A critical review of interventional treatments for myofascial pelvic pain

Chronic pelvic pain affects between 6% and 25% of women. It is a complex condition that has multifactorial etiologies, including but not limited to conditions arising from the gynecologic, urologic, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, neurologic, and psychologic systems. In this literature review, we...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aaron Lin, Hadeer Abbas, Maryam Sultan, Tony Tzeng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Health - Lippincott Williams Wilkins 2022-01-01
Series:The Journal of the International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jisprm.org/article.asp?issn=2349-7904;year=2022;volume=5;issue=2;spage=41;epage=45;aulast=Lin
_version_ 1797281184951042048
author Aaron Lin
Hadeer Abbas
Maryam Sultan
Tony Tzeng
author_facet Aaron Lin
Hadeer Abbas
Maryam Sultan
Tony Tzeng
author_sort Aaron Lin
collection DOAJ
description Chronic pelvic pain affects between 6% and 25% of women. It is a complex condition that has multifactorial etiologies, including but not limited to conditions arising from the gynecologic, urologic, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, neurologic, and psychologic systems. In this literature review, we examine and summarize evidence for interventional treatments compared to conservative treatments for women with musculoskeletal or myofascial pelvic pain. Searches were performed in PubMed and Embase databases. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials with a treatment arm of physical therapy, dry needling, trigger point injection (TPI), or injection with botulinum toxin. A total of 106 studies were returned with our search terms, and six articles were included in this review. These studies suggest that pelvic floor physical therapy, dry needling of abdominal wall trigger points, and TPI to abdominal wall and pelvic floor trigger points have some evidence as being effective for treatment of pelvic pain. The evidence for treatment with botulinum toxin was not as robust and also had higher rates of adverse events when compared to other interventions. Most of these studies are limited by small sample sizes and varied baseline demographics, which makes generalization of these findings to different patient populations difficult. In general, treatments for myofascial pelvic pain are low-risk and are effective in reducing myofascial pelvic pain.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T16:52:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4cbac6b8f80e4f938cb09542ba182103
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2589-9457
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T16:52:58Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health - Lippincott Williams Wilkins
record_format Article
series The Journal of the International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
spelling doaj.art-4cbac6b8f80e4f938cb09542ba1821032024-03-03T04:31:25ZengWolters Kluwer Health - Lippincott Williams WilkinsThe Journal of the International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine2589-94572022-01-0152414510.4103/jisprm.JISPRM-000143A critical review of interventional treatments for myofascial pelvic painAaron LinHadeer AbbasMaryam SultanTony TzengChronic pelvic pain affects between 6% and 25% of women. It is a complex condition that has multifactorial etiologies, including but not limited to conditions arising from the gynecologic, urologic, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, neurologic, and psychologic systems. In this literature review, we examine and summarize evidence for interventional treatments compared to conservative treatments for women with musculoskeletal or myofascial pelvic pain. Searches were performed in PubMed and Embase databases. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials with a treatment arm of physical therapy, dry needling, trigger point injection (TPI), or injection with botulinum toxin. A total of 106 studies were returned with our search terms, and six articles were included in this review. These studies suggest that pelvic floor physical therapy, dry needling of abdominal wall trigger points, and TPI to abdominal wall and pelvic floor trigger points have some evidence as being effective for treatment of pelvic pain. The evidence for treatment with botulinum toxin was not as robust and also had higher rates of adverse events when compared to other interventions. Most of these studies are limited by small sample sizes and varied baseline demographics, which makes generalization of these findings to different patient populations difficult. In general, treatments for myofascial pelvic pain are low-risk and are effective in reducing myofascial pelvic pain.http://www.jisprm.org/article.asp?issn=2349-7904;year=2022;volume=5;issue=2;spage=41;epage=45;aulast=Linbotulinum toxin injectiondry needlingpelvic myofascial painpelvic painpelvic rehabilitationphysical medicine and rehabilitationphysical therapytrigger point injection
spellingShingle Aaron Lin
Hadeer Abbas
Maryam Sultan
Tony Tzeng
A critical review of interventional treatments for myofascial pelvic pain
The Journal of the International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
botulinum toxin injection
dry needling
pelvic myofascial pain
pelvic pain
pelvic rehabilitation
physical medicine and rehabilitation
physical therapy
trigger point injection
title A critical review of interventional treatments for myofascial pelvic pain
title_full A critical review of interventional treatments for myofascial pelvic pain
title_fullStr A critical review of interventional treatments for myofascial pelvic pain
title_full_unstemmed A critical review of interventional treatments for myofascial pelvic pain
title_short A critical review of interventional treatments for myofascial pelvic pain
title_sort critical review of interventional treatments for myofascial pelvic pain
topic botulinum toxin injection
dry needling
pelvic myofascial pain
pelvic pain
pelvic rehabilitation
physical medicine and rehabilitation
physical therapy
trigger point injection
url http://www.jisprm.org/article.asp?issn=2349-7904;year=2022;volume=5;issue=2;spage=41;epage=45;aulast=Lin
work_keys_str_mv AT aaronlin acriticalreviewofinterventionaltreatmentsformyofascialpelvicpain
AT hadeerabbas acriticalreviewofinterventionaltreatmentsformyofascialpelvicpain
AT maryamsultan acriticalreviewofinterventionaltreatmentsformyofascialpelvicpain
AT tonytzeng acriticalreviewofinterventionaltreatmentsformyofascialpelvicpain
AT aaronlin criticalreviewofinterventionaltreatmentsformyofascialpelvicpain
AT hadeerabbas criticalreviewofinterventionaltreatmentsformyofascialpelvicpain
AT maryamsultan criticalreviewofinterventionaltreatmentsformyofascialpelvicpain
AT tonytzeng criticalreviewofinterventionaltreatmentsformyofascialpelvicpain