Complications of preventive loop ileostomy versus colostomy: a meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis, and systematic review

Abstract Background Preventive colostomy is required for colorectal surgery, and the incidence of complications associated with ileostomy and colostomy remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the incidence of postoperative complications between ileostomy and colostomy procedures. Methods...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zheng Ge, Xiang Zhao, Zitian Liu, Guangwei Yang, Qunzheng Wu, Xiaoyang Wang, Xiang Zhang, Zhiqiang Cheng, Kexin Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-08-01
Series:BMC Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02129-w
_version_ 1827635764011204608
author Zheng Ge
Xiang Zhao
Zitian Liu
Guangwei Yang
Qunzheng Wu
Xiaoyang Wang
Xiang Zhang
Zhiqiang Cheng
Kexin Wang
author_facet Zheng Ge
Xiang Zhao
Zitian Liu
Guangwei Yang
Qunzheng Wu
Xiaoyang Wang
Xiang Zhang
Zhiqiang Cheng
Kexin Wang
author_sort Zheng Ge
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Preventive colostomy is required for colorectal surgery, and the incidence of complications associated with ileostomy and colostomy remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the incidence of postoperative complications between ileostomy and colostomy procedures. Methods Data analysis was conducted on 30 studies, and meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) were performed on five studies. The basic indicators, such as stoma prolapse, leak, wound infection, ileus, and a series of other indicators, were compared. Results No statistically significant differences were observed with complications other than stoma prolapse. Meta-analysis and TSA showed that the incidence of ileostomy prolapse was lower than that of colostomy prolapse, and the difference was statistically significant. Apart from the four complications listed above, the general data analysis showed differences in incidence between the two groups. The incidence of skin irritation, parastomal hernia, dehydration, pneumonia, and urinary tract infections was higher with ileostomy than with colostomy. In contrast, the incidence of parastomal fistula, stenosis, hemorrhage, and enterocutaneous fistula was higher with colostomy than with ileostomy. Conclusions There were differences in the incidence of ileostomy and colostomy complications in the selected studies, with a low incidence of ileostomy prolapse. PROSPERO registration number CRD42022303133.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T15:32:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4d3d370ff6c244e0a0eb24abec9c1f77
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2482
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T15:32:02Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Surgery
spelling doaj.art-4d3d370ff6c244e0a0eb24abec9c1f772023-11-26T12:11:39ZengBMCBMC Surgery1471-24822023-08-0123111110.1186/s12893-023-02129-wComplications of preventive loop ileostomy versus colostomy: a meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis, and systematic reviewZheng Ge0Xiang Zhao1Zitian Liu2Guangwei Yang3Qunzheng Wu4Xiaoyang Wang5Xiang Zhang6Zhiqiang Cheng7Kexin Wang8Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong UniversityCheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong UniversityCheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong UniversityCheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong UniversityDepartment of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong UniversityDepartment of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong UniversityDepartment of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong UniversityDepartment of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong UniversityDepartment of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong UniversityAbstract Background Preventive colostomy is required for colorectal surgery, and the incidence of complications associated with ileostomy and colostomy remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the incidence of postoperative complications between ileostomy and colostomy procedures. Methods Data analysis was conducted on 30 studies, and meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) were performed on five studies. The basic indicators, such as stoma prolapse, leak, wound infection, ileus, and a series of other indicators, were compared. Results No statistically significant differences were observed with complications other than stoma prolapse. Meta-analysis and TSA showed that the incidence of ileostomy prolapse was lower than that of colostomy prolapse, and the difference was statistically significant. Apart from the four complications listed above, the general data analysis showed differences in incidence between the two groups. The incidence of skin irritation, parastomal hernia, dehydration, pneumonia, and urinary tract infections was higher with ileostomy than with colostomy. In contrast, the incidence of parastomal fistula, stenosis, hemorrhage, and enterocutaneous fistula was higher with colostomy than with ileostomy. Conclusions There were differences in the incidence of ileostomy and colostomy complications in the selected studies, with a low incidence of ileostomy prolapse. PROSPERO registration number CRD42022303133.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02129-wPreventive loop ileostomyPreventive loop colostomyProlapseComplication
spellingShingle Zheng Ge
Xiang Zhao
Zitian Liu
Guangwei Yang
Qunzheng Wu
Xiaoyang Wang
Xiang Zhang
Zhiqiang Cheng
Kexin Wang
Complications of preventive loop ileostomy versus colostomy: a meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis, and systematic review
BMC Surgery
Preventive loop ileostomy
Preventive loop colostomy
Prolapse
Complication
title Complications of preventive loop ileostomy versus colostomy: a meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis, and systematic review
title_full Complications of preventive loop ileostomy versus colostomy: a meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis, and systematic review
title_fullStr Complications of preventive loop ileostomy versus colostomy: a meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis, and systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Complications of preventive loop ileostomy versus colostomy: a meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis, and systematic review
title_short Complications of preventive loop ileostomy versus colostomy: a meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis, and systematic review
title_sort complications of preventive loop ileostomy versus colostomy a meta analysis trial sequential analysis and systematic review
topic Preventive loop ileostomy
Preventive loop colostomy
Prolapse
Complication
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02129-w
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengge complicationsofpreventiveloopileostomyversuscolostomyametaanalysistrialsequentialanalysisandsystematicreview
AT xiangzhao complicationsofpreventiveloopileostomyversuscolostomyametaanalysistrialsequentialanalysisandsystematicreview
AT zitianliu complicationsofpreventiveloopileostomyversuscolostomyametaanalysistrialsequentialanalysisandsystematicreview
AT guangweiyang complicationsofpreventiveloopileostomyversuscolostomyametaanalysistrialsequentialanalysisandsystematicreview
AT qunzhengwu complicationsofpreventiveloopileostomyversuscolostomyametaanalysistrialsequentialanalysisandsystematicreview
AT xiaoyangwang complicationsofpreventiveloopileostomyversuscolostomyametaanalysistrialsequentialanalysisandsystematicreview
AT xiangzhang complicationsofpreventiveloopileostomyversuscolostomyametaanalysistrialsequentialanalysisandsystematicreview
AT zhiqiangcheng complicationsofpreventiveloopileostomyversuscolostomyametaanalysistrialsequentialanalysisandsystematicreview
AT kexinwang complicationsofpreventiveloopileostomyversuscolostomyametaanalysistrialsequentialanalysisandsystematicreview