Hernioplasty of large and giant diaphragmal hernias with polypropylene and biocarbonic implant

Aim. Highlighting the immediate and long-term results of using a biocarbon implant in comparison with the standard method of using a polypropylene implant when operating on patients with large and giant diaphragmatic hernias.Materials and methods. All patients were divided into 2 study groups, which...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: I. I. Rosenfeld
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Private institution educational organization of higher education "Medical University "ReaViz" 2021-08-01
Series:Вестник медицинского института «Реавиз»: Реабилитация, врач и здоровье
Subjects:
Online Access:https://vestnik.reaviz.ru/jour/article/view/266
_version_ 1797702897023057920
author I. I. Rosenfeld
author_facet I. I. Rosenfeld
author_sort I. I. Rosenfeld
collection DOAJ
description Aim. Highlighting the immediate and long-term results of using a biocarbon implant in comparison with the standard method of using a polypropylene implant when operating on patients with large and giant diaphragmatic hernias.Materials and methods. All patients were divided into 2 study groups, which underwent alloplasty with various implants: Group I of 221 patients who underwent alloplasty with a polypropylene mesh implant (171 patients with large hernias with an area of 10–20 cm2 and 50 patients with giant hiatal hernias with the area of the hernial defect is more than 20 cm2); Group II of 79 patients who underwent original alloplasty with a two-layer biocarbon mesh implant (50 patients with large hernias and 29 patients with giant hiatal hernias). Postoperative complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo scale. The De Meester Index was used as a comparison criterion.Results. The results of surgical treatment are pilot and representative, which determine the further tactics and direction of improving operations to remove large and giant diaphragmatic hernias. The data on the use of a two-layer biocarbon implant and a comparison with a polypropylene implant during onlay repair of large and giant diaphragmatic hernias are presented.Conclusion. There were significant differences in relapses of all types in favor of a biocarbon implant (5,6 versus 22,8%; p < 0,0001; Fisher's exact test).
first_indexed 2024-03-12T04:57:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4cd2e079f08a44f8842a37bdfadb12fe
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2226-762X
2782-1579
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-03-12T04:57:35Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher Private institution educational organization of higher education "Medical University "ReaViz"
record_format Article
series Вестник медицинского института «Реавиз»: Реабилитация, врач и здоровье
spelling doaj.art-4cd2e079f08a44f8842a37bdfadb12fe2023-09-03T09:14:44ZrusPrivate institution educational organization of higher education "Medical University "ReaViz"Вестник медицинского института «Реавиз»: Реабилитация, врач и здоровье2226-762X2782-15792021-08-0104798710.20340/vmi-rvz.2021.4.CLIN.3217Hernioplasty of large and giant diaphragmal hernias with polypropylene and biocarbonic implantI. I. Rosenfeld0Тверской государственный медицинский университетAim. Highlighting the immediate and long-term results of using a biocarbon implant in comparison with the standard method of using a polypropylene implant when operating on patients with large and giant diaphragmatic hernias.Materials and methods. All patients were divided into 2 study groups, which underwent alloplasty with various implants: Group I of 221 patients who underwent alloplasty with a polypropylene mesh implant (171 patients with large hernias with an area of 10–20 cm2 and 50 patients with giant hiatal hernias with the area of the hernial defect is more than 20 cm2); Group II of 79 patients who underwent original alloplasty with a two-layer biocarbon mesh implant (50 patients with large hernias and 29 patients with giant hiatal hernias). Postoperative complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo scale. The De Meester Index was used as a comparison criterion.Results. The results of surgical treatment are pilot and representative, which determine the further tactics and direction of improving operations to remove large and giant diaphragmatic hernias. The data on the use of a two-layer biocarbon implant and a comparison with a polypropylene implant during onlay repair of large and giant diaphragmatic hernias are presented.Conclusion. There were significant differences in relapses of all types in favor of a biocarbon implant (5,6 versus 22,8%; p < 0,0001; Fisher's exact test).https://vestnik.reaviz.ru/jour/article/view/266грыжи пищеводного отверстия диафрагмыгерниопластикаполипропиленовый имплантатбиокарбоновый имплантаттехника операции
spellingShingle I. I. Rosenfeld
Hernioplasty of large and giant diaphragmal hernias with polypropylene and biocarbonic implant
Вестник медицинского института «Реавиз»: Реабилитация, врач и здоровье
грыжи пищеводного отверстия диафрагмы
герниопластика
полипропиленовый имплантат
биокарбоновый имплантат
техника операции
title Hernioplasty of large and giant diaphragmal hernias with polypropylene and biocarbonic implant
title_full Hernioplasty of large and giant diaphragmal hernias with polypropylene and biocarbonic implant
title_fullStr Hernioplasty of large and giant diaphragmal hernias with polypropylene and biocarbonic implant
title_full_unstemmed Hernioplasty of large and giant diaphragmal hernias with polypropylene and biocarbonic implant
title_short Hernioplasty of large and giant diaphragmal hernias with polypropylene and biocarbonic implant
title_sort hernioplasty of large and giant diaphragmal hernias with polypropylene and biocarbonic implant
topic грыжи пищеводного отверстия диафрагмы
герниопластика
полипропиленовый имплантат
биокарбоновый имплантат
техника операции
url https://vestnik.reaviz.ru/jour/article/view/266
work_keys_str_mv AT iirosenfeld hernioplastyoflargeandgiantdiaphragmalherniaswithpolypropyleneandbiocarbonicimplant