Cost-effectiveness analysis of OM-85 vs placebo in the prevention of acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) in children that attend day-care centers

Abstract Background Children that attend day-care centers frequently contract acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs). ARTIs represent a burden for both children and parents. Systematic reviews on the use of immunostimulants for the prevention of juvenile recurrent ARTIs have provided moderate ev...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arturo Berber, Blanca Estela Del-Rio-Navarro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-05-01
Series:Health Economics Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13561-019-0230-1
_version_ 1818127063872176128
author Arturo Berber
Blanca Estela Del-Rio-Navarro
author_facet Arturo Berber
Blanca Estela Del-Rio-Navarro
author_sort Arturo Berber
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Children that attend day-care centers frequently contract acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs). ARTIs represent a burden for both children and parents. Systematic reviews on the use of immunostimulants for the prevention of juvenile recurrent ARTIs have provided moderate evidence of efficacy and safety. The aim of the study was to establish whether the immunostimulant, OM-85, was cost-effective in preventing ARTIs in children 2–6 years old that attended day-care centers or preschools in Mexico. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy of OM-85. For costs, we assumed an institutional perspective, which included the costs of care and supplies over a study period of six months, during the autumn-winter seasons. We created decision trees and constructed a model to identify pharmacoeconomic parameters. We generated 1000 estimations with the bootstrap method to calculate descriptive statistics of pharmacoeconomic parameters. We evaluated cost-effectiveness compared to treatment without immunostimulants. Results The mean (SD) incidences of ARTIs were 5.59 ± 0.29 without immunostimulants and 2.97 ± 0.32 with OM-85, during the study period. The mean (25th, 75th percentile) direct costs of ARTIs were 57.04 (37.11, 76.39) US$ (US dollars) without immunostimulants and 48.53 (37.35, 58.93) US$ with OM-85, with a mean increment of − 8.51(− 17.08, 0.75) US$, and a mean cost-effectiveness of − 17.94 (− 36.48, 1.66) US$. The direct costs plus the cost of one parent missing work to care for the child with ARTI were 125.76 (102.83, 150.16) US$, without immunostimulant and 85.21 (72.15, 98.81) US$, with OM-85. The increment was − 40.55 (− 68.29, − 13.95) US$, and the cost-effectiveness was − 86.89 (− 142.37, − 29.34) US$.Part of the cost reduction was ascribed to the reduced use of medications, particularly antibiotics. Conclusions Our results were consistent with previous clinical studies conducted in closed institutions in Mexico. OM-85 reduced the number of ARTIs and the frequency of antibiotics use. We concluded that OM-85 was cost-effective for preventing ARTIs in children that attended day-care centers, particularly when parental absenteeism was covered by the institutions.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T07:11:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4d19cfa888474b5b83acb7aed6a7b571
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2191-1991
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T07:11:24Z
publishDate 2019-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Health Economics Review
spelling doaj.art-4d19cfa888474b5b83acb7aed6a7b5712022-12-22T01:16:20ZengBMCHealth Economics Review2191-19912019-05-01911910.1186/s13561-019-0230-1Cost-effectiveness analysis of OM-85 vs placebo in the prevention of acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) in children that attend day-care centersArturo Berber0Blanca Estela Del-Rio-Navarro1Fundación para el Avance de la CienciaAllergy & Immunology Service, Hospital Infantil de Mexico “Federico Gomez”Abstract Background Children that attend day-care centers frequently contract acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs). ARTIs represent a burden for both children and parents. Systematic reviews on the use of immunostimulants for the prevention of juvenile recurrent ARTIs have provided moderate evidence of efficacy and safety. The aim of the study was to establish whether the immunostimulant, OM-85, was cost-effective in preventing ARTIs in children 2–6 years old that attended day-care centers or preschools in Mexico. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy of OM-85. For costs, we assumed an institutional perspective, which included the costs of care and supplies over a study period of six months, during the autumn-winter seasons. We created decision trees and constructed a model to identify pharmacoeconomic parameters. We generated 1000 estimations with the bootstrap method to calculate descriptive statistics of pharmacoeconomic parameters. We evaluated cost-effectiveness compared to treatment without immunostimulants. Results The mean (SD) incidences of ARTIs were 5.59 ± 0.29 without immunostimulants and 2.97 ± 0.32 with OM-85, during the study period. The mean (25th, 75th percentile) direct costs of ARTIs were 57.04 (37.11, 76.39) US$ (US dollars) without immunostimulants and 48.53 (37.35, 58.93) US$ with OM-85, with a mean increment of − 8.51(− 17.08, 0.75) US$, and a mean cost-effectiveness of − 17.94 (− 36.48, 1.66) US$. The direct costs plus the cost of one parent missing work to care for the child with ARTI were 125.76 (102.83, 150.16) US$, without immunostimulant and 85.21 (72.15, 98.81) US$, with OM-85. The increment was − 40.55 (− 68.29, − 13.95) US$, and the cost-effectiveness was − 86.89 (− 142.37, − 29.34) US$.Part of the cost reduction was ascribed to the reduced use of medications, particularly antibiotics. Conclusions Our results were consistent with previous clinical studies conducted in closed institutions in Mexico. OM-85 reduced the number of ARTIs and the frequency of antibiotics use. We concluded that OM-85 was cost-effective for preventing ARTIs in children that attended day-care centers, particularly when parental absenteeism was covered by the institutions.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13561-019-0230-1Acute respiratory tract infectionPreventionDay-care-centerImmunostimulantOM-85
spellingShingle Arturo Berber
Blanca Estela Del-Rio-Navarro
Cost-effectiveness analysis of OM-85 vs placebo in the prevention of acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) in children that attend day-care centers
Health Economics Review
Acute respiratory tract infection
Prevention
Day-care-center
Immunostimulant
OM-85
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of OM-85 vs placebo in the prevention of acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) in children that attend day-care centers
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of OM-85 vs placebo in the prevention of acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) in children that attend day-care centers
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of OM-85 vs placebo in the prevention of acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) in children that attend day-care centers
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of OM-85 vs placebo in the prevention of acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) in children that attend day-care centers
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of OM-85 vs placebo in the prevention of acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) in children that attend day-care centers
title_sort cost effectiveness analysis of om 85 vs placebo in the prevention of acute respiratory tract infections artis in children that attend day care centers
topic Acute respiratory tract infection
Prevention
Day-care-center
Immunostimulant
OM-85
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13561-019-0230-1
work_keys_str_mv AT arturoberber costeffectivenessanalysisofom85vsplacebointhepreventionofacuterespiratorytractinfectionsartisinchildrenthatattenddaycarecenters
AT blancaesteladelrionavarro costeffectivenessanalysisofom85vsplacebointhepreventionofacuterespiratorytractinfectionsartisinchildrenthatattenddaycarecenters