Two years after pulmonary vein isolation guided by ablation index—a multicenter study

Abstract Background The use of the Ablation Index (AI) software for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) has been associated with higher acute effectiveness and higher 1‐year arrhythmia freedom. There is, however, a lack of data concerning longer follow‐up. We aim to evaluate the 2‐year outcomes afte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pedro A. Sousa, Luís Puga, Luís Adão, João Primo, Ziad Khoueiry, Ana Lebreiro, Paulo Fonseca, Philippe Lagrange, Luís Elvas, Lino Gonçalves
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-06-01
Series:Journal of Arrhythmia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12696
_version_ 1818216744841379840
author Pedro A. Sousa
Luís Puga
Luís Adão
João Primo
Ziad Khoueiry
Ana Lebreiro
Paulo Fonseca
Philippe Lagrange
Luís Elvas
Lino Gonçalves
author_facet Pedro A. Sousa
Luís Puga
Luís Adão
João Primo
Ziad Khoueiry
Ana Lebreiro
Paulo Fonseca
Philippe Lagrange
Luís Elvas
Lino Gonçalves
author_sort Pedro A. Sousa
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The use of the Ablation Index (AI) software for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) has been associated with higher acute effectiveness and higher 1‐year arrhythmia freedom. There is, however, a lack of data concerning longer follow‐up. We aim to evaluate the 2‐year outcomes after a standardized AI‐guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Methods Prospective, multicenter study of consecutive patients referred for paroxysmal AF ablation from January 2018 to July 2019. PVI was guided by a tailored AI value (≥500 for anterior segment, ≥450 for the roof segments and inferior segments, and 400 for the posterior wall) and an ILD ≤6 mm. The primary endpoints were acute and long‐term effectiveness. Results The study included 218 (842 PV) patients (61% males, median age of 60 [IQR 49–68] years) with paroxysmal AF. First‐pass isolation was obtained in 93% of the patients, with an acute reconnection occurring in 10.6% of the patients (3.2% of the PV) following adenosine trial. After a median follow‐up of 26 (IQR 20–30) months, freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia was 83.4%, off‐AAD. The rate of adverse events was 1.4%. Although procedural parameters differ across centers (p < 0.001), the acute (p = 0.56) and long‐term effectiveness (p = 0.83) were consistent between centers. Conclusions Patients with paroxysmal AF submitted to an AI‐guided PVI workflow presented high arrhythmia freedom at 2‐years of follow‐up.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T06:56:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4d0f9fbbd4be4986aeaaa98006f26e97
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1880-4276
1883-2148
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T06:56:51Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Arrhythmia
spelling doaj.art-4d0f9fbbd4be4986aeaaa98006f26e972022-12-22T00:33:56ZengWileyJournal of Arrhythmia1880-42761883-21482022-06-0138334635210.1002/joa3.12696Two years after pulmonary vein isolation guided by ablation index—a multicenter studyPedro A. Sousa0Luís Puga1Luís Adão2João Primo3Ziad Khoueiry4Ana Lebreiro5Paulo Fonseca6Philippe Lagrange7Luís Elvas8Lino Gonçalves9Pacing & Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiology Department Coimbra's Hospital and University Center Coimbra PortugalPacing & Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiology Department Coimbra's Hospital and University Center Coimbra PortugalCardiology Department University Hospital Center of São João Porto PortugalCardiology Department Vila Nova de Gaia & Espinho Hospital Center PortugalCardiology Department Clinique Saint Pierre Perpignan FranceCardiology Department University Hospital Center of São João Porto PortugalCardiology Department Vila Nova de Gaia & Espinho Hospital Center PortugalCardiology Department Clinique Saint Pierre Perpignan FrancePacing & Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiology Department Coimbra's Hospital and University Center Coimbra PortugalPacing & Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiology Department Coimbra's Hospital and University Center Coimbra PortugalAbstract Background The use of the Ablation Index (AI) software for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) has been associated with higher acute effectiveness and higher 1‐year arrhythmia freedom. There is, however, a lack of data concerning longer follow‐up. We aim to evaluate the 2‐year outcomes after a standardized AI‐guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Methods Prospective, multicenter study of consecutive patients referred for paroxysmal AF ablation from January 2018 to July 2019. PVI was guided by a tailored AI value (≥500 for anterior segment, ≥450 for the roof segments and inferior segments, and 400 for the posterior wall) and an ILD ≤6 mm. The primary endpoints were acute and long‐term effectiveness. Results The study included 218 (842 PV) patients (61% males, median age of 60 [IQR 49–68] years) with paroxysmal AF. First‐pass isolation was obtained in 93% of the patients, with an acute reconnection occurring in 10.6% of the patients (3.2% of the PV) following adenosine trial. After a median follow‐up of 26 (IQR 20–30) months, freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia was 83.4%, off‐AAD. The rate of adverse events was 1.4%. Although procedural parameters differ across centers (p < 0.001), the acute (p = 0.56) and long‐term effectiveness (p = 0.83) were consistent between centers. Conclusions Patients with paroxysmal AF submitted to an AI‐guided PVI workflow presented high arrhythmia freedom at 2‐years of follow‐up.https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12696ablation indexpulmonary vein isolationstandardized workflowtailored ablationtwo years follow‐up
spellingShingle Pedro A. Sousa
Luís Puga
Luís Adão
João Primo
Ziad Khoueiry
Ana Lebreiro
Paulo Fonseca
Philippe Lagrange
Luís Elvas
Lino Gonçalves
Two years after pulmonary vein isolation guided by ablation index—a multicenter study
Journal of Arrhythmia
ablation index
pulmonary vein isolation
standardized workflow
tailored ablation
two years follow‐up
title Two years after pulmonary vein isolation guided by ablation index—a multicenter study
title_full Two years after pulmonary vein isolation guided by ablation index—a multicenter study
title_fullStr Two years after pulmonary vein isolation guided by ablation index—a multicenter study
title_full_unstemmed Two years after pulmonary vein isolation guided by ablation index—a multicenter study
title_short Two years after pulmonary vein isolation guided by ablation index—a multicenter study
title_sort two years after pulmonary vein isolation guided by ablation index a multicenter study
topic ablation index
pulmonary vein isolation
standardized workflow
tailored ablation
two years follow‐up
url https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12696
work_keys_str_mv AT pedroasousa twoyearsafterpulmonaryveinisolationguidedbyablationindexamulticenterstudy
AT luispuga twoyearsafterpulmonaryveinisolationguidedbyablationindexamulticenterstudy
AT luisadao twoyearsafterpulmonaryveinisolationguidedbyablationindexamulticenterstudy
AT joaoprimo twoyearsafterpulmonaryveinisolationguidedbyablationindexamulticenterstudy
AT ziadkhoueiry twoyearsafterpulmonaryveinisolationguidedbyablationindexamulticenterstudy
AT analebreiro twoyearsafterpulmonaryveinisolationguidedbyablationindexamulticenterstudy
AT paulofonseca twoyearsafterpulmonaryveinisolationguidedbyablationindexamulticenterstudy
AT philippelagrange twoyearsafterpulmonaryveinisolationguidedbyablationindexamulticenterstudy
AT luiselvas twoyearsafterpulmonaryveinisolationguidedbyablationindexamulticenterstudy
AT linogoncalves twoyearsafterpulmonaryveinisolationguidedbyablationindexamulticenterstudy