A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Physical inactivity is one of the four leading risk factors for global mortality. Accurate measurement of physical activity (PA) and in particular by physical activity questionnaires (PAQs) remains a challenge. The aim of this paper is to provide an updated syste...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Helmerhorst Hendrik JF, Brage Søren, Warren Janet, Besson Herve, Ekelund Ulf
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-08-01
Series:International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/9/1/103
_version_ 1818807632177135616
author Helmerhorst Hendrik JF
Brage Søren
Warren Janet
Besson Herve
Ekelund Ulf
author_facet Helmerhorst Hendrik JF
Brage Søren
Warren Janet
Besson Herve
Ekelund Ulf
author_sort Helmerhorst Hendrik JF
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Physical inactivity is one of the four leading risk factors for global mortality. Accurate measurement of physical activity (PA) and in particular by physical activity questionnaires (PAQs) remains a challenge. The aim of this paper is to provide an updated systematic review of the reliability and validity characteristics of existing and more recently developed PAQs and to quantitatively compare the performance between existing and newly developed PAQs.</p> <p>A literature search of electronic databases was performed for studies assessing reliability and validity data of PAQs using an objective criterion measurement of PA between January 1997 and December 2011. Articles meeting the inclusion criteria were screened and data were extracted to provide a systematic overview of measurement properties. Due to differences in reported outcomes and criterion methods a quantitative meta-analysis was not possible.</p> <p>In total, 31 studies testing 34 newly developed PAQs, and 65 studies examining 96 existing PAQs were included. Very few PAQs showed good results on both reliability and validity. Median reliability correlation coefficients were 0.62–0.71 for existing, and 0.74–0.76 for new PAQs. Median validity coefficients ranged from 0.30–0.39 for existing, and from 0.25–0.41 for new PAQs.</p> <p>Although the majority of PAQs appear to have acceptable reliability, the validity is moderate at best. Newly developed PAQs do not appear to perform substantially better than existing PAQs in terms of reliability and validity. Future PAQ studies should include measures of absolute validity and the error structure of the instrument.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-18T19:28:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4cc771aec21a44e393e415451c5b23b4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1479-5868
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T19:28:45Z
publishDate 2012-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
spelling doaj.art-4cc771aec21a44e393e415451c5b23b42022-12-21T20:55:46ZengBMCInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity1479-58682012-08-019110310.1186/1479-5868-9-103A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnairesHelmerhorst Hendrik JFBrage SørenWarren JanetBesson HerveEkelund Ulf<p>Abstract</p> <p>Physical inactivity is one of the four leading risk factors for global mortality. Accurate measurement of physical activity (PA) and in particular by physical activity questionnaires (PAQs) remains a challenge. The aim of this paper is to provide an updated systematic review of the reliability and validity characteristics of existing and more recently developed PAQs and to quantitatively compare the performance between existing and newly developed PAQs.</p> <p>A literature search of electronic databases was performed for studies assessing reliability and validity data of PAQs using an objective criterion measurement of PA between January 1997 and December 2011. Articles meeting the inclusion criteria were screened and data were extracted to provide a systematic overview of measurement properties. Due to differences in reported outcomes and criterion methods a quantitative meta-analysis was not possible.</p> <p>In total, 31 studies testing 34 newly developed PAQs, and 65 studies examining 96 existing PAQs were included. Very few PAQs showed good results on both reliability and validity. Median reliability correlation coefficients were 0.62–0.71 for existing, and 0.74–0.76 for new PAQs. Median validity coefficients ranged from 0.30–0.39 for existing, and from 0.25–0.41 for new PAQs.</p> <p>Although the majority of PAQs appear to have acceptable reliability, the validity is moderate at best. Newly developed PAQs do not appear to perform substantially better than existing PAQs in terms of reliability and validity. Future PAQ studies should include measures of absolute validity and the error structure of the instrument.</p>http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/9/1/103Systematic reviewPhysical activitySelf-reportAccelerometryValidityReliability
spellingShingle Helmerhorst Hendrik JF
Brage Søren
Warren Janet
Besson Herve
Ekelund Ulf
A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Systematic review
Physical activity
Self-report
Accelerometry
Validity
Reliability
title A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires
title_full A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires
title_fullStr A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires
title_short A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires
title_sort systematic review of reliability and objective criterion related validity of physical activity questionnaires
topic Systematic review
Physical activity
Self-report
Accelerometry
Validity
Reliability
url http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/9/1/103
work_keys_str_mv AT helmerhorsthendrikjf asystematicreviewofreliabilityandobjectivecriterionrelatedvalidityofphysicalactivityquestionnaires
AT bragesøren asystematicreviewofreliabilityandobjectivecriterionrelatedvalidityofphysicalactivityquestionnaires
AT warrenjanet asystematicreviewofreliabilityandobjectivecriterionrelatedvalidityofphysicalactivityquestionnaires
AT bessonherve asystematicreviewofreliabilityandobjectivecriterionrelatedvalidityofphysicalactivityquestionnaires
AT ekelundulf asystematicreviewofreliabilityandobjectivecriterionrelatedvalidityofphysicalactivityquestionnaires
AT helmerhorsthendrikjf systematicreviewofreliabilityandobjectivecriterionrelatedvalidityofphysicalactivityquestionnaires
AT bragesøren systematicreviewofreliabilityandobjectivecriterionrelatedvalidityofphysicalactivityquestionnaires
AT warrenjanet systematicreviewofreliabilityandobjectivecriterionrelatedvalidityofphysicalactivityquestionnaires
AT bessonherve systematicreviewofreliabilityandobjectivecriterionrelatedvalidityofphysicalactivityquestionnaires
AT ekelundulf systematicreviewofreliabilityandobjectivecriterionrelatedvalidityofphysicalactivityquestionnaires