Developmental progression of lymphatic valve morphology and function

Introduction: The bileaflet valves found in collecting lymphatic vessels and some veins are essential for maintaining a unidirectional flow, which is important for lymphatic and venous function. Under an adverse pressure gradient, the two leaflets tightly overlap to prevent backflow. Valves are prop...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael J. Davis, Scott D. Zawieja, Ying Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2024.1331291/full
_version_ 1797301650935775232
author Michael J. Davis
Scott D. Zawieja
Ying Yang
author_facet Michael J. Davis
Scott D. Zawieja
Ying Yang
author_sort Michael J. Davis
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: The bileaflet valves found in collecting lymphatic vessels and some veins are essential for maintaining a unidirectional flow, which is important for lymphatic and venous function. Under an adverse pressure gradient, the two leaflets tightly overlap to prevent backflow. Valves are proposed to share four main stages of development, based on images obtained from randomly oriented valves in fixed mouse embryos, with the best structural views obtained from larger venous valves. It is not known at what stage lymphatic valves (LVs) become functional (e.g., able to oppose backflow), although a requirement for stage 4 is presumed.Methods: To gain an insight into this sequence of events for LVs, we used Prox1CreERT2:Foxo1fl/fl mice and Foxc2CreERT2:Foxo1fl/fl mouse models, in which deletion of the valve repressor factor Foxo1 promotes the development of new LVs in adult lymphatic vessels. Both strains also contained a Prox1eGFP reporter to image the lymphatic endothelium. Mesenteric collecting lymphatic vessels were dissected, cannulated, and pressurized for ex vivo tests of valve function. LVs at various stages (1–4 and intermediate) were identified in multi-valve segments, which were subsequently shortened to perform the backleak test on single valves. The GFP signal was then imaged at high magnification using a confocal microscope. Z-stack reconstructions enabled 1:1 comparisons of LV morphology with a quantitative measurement of back leak.Results: As expected, LVs of stages 1–3 were completely leaky in response to outflow pressure elevation. Stage 4 valves were generally not leaky, but valve integrity depended on the Cre line used to induce new valve formation. A high percentage of valves at leaflet an intermediate stage (3.5), in which there was an insertion of a second commissure, but without proper luminal alignment, effectively resisted back leak when the outflow pressure was increased.Discussion: Our findings represent the first 3D images of developing lymphatic valves and indicate that valves become competent between stages 3 and 4 of development.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T23:25:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4cb570c36d024590989bfb4c20d131d6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-634X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T23:25:35Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
spelling doaj.art-4cb570c36d024590989bfb4c20d131d62024-02-21T04:32:45ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology2296-634X2024-02-011210.3389/fcell.2024.13312911331291Developmental progression of lymphatic valve morphology and functionMichael J. Davis0Scott D. Zawieja1Ying Yang2Department of Medical Pharmacology and Physiology, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, United StatesDepartment of Medical Pharmacology and Physiology, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, United StatesDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Physiology, USF Health Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United StatesIntroduction: The bileaflet valves found in collecting lymphatic vessels and some veins are essential for maintaining a unidirectional flow, which is important for lymphatic and venous function. Under an adverse pressure gradient, the two leaflets tightly overlap to prevent backflow. Valves are proposed to share four main stages of development, based on images obtained from randomly oriented valves in fixed mouse embryos, with the best structural views obtained from larger venous valves. It is not known at what stage lymphatic valves (LVs) become functional (e.g., able to oppose backflow), although a requirement for stage 4 is presumed.Methods: To gain an insight into this sequence of events for LVs, we used Prox1CreERT2:Foxo1fl/fl mice and Foxc2CreERT2:Foxo1fl/fl mouse models, in which deletion of the valve repressor factor Foxo1 promotes the development of new LVs in adult lymphatic vessels. Both strains also contained a Prox1eGFP reporter to image the lymphatic endothelium. Mesenteric collecting lymphatic vessels were dissected, cannulated, and pressurized for ex vivo tests of valve function. LVs at various stages (1–4 and intermediate) were identified in multi-valve segments, which were subsequently shortened to perform the backleak test on single valves. The GFP signal was then imaged at high magnification using a confocal microscope. Z-stack reconstructions enabled 1:1 comparisons of LV morphology with a quantitative measurement of back leak.Results: As expected, LVs of stages 1–3 were completely leaky in response to outflow pressure elevation. Stage 4 valves were generally not leaky, but valve integrity depended on the Cre line used to induce new valve formation. A high percentage of valves at leaflet an intermediate stage (3.5), in which there was an insertion of a second commissure, but without proper luminal alignment, effectively resisted back leak when the outflow pressure was increased.Discussion: Our findings represent the first 3D images of developing lymphatic valves and indicate that valves become competent between stages 3 and 4 of development.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2024.1331291/fullvalve functionback leakannulusProx13D imagecommissure
spellingShingle Michael J. Davis
Scott D. Zawieja
Ying Yang
Developmental progression of lymphatic valve morphology and function
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
valve function
back leak
annulus
Prox1
3D image
commissure
title Developmental progression of lymphatic valve morphology and function
title_full Developmental progression of lymphatic valve morphology and function
title_fullStr Developmental progression of lymphatic valve morphology and function
title_full_unstemmed Developmental progression of lymphatic valve morphology and function
title_short Developmental progression of lymphatic valve morphology and function
title_sort developmental progression of lymphatic valve morphology and function
topic valve function
back leak
annulus
Prox1
3D image
commissure
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2024.1331291/full
work_keys_str_mv AT michaeljdavis developmentalprogressionoflymphaticvalvemorphologyandfunction
AT scottdzawieja developmentalprogressionoflymphaticvalvemorphologyandfunction
AT yingyang developmentalprogressionoflymphaticvalvemorphologyandfunction