Comparison of LSTM and IndoBERT Method in Identifying Hoax on Twitter

In recent years, social media users have been increasing significantly, in January 2022 social media users in Indonesia reached 191 million people which has an increase of 12.35% from the previous year as many as 170 million people, With this massive increase every year, more and more people tend to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muhammad Ikram Kaer Sinapoy, Yuliant Sibaroni, Sri Suryani Prasetyowati
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ikatan Ahli Informatika Indonesia 2023-06-01
Series:Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi)
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jurnal.iaii.or.id/index.php/RESTI/article/view/4830
_version_ 1827362238574362624
author Muhammad Ikram Kaer Sinapoy
Yuliant Sibaroni
Sri Suryani Prasetyowati
author_facet Muhammad Ikram Kaer Sinapoy
Yuliant Sibaroni
Sri Suryani Prasetyowati
author_sort Muhammad Ikram Kaer Sinapoy
collection DOAJ
description In recent years, social media users have been increasing significantly, in January 2022 social media users in Indonesia reached 191 million people which has an increase of 12.35% from the previous year as many as 170 million people, With this massive increase every year, more and more people tend to seek and consume information through social media. Despite the many advantages provided by social media, However, the quality of information on social media is lower than in traditional news media there is a lot of hoax information spreading. With many disadvantages felt by hoax information, it has led to many research to detect hoax information on social media, especially information that is widely spread on Twitter. There are several previous researches that use various models using machine learning and also using deep learning to detect hoax. deep learning is very well used to perform several text classification tasks, especially in detecting hoax. The aim of this paper is to compare the LSTM and IndoBERT methods in detecting hoax using datasets taken from Twitter. In this study, two experiments work are conducted, LSTM and IndoBERT methods. The experimental results is average value obtained from experiments using 10-fold cross-validation. The IndoBERT model shows good performance with an average accuracy value of 92.07%, and the LSTM model provides an average accuracy value of 87.54%. The IndoBERT model can show good performance in hoax detection tasks and is shown to outperform the LSTM model which can provide the best average accuracy results in this study.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T07:23:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4cc9515aaa274012a376f9f8471e50b4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2580-0760
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T07:23:09Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Ikatan Ahli Informatika Indonesia
record_format Article
series Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi)
spelling doaj.art-4cc9515aaa274012a376f9f8471e50b42024-02-02T22:44:01ZengIkatan Ahli Informatika IndonesiaJurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi)2580-07602023-06-017365766210.29207/resti.v7i3.48304830Comparison of LSTM and IndoBERT Method in Identifying Hoax on TwitterMuhammad Ikram Kaer Sinapoy0Yuliant SibaroniSri Suryani PrasetyowatiTelkom UniversityIn recent years, social media users have been increasing significantly, in January 2022 social media users in Indonesia reached 191 million people which has an increase of 12.35% from the previous year as many as 170 million people, With this massive increase every year, more and more people tend to seek and consume information through social media. Despite the many advantages provided by social media, However, the quality of information on social media is lower than in traditional news media there is a lot of hoax information spreading. With many disadvantages felt by hoax information, it has led to many research to detect hoax information on social media, especially information that is widely spread on Twitter. There are several previous researches that use various models using machine learning and also using deep learning to detect hoax. deep learning is very well used to perform several text classification tasks, especially in detecting hoax. The aim of this paper is to compare the LSTM and IndoBERT methods in detecting hoax using datasets taken from Twitter. In this study, two experiments work are conducted, LSTM and IndoBERT methods. The experimental results is average value obtained from experiments using 10-fold cross-validation. The IndoBERT model shows good performance with an average accuracy value of 92.07%, and the LSTM model provides an average accuracy value of 87.54%. The IndoBERT model can show good performance in hoax detection tasks and is shown to outperform the LSTM model which can provide the best average accuracy results in this study.http://jurnal.iaii.or.id/index.php/RESTI/article/view/4830hoax detection, social media, lstm, indobert
spellingShingle Muhammad Ikram Kaer Sinapoy
Yuliant Sibaroni
Sri Suryani Prasetyowati
Comparison of LSTM and IndoBERT Method in Identifying Hoax on Twitter
Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi)
hoax detection, social media, lstm, indobert
title Comparison of LSTM and IndoBERT Method in Identifying Hoax on Twitter
title_full Comparison of LSTM and IndoBERT Method in Identifying Hoax on Twitter
title_fullStr Comparison of LSTM and IndoBERT Method in Identifying Hoax on Twitter
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of LSTM and IndoBERT Method in Identifying Hoax on Twitter
title_short Comparison of LSTM and IndoBERT Method in Identifying Hoax on Twitter
title_sort comparison of lstm and indobert method in identifying hoax on twitter
topic hoax detection, social media, lstm, indobert
url http://jurnal.iaii.or.id/index.php/RESTI/article/view/4830
work_keys_str_mv AT muhammadikramkaersinapoy comparisonoflstmandindobertmethodinidentifyinghoaxontwitter
AT yuliantsibaroni comparisonoflstmandindobertmethodinidentifyinghoaxontwitter
AT srisuryaniprasetyowati comparisonoflstmandindobertmethodinidentifyinghoaxontwitter