Comparing methane emissions from different sheep-keeping systems in semiarid regions: A case study of Syria
Sheep husbandry represents a significant source of methane (CH4) in semiarid grassland regions such as Syria. However, the contribution of sheep to CH4 emissions in Syria is still unknown. This study was designed to quantify CH4 emissions and identify possible mitigation strategies for their reducti...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2014-06-01
|
| Series: | Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1658077X13000131 |
| _version_ | 1811253791742230528 |
|---|---|
| author | Omar Hijazi Werner Berg Samouil Moussa Christian Ammon Kristina von Bobrutzki Reiner Brunsch |
| author_facet | Omar Hijazi Werner Berg Samouil Moussa Christian Ammon Kristina von Bobrutzki Reiner Brunsch |
| author_sort | Omar Hijazi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Sheep husbandry represents a significant source of methane (CH4) in semiarid grassland regions such as Syria. However, the contribution of sheep to CH4 emissions in Syria is still unknown. This study was designed to quantify CH4 emissions and identify possible mitigation strategies for their reduction. Methodology developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was used to estimate CH4 emissions. A survey was conducted on 64 farms from different locations in Syria in 2009. Data were collected concerning sheep-keeping systems (SKSs), body mass, milk and wool yield, farm locations, feed rations, periods of grazing on the Steppe, the duration of pasturing on agricultural residuals and time periods when sheep were kept in stables. Using a linear statistical model, the influence of SKS, geographical region and sheep body mass on emitted CH4 were analysed. The results showed that the geographical region, SKS and sheep body mass had significant effects (P < 0.05) on CH4 emissions. According to the model, the mean values of estimated CH4 emissions from extensive, semi-intensive and intensive SKSs were 26 ± 0.9, 22.5 ± 1.3 and 13.5 ± 1.7 kg/sheep year, respectively. In comparing differences between the least square means of CH4 emissions, the extensive and semi-intensive SKSs produced 92% and 66% higher CH4 emissions compared to intensive SKS. The differences in CH4 emissions within the distinct SKSs were attributed to dietary composition. Extensive SKS used a less concentrated feeding regime (98 ± 17 day/year) than semi-intensive SKS (114 ± 47 day/year), and intensive SKS employed concentrated feeding year round. Furthermore, it was observed that sheep with the same body mass produced higher CH4 emissions in extensive SKS than in semi-intensive and intensive SKSs. Moreover, the semi-intensive SKS occupied more natural pastures than extensive SKS, which caused an overuse of the Steppe. Therefore, an effective mitigation strategy involves the use of more digestible feed, which would be accomplished by increasing the quantity of concentrated feed. Owing to unfavourable farming conditions, low-cost nonconventional feeds such as the residuals of wheat and cotton should be used to improve sheep management practices to reduce Steppe overgrazing in the extensive and semi-intensive SKSs of Syria and other semiarid areas. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T16:56:37Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-4cdf635f6ee1428f8ab7af4f6f2f9dbb |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1658-077X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T16:56:37Z |
| publishDate | 2014-06-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences |
| spelling | doaj.art-4cdf635f6ee1428f8ab7af4f6f2f9dbb2022-12-22T03:24:11ZengElsevierJournal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences1658-077X2014-06-0113213914710.1016/j.jssas.2013.01.008Comparing methane emissions from different sheep-keeping systems in semiarid regions: A case study of SyriaOmar Hijazi0Werner Berg1Samouil Moussa2Christian Ammon3Kristina von Bobrutzki4Reiner Brunsch5Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering in Potsdam-Bornim, Department of Engineering for Livestock Management, Max-Eyth-Allee 100, 14469 Potsdam, GermanyLeibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering in Potsdam-Bornim, Department of Engineering for Livestock Management, Max-Eyth-Allee 100, 14469 Potsdam, GermanyUniversity of Damascus, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Production, Damascus, SyriaLeibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering in Potsdam-Bornim, Department of Engineering for Livestock Management, Max-Eyth-Allee 100, 14469 Potsdam, GermanyLeibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering in Potsdam-Bornim, Department