Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of uncemented CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia three-unit restorations in anterior areas, using scannable and conventional polyvinyl siloxane impression materials
Abstract Background The accuracy of impression techniques determines the marginal fit of fixed prostheses. Marginal accuracy plays a main role in the success and failure of treatments. This in-vivo study evaluated the marginal fit of anterior three-unit monolithic zirconia fixed partial dentures (FP...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | BMC Oral Health |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02771-z |
| _version_ | 1811171500212879360 |
|---|---|
| author | Mohammad Hassan Kalantari Benika Abbasi Rashin Giti Zahra Rastegar Saeid Tavanafar Sheila Shahsavari-pour |
| author_facet | Mohammad Hassan Kalantari Benika Abbasi Rashin Giti Zahra Rastegar Saeid Tavanafar Sheila Shahsavari-pour |
| author_sort | Mohammad Hassan Kalantari |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background The accuracy of impression techniques determines the marginal fit of fixed prostheses. Marginal accuracy plays a main role in the success and failure of treatments. This in-vivo study evaluated the marginal fit of anterior three-unit monolithic zirconia fixed partial dentures (FPDs) using conventional and scannable polyvinyl siloxane impression materials. Methods Ten patients were selected to replace the lateral teeth with a three-unit monolithic zirconia bridge. For each patient, in the first group, an impression was made with a two-step putty-wash technique using scannable polyvinyl siloxane material (BONASCAN; DMP, Greece). In the identical session, as the second group, an impression of conventional putty-wash polyvinyl siloxane was taken (BONASIL A+ Putty; DMP, Greece). The marginal discrepancy was measured through the replicas, which were cut perpendicularly within the buccolingual and mesiodistal directions. An Independent t-test was employed for data analyses (P < 0.05). Results The marginal discrepancy in a conventional method for central abutment in mid-buccal, mid-lingual, mid-mesial, and mid-distal was higher than in the scannable method but it was not significant (P > 0.05). Also, the marginal discrepancy for canine abutment in the conventional method was higher than in the scannable method, but it was not significant, either (P > 0.05). Conclusions FPDs fabricated from both scannable and conventional impression materials were not superior to each other in marginal fit for both central and canine abutments by evaluation using the replica technique. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T17:15:00Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-4cc63b3648644a5fb7583541c54c372b |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1472-6831 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T17:15:00Z |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Oral Health |
| spelling | doaj.art-4cc63b3648644a5fb7583541c54c372b2023-02-05T12:25:44ZengBMCBMC Oral Health1472-68312023-01-012311710.1186/s12903-023-02771-zClinical evaluation of marginal fit of uncemented CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia three-unit restorations in anterior areas, using scannable and conventional polyvinyl siloxane impression materialsMohammad Hassan Kalantari0Benika Abbasi1Rashin Giti2Zahra Rastegar3Saeid Tavanafar4Sheila Shahsavari-pour5Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical ScienceDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical ScienceDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical ScienceDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical ScienceDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Birjand University of Medical SciencesDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical ScienceAbstract Background The accuracy of impression techniques determines the marginal fit of fixed prostheses. Marginal accuracy plays a main role in the success and failure of treatments. This in-vivo study evaluated the marginal fit of anterior three-unit monolithic zirconia fixed partial dentures (FPDs) using conventional and scannable polyvinyl siloxane impression materials. Methods Ten patients were selected to replace the lateral teeth with a three-unit monolithic zirconia bridge. For each patient, in the first group, an impression was made with a two-step putty-wash technique using scannable polyvinyl siloxane material (BONASCAN; DMP, Greece). In the identical session, as the second group, an impression of conventional putty-wash polyvinyl siloxane was taken (BONASIL A+ Putty; DMP, Greece). The marginal discrepancy was measured through the replicas, which were cut perpendicularly within the buccolingual and mesiodistal directions. An Independent t-test was employed for data analyses (P < 0.05). Results The marginal discrepancy in a conventional method for central abutment in mid-buccal, mid-lingual, mid-mesial, and mid-distal was higher than in the scannable method but it was not significant (P > 0.05). Also, the marginal discrepancy for canine abutment in the conventional method was higher than in the scannable method, but it was not significant, either (P > 0.05). Conclusions FPDs fabricated from both scannable and conventional impression materials were not superior to each other in marginal fit for both central and canine abutments by evaluation using the replica technique.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02771-zMarginal fitMonolithic zirconiaFPDScannable impression materials–conventional impression material |
| spellingShingle | Mohammad Hassan Kalantari Benika Abbasi Rashin Giti Zahra Rastegar Saeid Tavanafar Sheila Shahsavari-pour Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of uncemented CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia three-unit restorations in anterior areas, using scannable and conventional polyvinyl siloxane impression materials BMC Oral Health Marginal fit Monolithic zirconia FPD Scannable impression materials–conventional impression material |
| title | Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of uncemented CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia three-unit restorations in anterior areas, using scannable and conventional polyvinyl siloxane impression materials |
| title_full | Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of uncemented CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia three-unit restorations in anterior areas, using scannable and conventional polyvinyl siloxane impression materials |
| title_fullStr | Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of uncemented CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia three-unit restorations in anterior areas, using scannable and conventional polyvinyl siloxane impression materials |
| title_full_unstemmed | Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of uncemented CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia three-unit restorations in anterior areas, using scannable and conventional polyvinyl siloxane impression materials |
| title_short | Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of uncemented CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia three-unit restorations in anterior areas, using scannable and conventional polyvinyl siloxane impression materials |
| title_sort | clinical evaluation of marginal fit of uncemented cad cam monolithic zirconia three unit restorations in anterior areas using scannable and conventional polyvinyl siloxane impression materials |
| topic | Marginal fit Monolithic zirconia FPD Scannable impression materials–conventional impression material |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02771-z |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mohammadhassankalantari clinicalevaluationofmarginalfitofuncementedcadcammonolithiczirconiathreeunitrestorationsinanteriorareasusingscannableandconventionalpolyvinylsiloxaneimpressionmaterials AT benikaabbasi clinicalevaluationofmarginalfitofuncementedcadcammonolithiczirconiathreeunitrestorationsinanteriorareasusingscannableandconventionalpolyvinylsiloxaneimpressionmaterials AT rashingiti clinicalevaluationofmarginalfitofuncementedcadcammonolithiczirconiathreeunitrestorationsinanteriorareasusingscannableandconventionalpolyvinylsiloxaneimpressionmaterials AT zahrarastegar clinicalevaluationofmarginalfitofuncementedcadcammonolithiczirconiathreeunitrestorationsinanteriorareasusingscannableandconventionalpolyvinylsiloxaneimpressionmaterials AT saeidtavanafar clinicalevaluationofmarginalfitofuncementedcadcammonolithiczirconiathreeunitrestorationsinanteriorareasusingscannableandconventionalpolyvinylsiloxaneimpressionmaterials AT sheilashahsavaripour clinicalevaluationofmarginalfitofuncementedcadcammonolithiczirconiathreeunitrestorationsinanteriorareasusingscannableandconventionalpolyvinylsiloxaneimpressionmaterials |