Qb technology – evaluating its use in adhd diagnosis within a child and adolescent mental health service

Introduction Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopment disorder characteristically compromising of three persistent symptoms; Inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity. Within the Tameside and Glossop CCG continuous performance tests from the company QbTech are used to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D. Manning, S. Olety
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2021-04-01
Series:European Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0924933821006003/type/journal_article
_version_ 1797617410391408640
author D. Manning
S. Olety
author_facet D. Manning
S. Olety
author_sort D. Manning
collection DOAJ
description Introduction Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopment disorder characteristically compromising of three persistent symptoms; Inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity. Within the Tameside and Glossop CCG continuous performance tests from the company QbTech are used to aid diagnosis. Objectives The aim of this research is to evaluate the effectiveness of using both the QbCheck (triage tool) and QbTest (diagnostic tool) concordantly in the diagnostic pathway of ADHD in young people. Methods 20 Patients who had undergone both performance tests were identified and then five components evaluated in the QbCheck were then compared to the QbTest results. Results In the five areas identified by both the QbTest and QbCheck up to 80% had the same outcomes in the two tests. However, in one area (hyperactivity) only 60% of QbChecks outcomes were replicated by the QbTest. The symptom of inattention most commonly correlated between the two tests. The average wait between tests was 9.8 months. 100% of those who scored on QB Check, received diagnosis of ADHD, suggesting high referrer specificity. Conclusions QbCheck diagnostic outcomes are comparable to patients who have undergone both the QbCheck and QbTest, only having one of these continuous performance tests making up the ADHD diagnostic pathway could be cost and time saving in the pathway to diagnosis. As QbCheck can be completed within the child’s school this reduces the number of clinic appointments that need to be attended by patients and their families.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T07:55:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4d3bddde10654f28a8d35a8257ed31d9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0924-9338
1778-3585
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T07:55:34Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series European Psychiatry
spelling doaj.art-4d3bddde10654f28a8d35a8257ed31d92023-11-17T05:05:45ZengCambridge University PressEuropean Psychiatry0924-93381778-35852021-04-0164S225S22510.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.600Qb technology – evaluating its use in adhd diagnosis within a child and adolescent mental health serviceD. Manning0S. Olety1Heathy Young Minds, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Stalybridge, United KingdomHeathy Young Minds, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Stalybridge, United Kingdom Introduction Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopment disorder characteristically compromising of three persistent symptoms; Inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity. Within the Tameside and Glossop CCG continuous performance tests from the company QbTech are used to aid diagnosis. Objectives The aim of this research is to evaluate the effectiveness of using both the QbCheck (triage tool) and QbTest (diagnostic tool) concordantly in the diagnostic pathway of ADHD in young people. Methods 20 Patients who had undergone both performance tests were identified and then five components evaluated in the QbCheck were then compared to the QbTest results. Results In the five areas identified by both the QbTest and QbCheck up to 80% had the same outcomes in the two tests. However, in one area (hyperactivity) only 60% of QbChecks outcomes were replicated by the QbTest. The symptom of inattention most commonly correlated between the two tests. The average wait between tests was 9.8 months. 100% of those who scored on QB Check, received diagnosis of ADHD, suggesting high referrer specificity. Conclusions QbCheck diagnostic outcomes are comparable to patients who have undergone both the QbCheck and QbTest, only having one of these continuous performance tests making up the ADHD diagnostic pathway could be cost and time saving in the pathway to diagnosis. As QbCheck can be completed within the child’s school this reduces the number of clinic appointments that need to be attended by patients and their families. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0924933821006003/type/journal_articleADHDCAMHSQB Technologyschool
spellingShingle D. Manning
S. Olety
Qb technology – evaluating its use in adhd diagnosis within a child and adolescent mental health service
European Psychiatry
ADHD
CAMHS
QB Technology
school
title Qb technology – evaluating its use in adhd diagnosis within a child and adolescent mental health service
title_full Qb technology – evaluating its use in adhd diagnosis within a child and adolescent mental health service
title_fullStr Qb technology – evaluating its use in adhd diagnosis within a child and adolescent mental health service
title_full_unstemmed Qb technology – evaluating its use in adhd diagnosis within a child and adolescent mental health service
title_short Qb technology – evaluating its use in adhd diagnosis within a child and adolescent mental health service
title_sort qb technology evaluating its use in adhd diagnosis within a child and adolescent mental health service
topic ADHD
CAMHS
QB Technology
school
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0924933821006003/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT dmanning qbtechnologyevaluatingitsuseinadhddiagnosiswithinachildandadolescentmentalhealthservice
AT solety qbtechnologyevaluatingitsuseinadhddiagnosiswithinachildandadolescentmentalhealthservice