Natural Frequencies Improve Bayesian Reasoning in Simple and Complex Inference Tasks

Representing statistical information in terms of natural frequencies rather than probabilities improves performance in Bayesian inference tasks. This beneficial effect of natural frequencies has been demonstrated in a variety of applied domains such as medicine, law, and education. Yet all the resea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ulrich eHoffrage, Stefan eKrauss, Laura Felicia Martignon, Gerd eGigerenzer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01473/full
_version_ 1811256201692839936
author Ulrich eHoffrage
Stefan eKrauss
Laura Felicia Martignon
Gerd eGigerenzer
author_facet Ulrich eHoffrage
Stefan eKrauss
Laura Felicia Martignon
Gerd eGigerenzer
author_sort Ulrich eHoffrage
collection DOAJ
description Representing statistical information in terms of natural frequencies rather than probabilities improves performance in Bayesian inference tasks. This beneficial effect of natural frequencies has been demonstrated in a variety of applied domains such as medicine, law, and education. Yet all the research and applications so far have been limited to situations where one dichotomous cue is used to infer which of two hypotheses is true. Real-life applications, however, often involve situations (e.g., medical tests) where cues have more than one value, where more than two hypotheses are considered, or where more than one cue is available. In Study 1, we show that natural frequencies, compared to information stated in terms of probabilities, consistently increase the proportion of Bayesian inferences made by medical students in four conditions—three cue values, three hypotheses, two cues, or three cues—by an average of 37 percentage points. In Study 2, we show that teaching natural frequencies for simple tasks with one dichotomous cue and two hypotheses leads to a transfer of learning to complex tasks with three cue values and two cues, with a proportion of 40% and 81% correct inferences, respectively. Thus, natural frequencies facilitate Bayesian reasoning in a much broader class of situations than previously thought.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T17:36:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4cf79ca6b95d412ca9d1b969fd546387
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T17:36:33Z
publishDate 2015-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-4cf79ca6b95d412ca9d1b969fd5463872022-12-22T03:22:56ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782015-10-01610.3389/fpsyg.2015.01473153266Natural Frequencies Improve Bayesian Reasoning in Simple and Complex Inference TasksUlrich eHoffrage0Stefan eKrauss1Laura Felicia Martignon2Gerd eGigerenzer3Faculty of Business and Economics (HEC Lausanne), University of LausanneUniversity of RegensburgPädagogische Hochschule LudwigsburgMax Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, GermanyRepresenting statistical information in terms of natural frequencies rather than probabilities improves performance in Bayesian inference tasks. This beneficial effect of natural frequencies has been demonstrated in a variety of applied domains such as medicine, law, and education. Yet all the research and applications so far have been limited to situations where one dichotomous cue is used to infer which of two hypotheses is true. Real-life applications, however, often involve situations (e.g., medical tests) where cues have more than one value, where more than two hypotheses are considered, or where more than one cue is available. In Study 1, we show that natural frequencies, compared to information stated in terms of probabilities, consistently increase the proportion of Bayesian inferences made by medical students in four conditions—three cue values, three hypotheses, two cues, or three cues—by an average of 37 percentage points. In Study 2, we show that teaching natural frequencies for simple tasks with one dichotomous cue and two hypotheses leads to a transfer of learning to complex tasks with three cue values and two cues, with a proportion of 40% and 81% correct inferences, respectively. Thus, natural frequencies facilitate Bayesian reasoning in a much broader class of situations than previously thought.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01473/fullvisualizationinstructionBayesian inferencetask complexitynatural frequenciesRepresentation of information
spellingShingle Ulrich eHoffrage
Stefan eKrauss
Laura Felicia Martignon
Gerd eGigerenzer
Natural Frequencies Improve Bayesian Reasoning in Simple and Complex Inference Tasks
Frontiers in Psychology
visualization
instruction
Bayesian inference
task complexity
natural frequencies
Representation of information
title Natural Frequencies Improve Bayesian Reasoning in Simple and Complex Inference Tasks
title_full Natural Frequencies Improve Bayesian Reasoning in Simple and Complex Inference Tasks
title_fullStr Natural Frequencies Improve Bayesian Reasoning in Simple and Complex Inference Tasks
title_full_unstemmed Natural Frequencies Improve Bayesian Reasoning in Simple and Complex Inference Tasks
title_short Natural Frequencies Improve Bayesian Reasoning in Simple and Complex Inference Tasks
title_sort natural frequencies improve bayesian reasoning in simple and complex inference tasks
topic visualization
instruction
Bayesian inference
task complexity
natural frequencies
Representation of information
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01473/full
work_keys_str_mv AT ulrichehoffrage naturalfrequenciesimprovebayesianreasoninginsimpleandcomplexinferencetasks
AT stefanekrauss naturalfrequenciesimprovebayesianreasoninginsimpleandcomplexinferencetasks
AT laurafeliciamartignon naturalfrequenciesimprovebayesianreasoninginsimpleandcomplexinferencetasks
AT gerdegigerenzer naturalfrequenciesimprovebayesianreasoninginsimpleandcomplexinferencetasks