Seismic Performance of Steel Structure-Foundation Systems Designed According to Eurocode 8 Provisions: The Case of Near-Fault Seismic Motions
The seismic performance of steel structure-foundation systems subjected to near-fault earthquakes was assessed on the basis of response results from nonlinear time-history seismic analyses. The structural results included the maximum values for residual interstory drift ratios, base shears, and over...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-03-01
|
Series: | Buildings |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/10/4/63 |
_version_ | 1819011072246415360 |
---|---|
author | Panagiota Katsimpini Foteini Konstandakopoulou George Papagiannopoulos Nikos Pnevmatikos George Hatzigeorgiou |
author_facet | Panagiota Katsimpini Foteini Konstandakopoulou George Papagiannopoulos Nikos Pnevmatikos George Hatzigeorgiou |
author_sort | Panagiota Katsimpini |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The seismic performance of steel structure-foundation systems subjected to near-fault earthquakes was assessed on the basis of response results from nonlinear time-history seismic analyses. The structural results included the maximum values for residual interstory drift ratios, base shears, and overturning moments of the steel structures, as well as the maximum values for residual settlement and tilting of the foundations. In order to reveal the influence of soil-building-interaction on the aforementioned response results, the steel building-foundation systems were designed according to Eurocode 8 provisions, assuming initially fixed and then compliant base conditions. It was concluded that for the case of near-fault seismic motions, good seismic performance of steel building-foundation hybrid systems designed according to European Codes was not guaranteed. A particular thing to note for these systems under near-fault seismic motions was that the seismic performance of the steel structure was most likely unacceptable, while one of the foundations was always acceptable. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-21T01:22:20Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-4d0b5351e4da4a1ebf62c16dbc21f6a0 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2075-5309 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-21T01:22:20Z |
publishDate | 2020-03-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Buildings |
spelling | doaj.art-4d0b5351e4da4a1ebf62c16dbc21f6a02022-12-21T19:20:37ZengMDPI AGBuildings2075-53092020-03-011046310.3390/buildings10040063buildings10040063Seismic Performance of Steel Structure-Foundation Systems Designed According to Eurocode 8 Provisions: The Case of Near-Fault Seismic MotionsPanagiota Katsimpini0Foteini Konstandakopoulou1George Papagiannopoulos2Nikos Pnevmatikos3George Hatzigeorgiou4University of Patras, Department of Civil Engineering, GR-26500, Patras, GreeceHellenic Open University, School of Science and Technology, GR-26335, Patras, GreeceHellenic Open University, School of Science and Technology, GR-26335, Patras, GreeceUniversity of West Attica, Department of Civil Engineering, GR-12241 Athens, GreeceHellenic Open University, School of Science and Technology, GR-26335, Patras, GreeceThe seismic performance of steel structure-foundation systems subjected to near-fault earthquakes was assessed on the basis of response results from nonlinear time-history seismic analyses. The structural results included the maximum values for residual interstory drift ratios, base shears, and overturning moments of the steel structures, as well as the maximum values for residual settlement and tilting of the foundations. In order to reveal the influence of soil-building-interaction on the aforementioned response results, the steel building-foundation systems were designed according to Eurocode 8 provisions, assuming initially fixed and then compliant base conditions. It was concluded that for the case of near-fault seismic motions, good seismic performance of steel building-foundation hybrid systems designed according to European Codes was not guaranteed. A particular thing to note for these systems under near-fault seismic motions was that the seismic performance of the steel structure was most likely unacceptable, while one of the foundations was always acceptable.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/10/4/63seismic performancesteel structuresfoundationsoil-structure interactionnear-fault seismic motionsstructural safetyeuropean codes |
spellingShingle | Panagiota Katsimpini Foteini Konstandakopoulou George Papagiannopoulos Nikos Pnevmatikos George Hatzigeorgiou Seismic Performance of Steel Structure-Foundation Systems Designed According to Eurocode 8 Provisions: The Case of Near-Fault Seismic Motions Buildings seismic performance steel structures foundation soil-structure interaction near-fault seismic motions structural safety european codes |
title | Seismic Performance of Steel Structure-Foundation Systems Designed According to Eurocode 8 Provisions: The Case of Near-Fault Seismic Motions |
title_full | Seismic Performance of Steel Structure-Foundation Systems Designed According to Eurocode 8 Provisions: The Case of Near-Fault Seismic Motions |
title_fullStr | Seismic Performance of Steel Structure-Foundation Systems Designed According to Eurocode 8 Provisions: The Case of Near-Fault Seismic Motions |
title_full_unstemmed | Seismic Performance of Steel Structure-Foundation Systems Designed According to Eurocode 8 Provisions: The Case of Near-Fault Seismic Motions |
title_short | Seismic Performance of Steel Structure-Foundation Systems Designed According to Eurocode 8 Provisions: The Case of Near-Fault Seismic Motions |
title_sort | seismic performance of steel structure foundation systems designed according to eurocode 8 provisions the case of near fault seismic motions |
topic | seismic performance steel structures foundation soil-structure interaction near-fault seismic motions structural safety european codes |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/10/4/63 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT panagiotakatsimpini seismicperformanceofsteelstructurefoundationsystemsdesignedaccordingtoeurocode8provisionsthecaseofnearfaultseismicmotions AT foteinikonstandakopoulou seismicperformanceofsteelstructurefoundationsystemsdesignedaccordingtoeurocode8provisionsthecaseofnearfaultseismicmotions AT georgepapagiannopoulos seismicperformanceofsteelstructurefoundationsystemsdesignedaccordingtoeurocode8provisionsthecaseofnearfaultseismicmotions AT nikospnevmatikos seismicperformanceofsteelstructurefoundationsystemsdesignedaccordingtoeurocode8provisionsthecaseofnearfaultseismicmotions AT georgehatzigeorgiou seismicperformanceofsteelstructurefoundationsystemsdesignedaccordingtoeurocode8provisionsthecaseofnearfaultseismicmotions |