Posttreatment after Lenvatinib in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background: There is no standard posttreatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in whom lenvatinib therapy has failed. This study aimed to investigate rates of migration to posttreatment after lenvatinib and to explore candidates for second-line agents in the patients with f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Keisuke Koroki, Naoya Kanogawa, Susumu Maruta, Sadahisa Ogasawara, Yotaro Iino, Masamichi Obu, Tomomi Okubo, Norio Itokawa, Takahiro Maeda, Masanori Inoue, Yuki Haga, Atsuyoshi Seki, Shinichiro Okabe, Yoshihiro Koma, Ryosaku Azemoto, Masanori Atsukawa, Ei Itobayashi, Kenji Ito, Nobuyuki Sugiura, Hideaki Mizumoto, Hidemi Unozawa, Terunao Iwanaga, Takafumi Sakuma, Naoto Fujita, Hiroaki Kanzaki, Kazufumi Kobayashi, Soichiro Kiyono, Masato Nakamura, Tomoko Saito, Takayuki Kondo, Eiichiro Suzuki, Yoshihiko Ooka, Shingo Nakamoto, Akinobu Tawada, Tetsuhiro Chiba, Makoto Arai, Tatsuo Kanda, Hitoshi Maruyama, Jun Kato, Naoya Kato
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Karger Publishers 2021-04-01
Series:Liver Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/515552
_version_ 1819015446174629888
author Keisuke Koroki
Naoya Kanogawa
Susumu Maruta
Sadahisa Ogasawara
Yotaro Iino
Masamichi Obu
Tomomi Okubo
Norio Itokawa
Takahiro Maeda
Masanori Inoue
Yuki Haga
Atsuyoshi Seki
Shinichiro Okabe
Yoshihiro Koma
Ryosaku Azemoto
Masanori Atsukawa
Ei Itobayashi
Kenji Ito
Nobuyuki Sugiura
Hideaki Mizumoto
Hidemi Unozawa
Terunao Iwanaga
Takafumi Sakuma
Naoto Fujita
Hiroaki Kanzaki
Kazufumi Kobayashi
Soichiro Kiyono
Masato Nakamura
Tomoko Saito
Takayuki Kondo
Eiichiro Suzuki
Yoshihiko Ooka
Shingo Nakamoto
Akinobu Tawada
Tetsuhiro Chiba
Makoto Arai
Tatsuo Kanda
Hitoshi Maruyama
Jun Kato
Naoya Kato
author_facet Keisuke Koroki
Naoya Kanogawa
Susumu Maruta
Sadahisa Ogasawara
Yotaro Iino
Masamichi Obu
Tomomi Okubo
Norio Itokawa
Takahiro Maeda
Masanori Inoue
Yuki Haga
Atsuyoshi Seki
Shinichiro Okabe
Yoshihiro Koma
Ryosaku Azemoto
Masanori Atsukawa
Ei Itobayashi
Kenji Ito
Nobuyuki Sugiura
Hideaki Mizumoto
Hidemi Unozawa
Terunao Iwanaga
Takafumi Sakuma
Naoto Fujita
Hiroaki Kanzaki
Kazufumi Kobayashi
Soichiro Kiyono
Masato Nakamura
Tomoko Saito
Takayuki Kondo
Eiichiro Suzuki
Yoshihiko Ooka
Shingo Nakamoto
Akinobu Tawada
Tetsuhiro Chiba
Makoto Arai
Tatsuo Kanda
Hitoshi Maruyama
Jun Kato
Naoya Kato
author_sort Keisuke Koroki
collection DOAJ
description Background: There is no standard posttreatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in whom lenvatinib therapy has failed. This study aimed to investigate rates of migration to posttreatment after lenvatinib and to explore candidates for second-line agents in the patients with failed lenvatinib therapy. Methods: We retrospectively collected data on patients with advanced HCC who received lenvatinib as the first-line agent in 7 institutions. Results: Overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) of 178 patients who received lenvatinib as the first-line agent were 13.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.5–15.2) and 6.7 months (95% CI, 5.6–7.8), respectively. Sixty-nine of 151 patients (45.7%) who discontinued lenvatinib moved on to posttreatment. The migration rates from lenvatinib to the second-line agent and from the second-line agent to the third-line agent were 41.7 and 44.4%, respectively. Based on multivariate analysis, response to lenvatinib (complete or partial response according to modified RECIST) and discontinuation of lenvatinib due to radiological progression, as well as male were associated with a significantly higher probability of migration to posttreatment after lenvatinib. On the other hand, alpha-fetoprotein levels of 400 ng/mL or higher was correlated with a significantly lower probability of migration to posttreatment after lenvatinib. Of 63 patients who received second-line systemic therapy, 53 (84.2%) were administered sorafenib. PFS, objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) for sorafenib treatment were 1.8 months (95% CI, 0.6–3.0), 1.8%, and 20.8%, respectively. According to the Cox regression hazard model, Child-Pugh class B significantly contributed to shorter PFS. PFS, ORR, and DCR of 22 patients who received regorafenib after lenvatinib in any lines were 3.2 months (range, 1.5–4.9 months), 13.6%, and 36.3%, respectively. Similarly, PFS, ORR, and DCR of 17 patients who received regorafenib after lenvatinib in the third-line (after sorafenib) were 3.8 months (range, 1.1–6.5 months), 17.6%, and 41.2%, respectively. Conclusion: Sorafenib may not be a candidate for use as a posttreatment agent after lenvatinib, according to the results of the present study. Regorafenib has the potential to become an appropriate posttreatment agent after lenvatinib.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T02:31:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4cc7f3182bb149d4bf42ff53cc56445b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2235-1795
