Investigating the use of fillers by kurdish efl university students in relation to speaking fluency

The current study investigates the use of fillers produced by a sample of 80 Kurdish EFL university students (males and females), freshers and seniors, in relation to speaking fluency. The general methodological procedures of discourse analysis (hence, DA) by Potter and Wetherell (1987), Fairclough...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dilbreen Abdullah, Fakhir Mohammed
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: Universiy of Zakho 2023-09-01
Series:گۆڤارا زانستێن مرۆڤایەتی یا زانكۆیا زاخۆ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hjuoz.uoz.edu.krd/index.php/hum/article/view/1149
_version_ 1797662723565158400
author Dilbreen Abdullah
Fakhir Mohammed
author_facet Dilbreen Abdullah
Fakhir Mohammed
author_sort Dilbreen Abdullah
collection DOAJ
description The current study investigates the use of fillers produced by a sample of 80 Kurdish EFL university students (males and females), freshers and seniors, in relation to speaking fluency. The general methodological procedures of discourse analysis (hence, DA) by Potter and Wetherell (1987), Fairclough (1995) and Van Dijk (1997) have been followed to analyze the data extracted from the selected sample (i.e., spoken corpus). For finding the types of fillers, it was helpful to use Rose’s (1998) classification of fillers into unlexicalized fillers (UFs) and lexicalized fillers (LFs). Further, by using a speaking fluency rubric, the statistical correlation between fillers and speaking fluency was measured. The results showed that the lexicalized fillers (LFs) were used by the Kurdish EFL university students three times more than the unlexicalized fillers (UFs). Also, it was found that the most frequently used examples of UFs were Uh and Um, and the highest percentages of LFs were recorded for and, so, yeah and yes. With regard to speaking fluency levels, it was concluded that fillers are considered to be markers of mid or low levels of fluency. In other words, although fillers were also used in higher levels of fluency, however, the higher the level of fluency is, the lesser the use of fillers is.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T19:04:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4cd6a9303c93402c9c7da4c6649678d5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2664-4673
2664-4681
language Arabic
last_indexed 2024-03-11T19:04:17Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Universiy of Zakho
record_format Article
series گۆڤارا زانستێن مرۆڤایەتی یا زانكۆیا زاخۆ
spelling doaj.art-4cd6a9303c93402c9c7da4c6649678d52023-10-10T10:34:54ZaraUniversiy of Zakhoگۆڤارا زانستێن مرۆڤایەتی یا زانكۆیا زاخۆ2664-46732664-46812023-09-0111310.26436/hjuoz.2023.11.3.1149Investigating the use of fillers by kurdish efl university students in relation to speaking fluencyDilbreen Abdullah0Fakhir Mohammed1Faculty of Humanities, University of Zakho, Duhok, Kurdistan Region -Iraq.College of Languages, University of Duhok, Duhok, Kurdistan Region -Iraq. The current study investigates the use of fillers produced by a sample of 80 Kurdish EFL university students (males and females), freshers and seniors, in relation to speaking fluency. The general methodological procedures of discourse analysis (hence, DA) by Potter and Wetherell (1987), Fairclough (1995) and Van Dijk (1997) have been followed to analyze the data extracted from the selected sample (i.e., spoken corpus). For finding the types of fillers, it was helpful to use Rose’s (1998) classification of fillers into unlexicalized fillers (UFs) and lexicalized fillers (LFs). Further, by using a speaking fluency rubric, the statistical correlation between fillers and speaking fluency was measured. The results showed that the lexicalized fillers (LFs) were used by the Kurdish EFL university students three times more than the unlexicalized fillers (UFs). Also, it was found that the most frequently used examples of UFs were Uh and Um, and the highest percentages of LFs were recorded for and, so, yeah and yes. With regard to speaking fluency levels, it was concluded that fillers are considered to be markers of mid or low levels of fluency. In other words, although fillers were also used in higher levels of fluency, however, the higher the level of fluency is, the lesser the use of fillers is. https://hjuoz.uoz.edu.krd/index.php/hum/article/view/1149Fillers, Lexicalized, Unlexicalized, Efl Students, University, Speaking Fluency.
spellingShingle Dilbreen Abdullah
Fakhir Mohammed
Investigating the use of fillers by kurdish efl university students in relation to speaking fluency
گۆڤارا زانستێن مرۆڤایەتی یا زانكۆیا زاخۆ
Fillers, Lexicalized, Unlexicalized, Efl Students, University, Speaking Fluency.
title Investigating the use of fillers by kurdish efl university students in relation to speaking fluency
title_full Investigating the use of fillers by kurdish efl university students in relation to speaking fluency
title_fullStr Investigating the use of fillers by kurdish efl university students in relation to speaking fluency
title_full_unstemmed Investigating the use of fillers by kurdish efl university students in relation to speaking fluency
title_short Investigating the use of fillers by kurdish efl university students in relation to speaking fluency
title_sort investigating the use of fillers by kurdish efl university students in relation to speaking fluency
topic Fillers, Lexicalized, Unlexicalized, Efl Students, University, Speaking Fluency.
url https://hjuoz.uoz.edu.krd/index.php/hum/article/view/1149
work_keys_str_mv AT dilbreenabdullah investigatingtheuseoffillersbykurdishefluniversitystudentsinrelationtospeakingfluency
AT fakhirmohammed investigatingtheuseoffillersbykurdishefluniversitystudentsinrelationtospeakingfluency