Recanalization treatment for acute ischemic stroke: 3-month outcome before and after implementation of routine endovascular treatment

Background and purpose: Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke has become a recommended treatment option for selected patients after several randomized controlled trials have shown the effectiveness of endovascular treatment. Due to the nature of randomized clinical trials, the generalizab...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kati Valkonen, Nicolas Martinez-Majander, Gerli Sibolt, Marjaana Tiainen, Silja Räty, Tatu Kokkonen, Kimmo Lappalainen, Sami Curtze
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-06-01
Series:eNeurologicalSci
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240565022200003X
_version_ 1818252658642780160
author Kati Valkonen
Nicolas Martinez-Majander
Gerli Sibolt
Marjaana Tiainen
Silja Räty
Tatu Kokkonen
Kimmo Lappalainen
Sami Curtze
author_facet Kati Valkonen
Nicolas Martinez-Majander
Gerli Sibolt
Marjaana Tiainen
Silja Räty
Tatu Kokkonen
Kimmo Lappalainen
Sami Curtze
author_sort Kati Valkonen
collection DOAJ
description Background and purpose: Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke has become a recommended treatment option for selected patients after several randomized controlled trials have shown the effectiveness of endovascular treatment. Due to the nature of randomized clinical trials, the generalizability to population based real life settings and the resulting benefits remain difficult to estimate. Methods: We included 896 consecutive patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) within 4.5 h of stroke onset between January 2016 and December 2018, who were treated with additional endovascular treatment according to the new evidence when indicated (new-IVT-cohort). This cohort was compared to 913 intravenous thrombolysis patients treated in the 4.5 h time-window between January 2011 and December 2013 before the era of endovascular treatment (old-IVT-cohort). Results: In the new-IVT-cohort there were 253 intravenous thrombolysis + endovascular treatment treated patients. The new-IVT-cohort was associated with a better outcome on the modified Rankin Scale at 3 months in univariable ordinal regression (OR 1.27; 95% CI 1.08–1.49). The association remained significant (OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.27–2.14) also after adjustment for following confounding factors: sex, NIHSS, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, coronary artery disease, hypercholesterolemia, myocardial infarction, heart failure, history of ischemic stroke, history of TIA, and use of antithrombotic, statins, antihypertensive, anticoagulation treatment, or endovascular treatment (Fig. 1). Conclusion: We were able to verify the efficacy of endovascular treatment in a real life cohort of intravenous thrombolysis patients even when only 28% of the patients are eligible for endovascular treatment on top of intravenous thrombolysis treatment.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T16:27:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4caeff8c04b04d11bafb8afe7a374d5e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2405-6502
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T16:27:41Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series eNeurologicalSci
spelling doaj.art-4caeff8c04b04d11bafb8afe7a374d5e2022-12-22T00:18:51ZengElseviereNeurologicalSci2405-65022022-06-0127100394Recanalization treatment for acute ischemic stroke: 3-month outcome before and after implementation of routine endovascular treatmentKati Valkonen0Nicolas Martinez-Majander1Gerli Sibolt2Marjaana Tiainen3Silja Räty4Tatu Kokkonen5Kimmo Lappalainen6Sami Curtze7Departments of Neurology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Finland; Corresponding author at: Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, P.O. Box 340, Finland.Departments of Neurology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, FinlandDepartments of Neurology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, FinlandDepartments of Neurology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, FinlandDepartments of Neurology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, FinlandDepartments of Neuroradiology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, FinlandDepartments of Neuroradiology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, FinlandDepartments of Neurology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, FinlandBackground and purpose: Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke has become a recommended treatment option for selected patients after several randomized controlled trials have shown the effectiveness of endovascular treatment. Due to the nature of randomized clinical trials, the generalizability to population based real life settings and the resulting benefits remain difficult to estimate. Methods: We included 896 consecutive patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) within 4.5 h of stroke onset between January 2016 and December 2018, who were treated with additional endovascular treatment according to the new evidence when indicated (new-IVT-cohort). This cohort was compared to 913 intravenous thrombolysis patients treated in the 4.5 h time-window between January 2011 and December 2013 before the era of endovascular treatment (old-IVT-cohort). Results: In the new-IVT-cohort there were 253 intravenous thrombolysis + endovascular treatment treated patients. The new-IVT-cohort was associated with a better outcome on the modified Rankin Scale at 3 months in univariable ordinal regression (OR 1.27; 95% CI 1.08–1.49). The association remained significant (OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.27–2.14) also after adjustment for following confounding factors: sex, NIHSS, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, coronary artery disease, hypercholesterolemia, myocardial infarction, heart failure, history of ischemic stroke, history of TIA, and use of antithrombotic, statins, antihypertensive, anticoagulation treatment, or endovascular treatment (Fig. 1). Conclusion: We were able to verify the efficacy of endovascular treatment in a real life cohort of intravenous thrombolysis patients even when only 28% of the patients are eligible for endovascular treatment on top of intravenous thrombolysis treatment.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240565022200003XIntravenous thrombolysisIschemic strokeFunctional outcomeEndovascular treatment
spellingShingle Kati Valkonen
Nicolas Martinez-Majander
Gerli Sibolt
Marjaana Tiainen
Silja Räty
Tatu Kokkonen
Kimmo Lappalainen
Sami Curtze
Recanalization treatment for acute ischemic stroke: 3-month outcome before and after implementation of routine endovascular treatment
eNeurologicalSci
Intravenous thrombolysis
Ischemic stroke
Functional outcome
Endovascular treatment
title Recanalization treatment for acute ischemic stroke: 3-month outcome before and after implementation of routine endovascular treatment
title_full Recanalization treatment for acute ischemic stroke: 3-month outcome before and after implementation of routine endovascular treatment
title_fullStr Recanalization treatment for acute ischemic stroke: 3-month outcome before and after implementation of routine endovascular treatment
title_full_unstemmed Recanalization treatment for acute ischemic stroke: 3-month outcome before and after implementation of routine endovascular treatment
title_short Recanalization treatment for acute ischemic stroke: 3-month outcome before and after implementation of routine endovascular treatment
title_sort recanalization treatment for acute ischemic stroke 3 month outcome before and after implementation of routine endovascular treatment
topic Intravenous thrombolysis
Ischemic stroke
Functional outcome
Endovascular treatment
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240565022200003X
work_keys_str_mv AT kativalkonen recanalizationtreatmentforacuteischemicstroke3monthoutcomebeforeandafterimplementationofroutineendovasculartreatment
AT nicolasmartinezmajander recanalizationtreatmentforacuteischemicstroke3monthoutcomebeforeandafterimplementationofroutineendovasculartreatment
AT gerlisibolt recanalizationtreatmentforacuteischemicstroke3monthoutcomebeforeandafterimplementationofroutineendovasculartreatment
AT marjaanatiainen recanalizationtreatmentforacuteischemicstroke3monthoutcomebeforeandafterimplementationofroutineendovasculartreatment
AT siljaraty recanalizationtreatmentforacuteischemicstroke3monthoutcomebeforeandafterimplementationofroutineendovasculartreatment
AT tatukokkonen recanalizationtreatmentforacuteischemicstroke3monthoutcomebeforeandafterimplementationofroutineendovasculartreatment
AT kimmolappalainen recanalizationtreatmentforacuteischemicstroke3monthoutcomebeforeandafterimplementationofroutineendovasculartreatment
AT samicurtze recanalizationtreatmentforacuteischemicstroke3monthoutcomebeforeandafterimplementationofroutineendovasculartreatment