1664-5553
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T02:31:52Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher Karger Publishers
record_format Article
series Liver Cancer
spelling doaj.art-4cc7f3182bb149d4bf42ff53cc56445b2022-12-21T19:18:54ZengKarger PublishersLiver Cancer2235-17951664-55532021-04-0111210.1159/000515552515552Posttreatment after Lenvatinib in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular CarcinomaKeisuke Koroki0Naoya Kanogawa1Susumu Maruta2Sadahisa Ogasawara3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6540-9064Yotaro Iino4Masamichi Obu5Tomomi Okubo6Norio Itokawa7Takahiro Maeda8Masanori Inoue9Yuki Haga10Atsuyoshi Seki11Shinichiro Okabe12Yoshihiro Koma13Ryosaku Azemoto14Masanori Atsukawa15Ei Itobayashi16Kenji Ito17Nobuyuki Sugiura18Hideaki Mizumoto19Hidemi Unozawa20Terunao Iwanaga21Takafumi Sakuma22Naoto Fujita23Hiroaki Kanzaki24Kazufumi Kobayashi25Soichiro Kiyono26Masato Nakamura27Tomoko Saito28Takayuki Kondo29Eiichiro Suzuki30Yoshihiko Ooka31Shingo Nakamoto32Akinobu Tawada33Tetsuhiro Chiba34Makoto Arai35Tatsuo Kanda36https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3740-5090Hitoshi Maruyama37Jun Kato38Naoya Kato39Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kimitsu Chuo Hospital, Kisarazu, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kimitsu Chuo Hospital, Kisarazu, JapanDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, Inzai, JapanDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, Inzai, JapanTranslational Research and Development Center, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, JapanTranslational Research and Development Center, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Chiba Medical Center, Chiba, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Funabashi Municipal Medical Center, Funabashi, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Matsudo City General Hospital, Matsudo, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kimitsu Chuo Hospital, Kisarazu, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kimitsu Chuo Hospital, Kisarazu, JapanDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, Inzai, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asahi General Hospital, Asahi, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Chiba Medical Center, Chiba, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Chiba Medical Center, Chiba, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Funabashi Municipal Medical Center, Funabashi, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, JapanBackground: There is no standard posttreatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in whom lenvatinib therapy has failed. This study aimed to investigate rates of migration to posttreatment after lenvatinib and to explore candidates for second-line agents in the patients with failed lenvatinib therapy. Methods: We retrospectively collected data on patients with advanced HCC who received lenvatinib as the first-line agent in 7 institutions. Results: Overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) of 178 patients who received lenvatinib as the first-line agent were 13.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.5–15.2) and 6.7 months (95% CI, 5.6–7.8), respectively. Sixty-nine of 151 patients (45.7%) who discontinued lenvatinib moved on to posttreatment. The migration rates from lenvatinib to the second-line agent and from the second-line agent to the third-line agent were 41.7 and 44.4%, respectively. Based on multivariate analysis, response to lenvatinib (complete or partial response according to modified RECIST) and discontinuation of lenvatinib due to radiological progression, as well as male were associated with a significantly higher probability of migration to posttreatment after lenvatinib. On the other hand, alpha-fetoprotein levels of 400 ng/mL or higher was correlated with a significantly lower probability of migration to posttreatment after lenvatinib. Of 63 patients who received second-line systemic therapy, 53 (84.2%) were administered sorafenib. PFS, objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) for sorafenib treatment were 1.8 months (95% CI, 0.6–3.0), 1.8%, and 20.8%, respectively. According to the Cox regression hazard model, Child-Pugh class B significantly contributed to shorter PFS. PFS, ORR, and DCR of 22 patients who received regorafenib after lenvatinib in any lines were 3.2 months (range, 1.5–4.9 months), 13.6%, and 36.3%, respectively. Similarly, PFS, ORR, and DCR of 17 patients who received regorafenib after lenvatinib in the third-line (after sorafenib) were 3.8 months (range, 1.1–6.5 months), 17.6%, and 41.2%, respectively. Conclusion: Sorafenib may not be a candidate for use as a posttreatment agent after lenvatinib, according to the results of the present study. Regorafenib has the potential to become an appropriate posttreatment agent after lenvatinib.https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/515552hepatocellular carcinomalenvatinibposttreatment
