Development of the prototype concise safe systems checklist tool for general practice

Abstract Background In the course of producing a patient safety toolkit for primary care, we identified the need for a concise safe-systems checklist designed to address areas of patient safety which are under-represented in mandatory requirements and existing tools. This paper describes the develop...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ian Litchfield, Rachel Spencer, Brian G. Bell, Anthony Avery, Katherine Perryman, Kate Marsden, Sheila Greenfield, Stephen Campbell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-06-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-020-05396-y
_version_ 1818520858647330816
author Ian Litchfield
Rachel Spencer
Brian G. Bell
Anthony Avery
Katherine Perryman
Kate Marsden
Sheila Greenfield
Stephen Campbell
author_facet Ian Litchfield
Rachel Spencer
Brian G. Bell
Anthony Avery
Katherine Perryman
Kate Marsden
Sheila Greenfield
Stephen Campbell
author_sort Ian Litchfield
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background In the course of producing a patient safety toolkit for primary care, we identified the need for a concise safe-systems checklist designed to address areas of patient safety which are under-represented in mandatory requirements and existing tools. This paper describes the development of a prototype checklist designed to be used in busy general practice environments to provide an overview of key patient safety related processes and prompt practice wide-discussion. Methods An extensive narrative review and a survey of world-wide general practice organisations were used to identify existing primary care patient safety issues and tools. A RAND panel of international experts rated the results, summarising the findings for importance and relevance. The checklist was created to include areas that are not part of established patient safety tools or mandatory and legal requirements. Four main themes were identified: information flow, practice safety information, prescribing, and use of IT systems from which a 13 item checklist was trialled in 16 practices resulting in a nine item prototype checklist, which was tested in eight practices. Qualitative data on the utility and usability of the prototype was collected through a series of semi-structured interviews. Results In testing the prototype four of nine items on the checklist were achieved by all eight practices. Three items were achieved by seven of eight practices and two items by six of eight practices. Participants welcomed the brevity and ease of use of the prototype, that it might be used within time scales at their discretion and its ability to engage a range of practice staff in relevant discussions on the safety of existing processes. The items relating to prescribing safety were considered particularly useful. Conclusions As a result of this work the concise patient safety checklist tool, specifically designed for general practice, has now been made available as part of an online Patient Safety Toolkit hosted by the Royal College of General Practitioners. Senior practice staff such as practice managers and GP partners should find it a useful tool to understand the safety of less explored yet important safety processes within the practice.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T01:43:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4d1560d7e3f14ff7ac52e3c4157fde2b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T01:43:16Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj.art-4d1560d7e3f14ff7ac52e3c4157fde2b2022-12-22T01:24:58ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632020-06-0120111210.1186/s12913-020-05396-yDevelopment of the prototype concise safe systems checklist tool for general practiceIan Litchfield0Rachel Spencer1Brian G. Bell2Anthony Avery3Katherine Perryman4Kate Marsden5Sheila Greenfield6Stephen Campbell7Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of BirminghamUnit of academic primary care, Warwick Medical School, University of WarwickDivision of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of NottinghamDivision of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of NottinghamDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, hester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, School for Health Sciences, University of ManchesterDivision of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of NottinghamInstitute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of BirminghamDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, hester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, School for Health Sciences, University of ManchesterAbstract Background In the course of producing a patient safety toolkit for primary care, we identified the need for a concise safe-systems checklist designed to address areas of patient safety which are under-represented in mandatory requirements and existing tools. This paper describes the development of a prototype checklist designed to be used in busy general practice environments to provide an overview of key patient safety related processes and prompt practice wide-discussion. Methods An extensive narrative review and a survey of world-wide general practice organisations were used to identify existing primary care patient safety issues and tools. A RAND panel of international experts rated the results, summarising the findings for importance and relevance. The checklist was created to include areas that are not part of established patient safety tools or mandatory and legal requirements. Four main themes were identified: information flow, practice safety information, prescribing, and use of IT systems from which a 13 item checklist was trialled in 16 practices resulting in a nine item prototype checklist, which was tested in eight practices. Qualitative data on the utility and usability of the prototype was collected through a series of semi-structured interviews. Results In testing the prototype four of nine items on the checklist were achieved by all eight practices. Three items were achieved by seven of eight practices and two items by six of eight practices. Participants welcomed the brevity and ease of use of the prototype, that it might be used within time scales at their discretion and its ability to engage a range of practice staff in relevant discussions on the safety of existing processes. The items relating to prescribing safety were considered particularly useful. Conclusions As a result of this work the concise patient safety checklist tool, specifically designed for general practice, has now been made available as part of an online Patient Safety Toolkit hosted by the Royal College of General Practitioners. Senior practice staff such as practice managers and GP partners should find it a useful tool to understand the safety of less explored yet important safety processes within the practice.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-020-05396-yPatient safetyChecklistGeneral practiceQuality indicators healthcare
spellingShingle Ian Litchfield
Rachel Spencer
Brian G. Bell
Anthony Avery
Katherine Perryman
Kate Marsden
Sheila Greenfield
Stephen Campbell
Development of the prototype concise safe systems checklist tool for general practice
BMC Health Services Research
Patient safety
Checklist
General practice
Quality indicators healthcare
title Development of the prototype concise safe systems checklist tool for general practice
title_full Development of the prototype concise safe systems checklist tool for general practice
title_fullStr Development of the prototype concise safe systems checklist tool for general practice
title_full_unstemmed Development of the prototype concise safe systems checklist tool for general practice
title_short Development of the prototype concise safe systems checklist tool for general practice
title_sort development of the prototype concise safe systems checklist tool for general practice
topic Patient safety
Checklist
General practice
Quality indicators healthcare
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-020-05396-y
work_keys_str_mv AT ianlitchfield developmentoftheprototypeconcisesafesystemschecklisttoolforgeneralpractice
AT rachelspencer developmentoftheprototypeconcisesafesystemschecklisttoolforgeneralpractice
AT briangbell developmentoftheprototypeconcisesafesystemschecklisttoolforgeneralpractice
AT anthonyavery developmentoftheprototypeconcisesafesystemschecklisttoolforgeneralpractice
AT katherineperryman developmentoftheprototypeconcisesafesystemschecklisttoolforgeneralpractice
AT katemarsden developmentoftheprototypeconcisesafesystemschecklisttoolforgeneralpractice
AT sheilagreenfield developmentoftheprototypeconcisesafesystemschecklisttoolforgeneralpractice
AT stephencampbell developmentoftheprototypeconcisesafesystemschecklisttoolforgeneralpractice