Identity Complexity and Integration in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Heterosexual Adolescents and Emerging Adults: Implications for Clinical Practice

The study aimed at assessing whether differences exist in identity complexity and integration between 31 lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) and 33 heterosexual youths whose mean age was 21.47 (SD = 3.27). It constitutes a pilot study using a newly created questionnaire, called Identity Labels and Life...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Simona Picariello, Cristiano Scandurra, Seth J. Schwartz, Anna Lisa Amodeo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Messina 2019-08-01
Series:Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://cab.unime.it/journals/index.php/MJCP/article/view/2092
_version_ 1811224921742770176
author Simona Picariello
Cristiano Scandurra
Seth J. Schwartz
Anna Lisa Amodeo
author_facet Simona Picariello
Cristiano Scandurra
Seth J. Schwartz
Anna Lisa Amodeo
author_sort Simona Picariello
collection DOAJ
description The study aimed at assessing whether differences exist in identity complexity and integration between 31 lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) and 33 heterosexual youths whose mean age was 21.47 (SD = 3.27). It constitutes a pilot study using a newly created questionnaire, called Identity Labels and Life Contexts Questionnaire (ILLCQ), which assesses the interplay between identity dimensions and life contexts. The ILLCQ allows to assess identity integration on three levels: 1) the integration among the different domains of identity in their intersection with the various life contexts (assessed through salience and centrality); 2) the integration between an individual’s self-definition and the definition mirrored by others (perceived self-recognition); and 3) the integration between how she/he feels her/himself to be and the way she/he shows her/himself to others. Results suggest that identity salience is significantly variable across the life contexts for both LGB and heterosexual youths. The only significant difference found between groups was higher salience and centrality of the sexual orientation domain for LGB youths. This constitutes a sort of core identity for LGB participants, which seems to be missing in the heterosexual counterparts. LGB youths reported general lower identity recognition on the part of other people. Implications for clinical practice are discussed.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T08:58:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4ce4b829eca247a8954b7d136af059ed
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2282-1619
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T08:58:14Z
publishDate 2019-08-01
publisher University of Messina
record_format Article
series Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology
spelling doaj.art-4ce4b829eca247a8954b7d136af059ed2022-12-22T03:39:20ZengUniversity of MessinaMediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology2282-16192019-08-017210.6092/2282-1619/2019.7.20921772Identity Complexity and Integration in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Heterosexual Adolescents and Emerging Adults: Implications for Clinical PracticeSimona Picariello0Cristiano Scandurra1Seth J. Schwartz2Anna Lisa Amodeo3University of Naples Federico IIUniversity of Naples Federico II - Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences<p>University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida</p> <p> </p>University of Naples Federico IIThe study aimed at assessing whether differences exist in identity complexity and integration between 31 lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) and 33 heterosexual youths whose mean age was 21.47 (SD = 3.27). It constitutes a pilot study using a newly created questionnaire, called Identity Labels and Life Contexts Questionnaire (ILLCQ), which assesses the interplay between identity dimensions and life contexts. The ILLCQ allows to assess identity integration on three levels: 1) the integration among the different domains of identity in their intersection with the various life contexts (assessed through salience and centrality); 2) the integration between an individual’s self-definition and the definition mirrored by others (perceived self-recognition); and 3) the integration between how she/he feels her/himself to be and the way she/he shows her/himself to others. Results suggest that identity salience is significantly variable across the life contexts for both LGB and heterosexual youths. The only significant difference found between groups was higher salience and centrality of the sexual orientation domain for LGB youths. This constitutes a sort of core identity for LGB participants, which seems to be missing in the heterosexual counterparts. LGB youths reported general lower identity recognition on the part of other people. Implications for clinical practice are discussed.http://cab.unime.it/journals/index.php/MJCP/article/view/2092identity integrationlgb youthssexual orientationillcqidentity development
spellingShingle Simona Picariello
Cristiano Scandurra
Seth J. Schwartz
Anna Lisa Amodeo
Identity Complexity and Integration in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Heterosexual Adolescents and Emerging Adults: Implications for Clinical Practice
Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology
identity integration
lgb youths
sexual orientation
illcq
identity development
title Identity Complexity and Integration in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Heterosexual Adolescents and Emerging Adults: Implications for Clinical Practice
title_full Identity Complexity and Integration in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Heterosexual Adolescents and Emerging Adults: Implications for Clinical Practice
title_fullStr Identity Complexity and Integration in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Heterosexual Adolescents and Emerging Adults: Implications for Clinical Practice
title_full_unstemmed Identity Complexity and Integration in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Heterosexual Adolescents and Emerging Adults: Implications for Clinical Practice
title_short Identity Complexity and Integration in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Heterosexual Adolescents and Emerging Adults: Implications for Clinical Practice
title_sort identity complexity and integration in lesbian gay bisexual and heterosexual adolescents and emerging adults implications for clinical practice
topic identity integration
lgb youths
sexual orientation
illcq
identity development
url http://cab.unime.it/journals/index.php/MJCP/article/view/2092
work_keys_str_mv AT simonapicariello identitycomplexityandintegrationinlesbiangaybisexualandheterosexualadolescentsandemergingadultsimplicationsforclinicalpractice
AT cristianoscandurra identitycomplexityandintegrationinlesbiangaybisexualandheterosexualadolescentsandemergingadultsimplicationsforclinicalpractice
AT sethjschwartz identitycomplexityandintegrationinlesbiangaybisexualandheterosexualadolescentsandemergingadultsimplicationsforclinicalpractice
AT annalisaamodeo identitycomplexityandintegrationinlesbiangaybisexualandheterosexualadolescentsandemergingadultsimplicationsforclinicalpractice