spellingShingle Keisuke Koroki
Naoya Kanogawa
Susumu Maruta
Sadahisa Ogasawara
Yotaro Iino
Masamichi Obu
Tomomi Okubo
Norio Itokawa
Takahiro Maeda
Masanori Inoue
Yuki Haga
Atsuyoshi Seki
Shinichiro Okabe
Yoshihiro Koma
Ryosaku Azemoto
Masanori Atsukawa
Ei Itobayashi
Kenji Ito
Nobuyuki Sugiura
Hideaki Mizumoto
Hidemi Unozawa
Terunao Iwanaga
Takafumi Sakuma
Naoto Fujita
Hiroaki Kanzaki
Kazufumi Kobayashi
Soichiro Kiyono
Masato Nakamura
Tomoko Saito
Takayuki Kondo
Eiichiro Suzuki
Yoshihiko Ooka
Shingo Nakamoto
Akinobu Tawada
Tetsuhiro Chiba
Makoto Arai
Tatsuo Kanda
Hitoshi Maruyama
Jun Kato
Naoya Kato
Posttreatment after Lenvatinib in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Liver Cancer
hepatocellular carcinoma
lenvatinib
posttreatment
title Posttreatment after Lenvatinib in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_full Posttreatment after Lenvatinib in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_fullStr Posttreatment after Lenvatinib in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Posttreatment after Lenvatinib in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_short Posttreatment after Lenvatinib in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_sort posttreatment after lenvatinib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
topic hepatocellular carcinoma
lenvatinib
posttreatment
url https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/515552
work_keys_str_mv AT keisukekoroki posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT naoyakanogawa posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT susumumaruta posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT sadahisaogasawara posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT yotaroiino posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT masamichiobu posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT tomomiokubo posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT norioitokawa posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT takahiromaeda posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT masanoriinoue posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT yukihaga posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT atsuyoshiseki posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT shinichirookabe posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT yoshihirokoma posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT ryosakuazemoto posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT masanoriatsukawa posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT eiitobayashi posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT kenjiito posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT nobuyukisugiura posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT hideakimizumoto posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT hidemiunozawa posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT terunaoiwanaga posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT takafumisakuma posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT naotofujita posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT hiroakikanzaki posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT kazufumikobayashi posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT soichirokiyono posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT masatonakamura posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT tomokosaito posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT takayukikondo posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT eiichirosuzuki posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT yoshihikoooka posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT shingonakamoto posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT akinobutawada posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT tetsuhirochiba posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT makotoarai posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT tatsuokanda posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT hitoshimaruyama posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT junkato posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT naoyakato posttreatmentafterlenvatinibinpatientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma