The Theories of Humor in the Study of the Clown Figure

This article continues the research of the author in the field of studying the phenomenon of a clown. The author discusses the problem of polar interpretations of the figure of a clown in scientific discourse, where there is a noticeable absence of convincing art history and cultural theories and co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Semenova Elena A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: State Institute for Art Studies 2023-03-01
Series:Художественная культура
Subjects:
Online Access:https://artculturestudies.sias.ru/upload/iblock/5d1/hk_2023_1_50_S.pdf
_version_ 1797828590636630016
author Semenova Elena A.
author_facet Semenova Elena A.
author_sort Semenova Elena A.
collection DOAJ
description This article continues the research of the author in the field of studying the phenomenon of a clown. The author discusses the problem of polar interpretations of the figure of a clown in scientific discourse, where there is a noticeable absence of convincing art history and cultural theories and concepts that can explain the connection between the figure of a clown and the phenomenon of laughter and humour. It is noted that, despite the fact that most studies focus on clown laughter, they do not analyse its specifics. In connection with the problem posed, the author suggests shifting away from the established paradigm of considering a clown as an artistic image and a comic character, and puts forward a hypothesis, according to which evolutionary theories of laughter and humour hold considerable verification potential for studying the clown figure. The author concludes that based on A.G. Kozintsev’s interdisciplinary evolutionary theory of laughter and the theory of humour, it is possible to prove the relationship between the clown phenomenon and the nature of laughter. The article discusses the assumption that man is the only species capable of semiosis and humorous meta-reflection, due to which he can be considered the most superficial hominid or “a flat animal” (the concept of G. Deleuze) that has humour, which is equivalent to a clown. The results of this research can be applied when studying the peculiarities of a clown as an artistic image (representation) in a work of art.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T13:07:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4cf93a2240824cac9ba31f003c3306ce
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2226-0072
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T13:07:53Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher State Institute for Art Studies
record_format Article
series Художественная культура
spelling doaj.art-4cf93a2240824cac9ba31f003c3306ce2023-05-12T12:45:12ZengState Institute for Art StudiesХудожественная культура2226-00722023-03-01306710.51678/2226-0072-2023-1-30-67The Theories of Humor in the Study of the Clown FigureSemenova Elena A.0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1316-3162NP “Theatre-EX”This article continues the research of the author in the field of studying the phenomenon of a clown. The author discusses the problem of polar interpretations of the figure of a clown in scientific discourse, where there is a noticeable absence of convincing art history and cultural theories and concepts that can explain the connection between the figure of a clown and the phenomenon of laughter and humour. It is noted that, despite the fact that most studies focus on clown laughter, they do not analyse its specifics. In connection with the problem posed, the author suggests shifting away from the established paradigm of considering a clown as an artistic image and a comic character, and puts forward a hypothesis, according to which evolutionary theories of laughter and humour hold considerable verification potential for studying the clown figure. The author concludes that based on A.G. Kozintsev’s interdisciplinary evolutionary theory of laughter and the theory of humour, it is possible to prove the relationship between the clown phenomenon and the nature of laughter. The article discusses the assumption that man is the only species capable of semiosis and humorous meta-reflection, due to which he can be considered the most superficial hominid or “a flat animal” (the concept of G. Deleuze) that has humour, which is equivalent to a clown. The results of this research can be applied when studying the peculiarities of a clown as an artistic image (representation) in a work of art.https://artculturestudies.sias.ru/upload/iblock/5d1/hk_2023_1_50_S.pdfclownevolutionary theory of humourа.g. kozintsevlaughterartistic imagehumorous selfdenialart
spellingShingle Semenova Elena A.
The Theories of Humor in the Study of the Clown Figure
Художественная культура
clown
evolutionary theory of humour
а.g. kozintsev
laughter
artistic image
humorous selfdenial
art
title The Theories of Humor in the Study of the Clown Figure
title_full The Theories of Humor in the Study of the Clown Figure
title_fullStr The Theories of Humor in the Study of the Clown Figure
title_full_unstemmed The Theories of Humor in the Study of the Clown Figure
title_short The Theories of Humor in the Study of the Clown Figure
title_sort theories of humor in the study of the clown figure
topic clown
evolutionary theory of humour
а.g. kozintsev
laughter
artistic image
humorous selfdenial
art
url https://artculturestudies.sias.ru/upload/iblock/5d1/hk_2023_1_50_S.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT semenovaelenaa thetheoriesofhumorinthestudyoftheclownfigure
AT semenovaelenaa theoriesofhumorinthestudyoftheclownfigure