Peer-mentor support for older vulnerable myocardial infarction patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation: single-arm feasibility study

Abstract Background The positive effects of cardiac rehabilitation are well established. However, it has an inherent challenge, namely the low attendance rate among older vulnerable patients, which illustrates the need for effective interventions. Peer mentoring is a low-cost intervention that has t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria Pedersen, Birgitte Bennich, Takyiwa Boateng, Anne Marie Beck, Kirstine Sibilitz, Ingelise Andersen, Dorthe Overgaard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-08-01
Series:Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-022-01141-w
_version_ 1811215624783790080
author Maria Pedersen
Birgitte Bennich
Takyiwa Boateng
Anne Marie Beck
Kirstine Sibilitz
Ingelise Andersen
Dorthe Overgaard
author_facet Maria Pedersen
Birgitte Bennich
Takyiwa Boateng
Anne Marie Beck
Kirstine Sibilitz
Ingelise Andersen
Dorthe Overgaard
author_sort Maria Pedersen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The positive effects of cardiac rehabilitation are well established. However, it has an inherent challenge, namely the low attendance rate among older vulnerable patients, which illustrates the need for effective interventions. Peer mentoring is a low-cost intervention that has the potential to improve cardiac rehabilitation attendance and improve physical and psychological outcomes among older patients. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility and acceptability of a peer-mentor intervention among older vulnerable myocardial infarction patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation. Methods The study was conducted as a single-arm feasibility study and designed as a mixed methods intervention study. Patients admitted to a university hospital in Denmark between September 2020 and December 2020 received a 24-week peer-mentor intervention. The feasibility of the intervention was evaluated based on five criteria by Orsmond and Cohn: (a) recruitment capability, (b) data-collection procedures, (c) intervention acceptability, (d) available resources, and (e) participant responses to the intervention. Data were collected through self-administrated questionnaires, closed-ended telephone interviews, semi-structured interviews, and document sheets. Results Twenty patients were offered the peer-mentor intervention. The intervention proved feasible, with a low dropout rate and high acceptability. However, the original inclusion criteria only involved vulnerable women, and this proved not to be feasible, and were therefore revised to also include vulnerable male patients. Peer mentors (n = 17) were monitored during the intervention period, and the findings indicate that their mentoring role did not cause any harm. The peer-mentor intervention showed signs of effectiveness, as a high rate of cardiac rehabilitation attendance was achieved among patients. Quality of life also increased among patients. This was the case for emotional, physical, and global quality of life measures at 24-week follow-up. Conclusion The peer-mentor intervention is a feasible and acceptable intervention that holds the potential to increase both cardiac rehabilitation attendance and quality of life in older vulnerable patients. This finding paves the way for peer-mentor interventions to be tested in randomized controlled trials, with a view toward reducing inequality in cardiac rehabilitation attendance. However, some of the original study procedures were not feasible, and as such was revised. Trial registration The feasibility study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( ClinicalTrials.gov identification number: NCT04507529 ), August 11, 2020.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T06:25:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4cca67c50e2a428aa3844502ac0f644a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2055-5784
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T06:25:47Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Pilot and Feasibility Studies
spelling doaj.art-4cca67c50e2a428aa3844502ac0f644a2022-12-22T03:44:09ZengBMCPilot and Feasibility Studies2055-57842022-08-018112310.1186/s40814-022-01141-wPeer-mentor support for older vulnerable myocardial infarction patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation: single-arm feasibility studyMaria Pedersen0Birgitte Bennich1Takyiwa Boateng2Anne Marie Beck3Kirstine Sibilitz4Ingelise Andersen5Dorthe Overgaard6Department of Nursing and Nutrition, University College CopenhagenDepartment of Nursing and Nutrition, University College CopenhagenDepartment of Nursing and Nutrition, University College CopenhagenDepartment of Nursing and Nutrition, University College CopenhagenDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University HospitalSection of Social Medicine, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of CopenhagenDepartment of Nursing and Nutrition, University College CopenhagenAbstract Background The positive effects of cardiac rehabilitation are well established. However, it has an inherent challenge, namely the low attendance rate among older vulnerable patients, which illustrates the need for effective interventions. Peer mentoring is a low-cost intervention that has the potential to improve cardiac rehabilitation attendance and improve physical and psychological outcomes among older patients. