Impact of moving target on measurement accuracy in 3D and 4D PET imaging—a phantom study

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of tumor motion on maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) measurements in both 3-dimensional and respiratory-correlated, 4-dimensional positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. We also evaluated the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yunfeng Cui, PhD, James Bowsher, PhD, Jing Cai, PhD, Fang-Fang Yin, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-01-01
Series:Advances in Radiation Oncology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109416300677
_version_ 1818943124995571712
author Yunfeng Cui, PhD
James Bowsher, PhD
Jing Cai, PhD
Fang-Fang Yin, PhD
author_facet Yunfeng Cui, PhD
James Bowsher, PhD
Jing Cai, PhD
Fang-Fang Yin, PhD
author_sort Yunfeng Cui, PhD
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of tumor motion on maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) measurements in both 3-dimensional and respiratory-correlated, 4-dimensional positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. We also evaluated the effect of implementing different attenuation correction methods in 4-dimensional PET image reconstruction on SUVmax and MTV. Methods and materials: An anthropomorphic thorax phantom with a spherical ball as a surrogate for a tumor was used. Different types of motion were imposed on the ball to mimic a patient's breathing motion. Three-dimensional PET imaging of the phantom without tumor motion was performed and used as the reference. The ball was then set in motion with different breathing motion traces and imaged with both 3- and 4-dimensional PET methods. The clinical 4-dimensional PET imaging protocol was modified so that 3 different types of attenuation correction images were used for reconstructions: the same free-breathing computed tomography (CT) for all PET phases, the same average intensity projection CT for all PET phases, and 4-dimensional CT for phase-matched attenuation correction. Tumor SUVmax and MTV values that were measured from the moving phantom were compared with the reference values. Results: SUVmax that was measured in 3-dimensional PET imaging was different from the reference value by 20.4% on average for the motions that were investigated; this difference decreased to 2.6% with 4-dimensional PET imaging. The measurement of MTV in 4-dimensional PET also showed a similar magnitude of reduction of deviation compared with 3-dimensional PET. Four-dimensional PET with use of phase-matched 4-dimensional CT for attenuation correction showed less variation in SUVmax and MTV among phases compared with 4-dimensional PET with free-breathing CT or average intensity projection CT for attenuation correction. Conclusions: Four-dimensional PET imaging reduces the impact of motion on measured SUVmax and MTV when compared with 3-dimensional PET imaging. Clinical 4-dimensional PET imaging protocols should consider phase-matched 4-dimensional CT imaging for attenuation correction to achieve more accurate measurements.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T07:22:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4d20e24e96114e069d0c3e302ab4ac8a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2452-1094
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T07:22:21Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Advances in Radiation Oncology
spelling doaj.art-4d20e24e96114e069d0c3e302ab4ac8a2022-12-21T19:48:38ZengElsevierAdvances in Radiation Oncology2452-10942017-01-01219410010.1016/j.adro.2016.12.002Impact of moving target on measurement accuracy in 3D and 4D PET imaging—a phantom studyYunfeng Cui, PhDJames Bowsher, PhDJing Cai, PhDFang-Fang Yin, PhDPurpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of tumor motion on maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) measurements in both 3-dimensional and respiratory-correlated, 4-dimensional positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. We also evaluated the effect of implementing different attenuation correction methods in 4-dimensional PET image reconstruction on SUVmax and MTV. Methods and materials: An anthropomorphic thorax phantom with a spherical ball as a surrogate for a tumor was used. Different types of motion were imposed on the ball to mimic a patient's breathing motion. Three-dimensional PET imaging of the phantom without tumor motion was performed and used as the reference. The ball was then set in motion with different breathing motion traces and imaged with both 3- and 4-dimensional PET methods. The clinical 4-dimensional PET imaging protocol was modified so that 3 different types of attenuation correction images were used for reconstructions: the same free-breathing computed tomography (CT) for all PET phases, the same average intensity projection CT for all PET phases, and 4-dimensional CT for phase-matched attenuation correction. Tumor SUVmax and MTV values that were measured from the moving phantom were compared with the reference values. Results: SUVmax that was measured in 3-dimensional PET imaging was different from the reference value by 20.4% on average for the motions that were investigated; this difference decreased to 2.6% with 4-dimensional PET imaging. The measurement of MTV in 4-dimensional PET also showed a similar magnitude of reduction of deviation compared with 3-dimensional PET. Four-dimensional PET with use of phase-matched 4-dimensional CT for attenuation correction showed less variation in SUVmax and MTV among phases compared with 4-dimensional PET with free-breathing CT or average intensity projection CT for attenuation correction. Conclusions: Four-dimensional PET imaging reduces the impact of motion on measured SUVmax and MTV when compared with 3-dimensional PET imaging. Clinical 4-dimensional PET imaging protocols should consider phase-matched 4-dimensional CT imaging for attenuation correction to achieve more accurate measurements.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109416300677
spellingShingle Yunfeng Cui, PhD
James Bowsher, PhD
Jing Cai, PhD
Fang-Fang Yin, PhD
Impact of moving target on measurement accuracy in 3D and 4D PET imaging—a phantom study
Advances in Radiation Oncology
title Impact of moving target on measurement accuracy in 3D and 4D PET imaging—a phantom study
title_full Impact of moving target on measurement accuracy in 3D and 4D PET imaging—a phantom study
title_fullStr Impact of moving target on measurement accuracy in 3D and 4D PET imaging—a phantom study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of moving target on measurement accuracy in 3D and 4D PET imaging—a phantom study
title_short Impact of moving target on measurement accuracy in 3D and 4D PET imaging—a phantom study
title_sort impact of moving target on measurement accuracy in 3d and 4d pet imaging a phantom study
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109416300677
work_keys_str_mv AT yunfengcuiphd impactofmovingtargetonmeasurementaccuracyin3dand4dpetimagingaphantomstudy
AT jamesbowsherphd impactofmovingtargetonmeasurementaccuracyin3dand4dpetimagingaphantomstudy
AT jingcaiphd impactofmovingtargetonmeasurementaccuracyin3dand4dpetimagingaphantomstudy
AT fangfangyinphd impactofmovingtargetonmeasurementaccuracyin3dand4dpetimagingaphantomstudy