Against the Equal Weight View in the Epistemology of Disagreement
In this paper I propose an argument against the conciliatory view in peer disagreement. One of the most important grounds for conciliatory views is the assumption that the epistemic situation in peer disagreement between two peers is symmetri cal. Symmetry justifies the conciliatory views. If so, sh...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
2018-12-01
|
Series: | حکمت و فلسفه |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_9787_b5b8c305c86be83120c5c630d9905957.pdf |
_version_ | 1827580793311985664 |
---|---|
author | امید کریم زاده |
author_facet | امید کریم زاده |
author_sort | امید کریم زاده |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In this paper I propose an argument against the conciliatory view in peer disagreement. One of the most important grounds for conciliatory views is the assumption that the epistemic situation in peer disagreement between two peers is symmetri cal. Symmetry justifies the conciliatory views. If so, showing that the situation is actually asymmetric should count as a refutation to conciliatory views of disagreement. By appealing to the difference between the processes by which the beliefs of the two parties have been formed, I try to show that there is a difference between the reliabilities of the two beliefs. This means the asymmetrical situation between two peers in disagreement. Since the conciliatory and steadfast views are contradictory views, any argument against one of them should be considered as an argument for the other. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T22:25:12Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-4d004449de8e4ae2a8b870f1df5bca9b |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1735-3238 2476-6038 |
language | fas |
last_indexed | 2024-03-08T22:25:12Z |
publishDate | 2018-12-01 |
publisher | Allameh Tabataba'i University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | حکمت و فلسفه |
spelling | doaj.art-4d004449de8e4ae2a8b870f1df5bca9b2023-12-18T10:46:18ZfasAllameh Tabataba'i University Pressحکمت و فلسفه1735-32382476-60382018-12-011456435910.22054/wph.2019.27680.14819787Against the Equal Weight View in the Epistemology of Disagreementامید کریم زاده0عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه شهید بهشتیIn this paper I propose an argument against the conciliatory view in peer disagreement. One of the most important grounds for conciliatory views is the assumption that the epistemic situation in peer disagreement between two peers is symmetri cal. Symmetry justifies the conciliatory views. If so, showing that the situation is actually asymmetric should count as a refutation to conciliatory views of disagreement. By appealing to the difference between the processes by which the beliefs of the two parties have been formed, I try to show that there is a difference between the reliabilities of the two beliefs. This means the asymmetrical situation between two peers in disagreement. Since the conciliatory and steadfast views are contradictory views, any argument against one of them should be considered as an argument for the other.https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_9787_b5b8c305c86be83120c5c630d9905957.pdfconciliatory viewdisagreementintuitionvisionasymmetrynormative judgement. |
spellingShingle | امید کریم زاده Against the Equal Weight View in the Epistemology of Disagreement حکمت و فلسفه conciliatory view disagreement intuition vision asymmetry normative judgement. |
title | Against the Equal Weight View in the Epistemology of Disagreement |
title_full | Against the Equal Weight View in the Epistemology of Disagreement |
title_fullStr | Against the Equal Weight View in the Epistemology of Disagreement |
title_full_unstemmed | Against the Equal Weight View in the Epistemology of Disagreement |
title_short | Against the Equal Weight View in the Epistemology of Disagreement |
title_sort | against the equal weight view in the epistemology of disagreement |
topic | conciliatory view disagreement intuition vision asymmetry normative judgement. |
url | https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_9787_b5b8c305c86be83120c5c630d9905957.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ạmydḵrymzạdh againsttheequalweightviewintheepistemologyofdisagreement |