of Engineering for Livestock Management, Max-Eyth-Allee 100, 14469 Potsdam, GermanyLeibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering in Potsdam-Bornim, Scientific Director, Max-Eyth-Allee 100, 14469 Potsdam, GermanySheep husbandry represents a significant source of methane (CH4) in semiarid grassland regions such as Syria. However, the contribution of sheep to CH4 emissions in Syria is still unknown. This study was designed to quantify CH4 emissions and identify possible mitigation strategies for their reduction. Methodology developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was used to estimate CH4 emissions. A survey was conducted on 64 farms from different locations in Syria in 2009. Data were collected concerning sheep-keeping systems (SKSs), body mass, milk and wool yield, farm locations, feed rations, periods of grazing on the Steppe, the duration of pasturing on agricultural residuals and time periods when sheep were kept in stables. Using a linear statistical model, the influence of SKS, geographical region and sheep body mass on emitted CH4 were analysed. The results showed that the geographical region, SKS and sheep body mass had significant effects (P < 0.05) on CH4 emissions. According to the model, the mean values of estimated CH4 emissions from extensive, semi-intensive and intensive SKSs were 26 ± 0.9, 22.5 ± 1.3 and 13.5 ± 1.7 kg/sheep year, respectively. In comparing differences between the least square means of CH4 emissions, the extensive and semi-intensive SKSs produced 92% and 66% higher CH4 emissions compared to intensive SKS. The differences in CH4 emissions within the distinct SKSs were attributed to dietary composition. Extensive SKS used a less concentrated feeding regime (98 ± 17 day/year) than semi-intensive SKS (114 ± 47 day/year), and intensive SKS employed concentrated feeding year round. Furthermore, it was observed that sheep with the same body mass produced higher CH4 emissions in extensive SKS than in semi-intensive and intensive SKSs. Moreover, the semi-intensive SKS occupied more natural pastures than extensive SKS, which caused an overuse of the Steppe. Therefore, an effective mitigation strategy involves the use of more digestible feed, which would be accomplished by increasing the quantity of concentrated feed. Owing to unfavourable farming conditions, low-cost nonconventional feeds such as the residuals of wheat and cotton should be used to improve sheep management practices to reduce Steppe overgrazing in the extensive and semi-intensive SKSs of Syria and other semiarid areas.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1658077X13000131CH4 emissionsSheep-keeping systemsSemiarid regionsSyriaFeedstuff components |
| spellingShingle | Omar Hijazi Werner Berg Samouil Moussa Christian Ammon Kristina von Bobrutzki Reiner Brunsch Comparing methane emissions from different sheep-keeping systems in semiarid regions: A case study of Syria Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences CH4 emissions Sheep-keeping systems Semiarid regions Syria Feedstuff components |
| title | Comparing methane emissions from different sheep-keeping systems in semiarid regions: A case study of Syria |
| title_full | Comparing methane emissions from different sheep-keeping systems in semiarid regions: A case study of Syria |
| title_fullStr | Comparing methane emissions from different sheep-keeping systems in semiarid regions: A case study of Syria |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparing methane emissions from different sheep-keeping systems in semiarid regions: A case study of Syria |
| title_short | Comparing methane emissions from different sheep-keeping systems in semiarid regions: A case study of Syria |
| title_sort | comparing methane emissions from different sheep keeping systems in semiarid regions a case study of syria |
| topic | CH4 emissions Sheep-keeping systems Semiarid regions Syria Feedstuff components |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1658077X13000131 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT omarhijazi comparingmethaneemissionsfromdifferentsheepkeepingsystemsinsemiaridregionsacasestudyofsyria AT wernerberg comparingmethaneemissionsfromdifferentsheepkeepingsystemsinsemiaridregionsacasestudyofsyria AT samouilmoussa comparingmethaneemissionsfromdifferentsheepkeepingsystemsinsemiaridregionsacasestudyofsyria AT christianammon comparingmethaneemissionsfromdifferentsheepkeepingsystemsinsemiaridregionsacasestudyofsyria AT kristinavonbobrutzki comparingmethaneemissionsfromdifferentsheepkeepingsystemsinsemiaridregionsacasestudyofsyria AT reinerbrunsch comparingmethaneemissionsfromdifferentsheepkeepingsystemsinsemiaridregionsacasestudyofsyria |