A comparative study of lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty with buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in urethral stricture disease: An institutional experience

Aims: A prospective study to compare the outcomes of lingual versus buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in patients with long segment anterior urethral strictures disease. Materials and Methods: The study included 30 patients for buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty (group I) and 30 patients for lingua...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dilip Kumar Pal, Depak Kumar Gupta, Bastab Ghosh, Malay Kumar Bera
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-01-01
Series:Urology Annals
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2016;volume=8;issue=2;spage=157;epage=162;aulast=Pal
_version_ 1811229292396281856
author Dilip Kumar Pal
Depak Kumar Gupta
Bastab Ghosh
Malay Kumar Bera
author_facet Dilip Kumar Pal
Depak Kumar Gupta
Bastab Ghosh
Malay Kumar Bera
author_sort Dilip Kumar Pal
collection DOAJ
description Aims: A prospective study to compare the outcomes of lingual versus buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in patients with long segment anterior urethral strictures disease. Materials and Methods: The study included 30 patients for buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty (group I) and 30 patients for lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty (group II) for treatment of long segment (>3 cm) incomplete anterior urethral stricture disease using single-stage dorsal onlay free oral mucosal graft urethroplasty by Barbagli's technique between February 2013 to September 2014. All patients underwent complete evaluation of the stricture including inspection of the oral cavity. Results: The results of urethroplasty in between two group were not significant (P > 0.05) in terms of Qmax (P = 0.63), mean postoperative AUA symptom score (P = 0.83), operative time (P = 0.302) intra operative blood loss (P = 0.708), duration of postoperative hospitalization (P = 0.83), but slurring of speech complications was seen in group II, but not in group I. Long-term complications of salivary disturbance, tightness of the mouth, persistent pain at graft site, perioral numbness, seen only in group I (BMGU). Conclusion: LMG urethroplasty is an excellent alternative to BMG urethroplasty with comparable results of urethroplasty and minimal donor site complications.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T10:12:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4cc17aca422b4c7b93707e29f65632e3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0974-7796
0974-7834
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T10:12:08Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Urology Annals
spelling doaj.art-4cc17aca422b4c7b93707e29f65632e32022-12-22T03:37:17ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsUrology Annals0974-77960974-78342016-01-018215716210.4103/0974-7796.172214A comparative study of lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty with buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in urethral stricture disease: An institutional experienceDilip Kumar PalDepak Kumar GuptaBastab GhoshMalay Kumar BeraAims: A prospective study to compare the outcomes of lingual versus buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in patients with long segment anterior urethral strictures disease. Materials and Methods: The study included 30 patients for buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty (group I) and 30 patients for lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty (group II) for treatment of long segment (>3 cm) incomplete anterior urethral stricture disease using single-stage dorsal onlay free oral mucosal graft urethroplasty by Barbagli's technique between February 2013 to September 2014. All patients underwent complete evaluation of the stricture including inspection of the oral cavity. Results: The results of urethroplasty in between two group were not significant (P > 0.05) in terms of Qmax (P = 0.63), mean postoperative AUA symptom score (P = 0.83), operative time (P = 0.302) intra operative blood loss (P = 0.708), duration of postoperative hospitalization (P = 0.83), but slurring of speech complications was seen in group II, but not in group I. Long-term complications of salivary disturbance, tightness of the mouth, persistent pain at graft site, perioral numbness, seen only in group I (BMGU). Conclusion: LMG urethroplasty is an excellent alternative to BMG urethroplasty with comparable results of urethroplasty and minimal donor site complications.http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2016;volume=8;issue=2;spage=157;epage=162;aulast=PalBuccal mucosal graft urethroplasty, lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty, urethral stricture disease
spellingShingle Dilip Kumar Pal
Depak Kumar Gupta
Bastab Ghosh
Malay Kumar Bera
A comparative study of lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty with buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in urethral stricture disease: An institutional experience
Urology Annals
Buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty, lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty, urethral stricture disease
title A comparative study of lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty with buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in urethral stricture disease: An institutional experience
title_full A comparative study of lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty with buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in urethral stricture disease: An institutional experience
title_fullStr A comparative study of lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty with buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in urethral stricture disease: An institutional experience
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty with buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in urethral stricture disease: An institutional experience
title_short A comparative study of lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty with buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in urethral stricture disease: An institutional experience
title_sort comparative study of lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty with buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in urethral stricture disease an institutional experience
topic Buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty, lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty, urethral stricture disease
url http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2016;volume=8;issue=2;spage=157;epage=162;aulast=Pal
work_keys_str_mv AT dilipkumarpal acomparativestudyoflingualmucosalgrafturethroplastywithbuccalmucosalgrafturethroplastyinurethralstricturediseaseaninstitutionalexperience
AT depakkumargupta acomparativestudyoflingualmucosalgrafturethroplastywithbuccalmucosalgrafturethroplastyinurethralstricturediseaseaninstitutionalexperience
AT bastabghosh acomparativestudyoflingualmucosalgrafturethroplastywithbuccalmucosalgrafturethroplastyinurethralstricturediseaseaninstitutionalexperience
AT malaykumarbera acomparativestudyoflingualmucosalgrafturethroplastywithbuccalmucosalgrafturethroplastyinurethralstricturediseaseaninstitutionalexperience
AT dilipkumarpal comparativestudyoflingualmucosalgrafturethroplastywithbuccalmucosalgrafturethroplastyinurethralstricturediseaseaninstitutionalexperience
AT depakkumargupta comparativestudyoflingualmucosalgrafturethroplastywithbuccalmucosalgrafturethroplastyinurethralstricturediseaseaninstitutionalexperience
AT bastabghosh comparativestudyoflingualmucosalgrafturethroplastywithbuccalmucosalgrafturethroplastyinurethralstricturediseaseaninstitutionalexperience
AT malaykumarbera comparativestudyoflingualmucosalgrafturethroplastywithbuccalmucosalgrafturethroplastyinurethralstricturediseaseaninstitutionalexperience