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility and acceptability of a peer-mentor intervention among older vulnerable myocardial infarction patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation. Methods The study was conducted as a single-arm feasibility study and designed as a mixed methods intervention study. Patients admitted to a university hospital in Denmark between September 2020 and December 2020 received a 24-week peer-mentor intervention. The feasibility of the intervention was evaluated based on five criteria by Orsmond and Cohn: (a) recruitment capability, (b) data-collection procedures, (c) intervention acceptability, (d) available resources, and (e) participant responses to the intervention. Data were collected through self-administrated questionnaires, closed-ended telephone interviews, semi-structured interviews, and document sheets. Results Twenty patients were offered the peer-mentor intervention. The intervention proved feasible, with a low dropout rate and high acceptability. However, the original inclusion criteria only involved vulnerable women, and this proved not to be feasible, and were therefore revised to also include vulnerable male patients. Peer mentors (n = 17) were monitored during the intervention period, and the findings indicate that their mentoring role did not cause any harm. The peer-mentor intervention showed signs of effectiveness, as a high rate of cardiac rehabilitation attendance was achieved among patients. Quality of life also increased among patients. This was the case for emotional, physical, and global quality of life measures at 24-week follow-up. Conclusion The peer-mentor intervention is a feasible and acceptable intervention that holds the potential to increase both cardiac rehabilitation attendance and quality of life in older vulnerable patients. This finding paves the way for peer-mentor interventions to be tested in randomized controlled trials, with a view toward reducing inequality in cardiac rehabilitation attendance. However, some of the original study procedures were not feasible, and as such was revised. Trial registration The feasibility study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( ClinicalTrials.gov identification number: NCT04507529 ), August 11, 2020.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-022-01141-wMentorsPatient participationPatient perspectivesRehabilitationInequalities in healthCoronary heart disease
spellingShingle Maria Pedersen
Birgitte Bennich
Takyiwa Boateng
Anne Marie Beck
Kirstine Sibilitz
Ingelise Andersen
Dorthe Overgaard
Peer-mentor support for older vulnerable myocardial infarction patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation: single-arm feasibility study
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Mentors
Patient participation
Patient perspectives
Rehabilitation
Inequalities in health
Coronary heart disease
title Peer-mentor support for older vulnerable myocardial infarction patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation: single-arm feasibility study
title_full Peer-mentor support for older vulnerable myocardial infarction patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation: single-arm feasibility study
title_fullStr Peer-mentor support for older vulnerable myocardial infarction patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation: single-arm feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Peer-mentor support for older vulnerable myocardial infarction patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation: single-arm feasibility study
title_short Peer-mentor support for older vulnerable myocardial infarction patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation: single-arm feasibility study
title_sort peer mentor support for older vulnerable myocardial infarction patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation single arm feasibility study
topic Mentors
Patient participation
Patient perspectives
Rehabilitation
Inequalities in health
Coronary heart disease
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-022-01141-w
work_keys_str_mv AT mariapedersen peermentorsupportforoldervulnerablemyocardialinfarctionpatientsreferredtocardiacrehabilitationsinglearmfeasibilitystudy
AT birgittebennich peermentorsupportforoldervulnerablemyocardialinfarctionpatientsreferredtocardiacrehabilitationsinglearmfeasibilitystudy
AT takyiwaboateng peermentorsupportforoldervulnerablemyocardialinfarctionpatientsreferredtocardiacrehabilitationsinglearmfeasibilitystudy
AT annemariebeck peermentorsupportforoldervulnerablemyocardialinfarctionpatientsreferredtocardiacrehabilitationsinglearmfeasibilitystudy
AT kirstinesibilitz peermentorsupportforoldervulnerablemyocardialinfarctionpatientsreferredtocardiacrehabilitationsinglearmfeasibilitystudy
AT ingeliseandersen peermentorsupportforoldervulnerablemyocardialinfarctionpatientsreferredtocardiacrehabilitationsinglearmfeasibilitystudy
AT dortheovergaard peermentorsupportforoldervulnerablemyocardialinfarctionpatientsreferredtocardiacrehabilitationsinglearmfeasibilitystudy