Validation and Functional Relevance of the Short Form of the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire for Depression for Japanese Patients with Major Depressive Disorder [Corrigendum]

Validation and Functional Relevance of the Short Form of the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire for Depression for Japanese Patients with Major Depressive Disorder [Corrigendum]

Sumiyoshi T, Uchida H, Watanabe K, et al. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2022;18:2507–2517. The authors have advised there are errors in the text and Table 1 on page 2512 of the published paper. Table 1 Pearson Correlation Coefficients Between WPAI Subscale Scores and PDQ-D-5 Total Scores Val...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sumiyoshi T, Uchida H, Watanabe K, Oosawa M, Ren H, Moriguchi Y, Fujikawa K, Fernandez J
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2024-03-01
Series:Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
Subjects:
pdq-d-20
pdq-d-5
cognition
functional impairment
major depressive disorder
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/corrigendum-validation-and-functional-relevance-of-the-short-form-of-t-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-NDT
Description
Summary:Sumiyoshi T, Uchida H, Watanabe K, et al. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2022;18:2507–2517. The authors have advised there are errors in the text and Table 1 on page 2512 of the published paper. Table 1 Pearson Correlation Coefficients Between WPAI Subscale Scores and PDQ-D-5 Total Scores Validity of the PDQ-D-5 by Comparison with Other Measures section, fourth sentence, the text “PDQ-D-5 scores showed a moderate correlation with the presenteeism (rmcorr, 0.56, p < 0.0001), overall work impairment (rmcorr, 0.58, p < 0.0001), and impairment of general activity (rmcorr, 0.63, p < 0.0001) subscale scores on WPAI, while the correlation with absenteeism scores was weak (rmcorr, 0.21, p < 0.004) (Table 1)” should read “PDQ-D-5 scores showed a moderate correlation with the presenteeism (rmcorr, 0.51, p < 0.0001), overall work impairment (rmcorr, 0.51, p < 0.0001), and impairment of general activity (rmcorr, 0.54, p < 0.0001) subscale scores on WPAI, while the correlation with absenteeism scores was weak (rmcorr, −0.04, p = 0.31) (Table 1)”. The correct Table 1 is as follows. The authors confirm that they do not believe that the modifications detailed above affect the interpretation of the results and consider them to be numerical in nature only. The authors apologize for these errors.
ISSN:1178-2021

Similar Items