The appropriate hybrid surgical strategy in three-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a finite element analysis

Abstract Objective The purpose of this FE study was to analyze the biomechanical characteristics of different HS strategies used in the treatment of three-level CDDD (one-level CDA and two-level ACDF). Methods We validated the FE model of an intact cervical spine established by transferring the data...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Y. M. Xie, Y. C. Zheng, S. J. Qiu, K. Q. Gong, Y. Duan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-12-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1502-5
_version_ 1811279350840950784
author Y. M. Xie
Y. C. Zheng
S. J. Qiu
K. Q. Gong
Y. Duan
author_facet Y. M. Xie
Y. C. Zheng
S. J. Qiu
K. Q. Gong
Y. Duan
author_sort Y. M. Xie
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective The purpose of this FE study was to analyze the biomechanical characteristics of different HS strategies used in the treatment of three-level CDDD (one-level CDA and two-level ACDF). Methods We validated the FE model of an intact cervical spine established by transferring the data, collected by 3D CT scan, to the FE software ABAQUS and comparing these data with the data from published studies. Then, the FE model of hybrid surgery was reconstructed to analyze the range of motion (ROM), facet joint force, and stress distribution on an ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) core. Results The current cervical FE model was able to measure the biomechanical changes in a follow-up hybrid surgery simulation. The total ROM of the cervical HS models was substantially decreased compared with the total ROM of the intact group, and the M2 (C3/4 ACDF, C4/5 CDA, and C5/6 ACDF) model had the closest total ROM to the intact group, but the facet joint force adjacent to the treatment levels showed very little difference among them. The stress distribution showed noticeable similarity: two flanks were observed in the center core, but the inlay of M2 was more vulnerable. Conclusions Through the comparison of ROM, the facet joint force after CDA, and the stress distribution of the prosthesis, we find that M2 model has a better theoretical outcome, especially in preserving the maximum total ROM.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T00:53:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4cdde3fbe74e41b78c1ebd1d9fc60471
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1749-799X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T00:53:05Z
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
spelling doaj.art-4cdde3fbe74e41b78c1ebd1d9fc604712022-12-22T03:09:49ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2019-12-0114111010.1186/s13018-019-1502-5The appropriate hybrid surgical strategy in three-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a finite element analysisY. M. Xie0Y. C. Zheng1S. J. Qiu2K. Q. Gong3Y. Duan4Department of Spine Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical UniversityDepartment of Spine Surgery, The Second People’s Hospital of ShenzhenDepartment of Spine Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical UniversityDepartment of Spine Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical UniversityDepartment of Spine Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical UniversityAbstract Objective The purpose of this FE study was to analyze the biomechanical characteristics of different HS strategies used in the treatment of three-level CDDD (one-level CDA and two-level ACDF). Methods We validated the FE model of an intact cervical spine established by transferring the data, collected by 3D CT scan, to the FE software ABAQUS and comparing these data with the data from published studies. Then, the FE model of hybrid surgery was reconstructed to analyze the range of motion (ROM), facet joint force, and stress distribution on an ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) core. Results The current cervical FE model was able to measure the biomechanical changes in a follow-up hybrid surgery simulation. The total ROM of the cervical HS models was substantially decreased compared with the total ROM of the intact group, and the M2 (C3/4 ACDF, C4/5 CDA, and C5/6 ACDF) model had the closest total ROM to the intact group, but the facet joint force adjacent to the treatment levels showed very little difference among them. The stress distribution showed noticeable similarity: two flanks were observed in the center core, but the inlay of M2 was more vulnerable. Conclusions Through the comparison of ROM, the facet joint force after CDA, and the stress distribution of the prosthesis, we find that M2 model has a better theoretical outcome, especially in preserving the maximum total ROM.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1502-5Three-level cervical degenerative disc diseaseHybrid surgeryFinite element
spellingShingle Y. M. Xie
Y. C. Zheng
S. J. Qiu
K. Q. Gong
Y. Duan
The appropriate hybrid surgical strategy in three-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a finite element analysis
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Three-level cervical degenerative disc disease
Hybrid surgery
Finite element
title The appropriate hybrid surgical strategy in three-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a finite element analysis
title_full The appropriate hybrid surgical strategy in three-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a finite element analysis
title_fullStr The appropriate hybrid surgical strategy in three-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a finite element analysis
title_full_unstemmed The appropriate hybrid surgical strategy in three-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a finite element analysis
title_short The appropriate hybrid surgical strategy in three-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a finite element analysis
title_sort appropriate hybrid surgical strategy in three level cervical degenerative disc disease a finite element analysis
topic Three-level cervical degenerative disc disease
Hybrid surgery
Finite element
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1502-5
work_keys_str_mv AT ymxie theappropriatehybridsurgicalstrategyinthreelevelcervicaldegenerativediscdiseaseafiniteelementanalysis
AT yczheng theappropriatehybridsurgicalstrategyinthreelevelcervicaldegenerativediscdiseaseafiniteelementanalysis
AT sjqiu theappropriatehybridsurgicalstrategyinthreelevelcervicaldegenerativediscdiseaseafiniteelementanalysis
AT kqgong theappropriatehybridsurgicalstrategyinthreelevelcervicaldegenerativediscdiseaseafiniteelementanalysis
AT yduan theappropriatehybridsurgicalstrategyinthreelevelcervicaldegenerativediscdiseaseafiniteelementanalysis
AT ymxie appropriatehybridsurgicalstrategyinthreelevelcervicaldegenerativediscdiseaseafiniteelementanalysis
AT yczheng appropriatehybridsurgicalstrategyinthreelevelcervicaldegenerativediscdiseaseafiniteelementanalysis
AT sjqiu appropriatehybridsurgicalstrategyinthreelevelcervicaldegenerativediscdiseaseafiniteelementanalysis
AT kqgong appropriatehybridsurgicalstrategyinthreelevelcervicaldegenerativediscdiseaseafiniteelementanalysis
AT yduan appropriatehybridsurgicalstrategyinthreelevelcervicaldegenerativediscdiseaseafiniteelementanalysis