinsightingoculardominance