Graft-to-recipient weight ratio exerts nonlinear effects on prognosis by interacting with donor liver macrosteatosis

AimTo investigate the interactions between the graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GWRWR) and other risk factors responsible for inferior allograft outcomes.MethodsA total of 362 patients who received liver transplantation (LT) were enrolled. Indicators such as graft/recipient weight and other prognost...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhengtao Liu, Jingting Lyu, Xiang Li, Lu Yu, Shuping Que, Jun Xu, Lei Geng, Shusen Zheng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1075845/full
_version_ 1797951372625182720
author Zhengtao Liu
Zhengtao Liu
Zhengtao Liu
Zhengtao Liu
Jingting Lyu
Xiang Li
Xiang Li
Lu Yu
Lu Yu
Shuping Que
Jun Xu
Jun Xu
Lei Geng
Lei Geng
Shusen Zheng
Shusen Zheng
Shusen Zheng
Shusen Zheng
Shusen Zheng
author_facet Zhengtao Liu
Zhengtao Liu
Zhengtao Liu
Zhengtao Liu
Jingting Lyu
Xiang Li
Xiang Li
Lu Yu
Lu Yu
Shuping Que
Jun Xu
Jun Xu
Lei Geng
Lei Geng
Shusen Zheng
Shusen Zheng
Shusen Zheng
Shusen Zheng
Shusen Zheng
author_sort Zhengtao Liu
collection DOAJ
description AimTo investigate the interactions between the graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GWRWR) and other risk factors responsible for inferior allograft outcomes.MethodsA total of 362 patients who received liver transplantation (LT) were enrolled. Indicators such as graft/recipient weight and other prognostic factors were collected. Comparisons of indicators and survival analysis were performed in groups categorized by the GWRWR. Interactions of large-for-size grafts (LFSGs) with graft macrosteatosis (MaS) were evaluated in terms of relative excess risk caused by interaction (RERI) and attributable proportion (AP). Cytoscape visualized the role of LFSGs in the risk profile for poor prognosis.ResultsBased on the GWRWR, LT cases can be categorized into three subgroups, standard (1%–2.5%), optimal (2.5%–3.0%), and inferior prognosis (>3.0%). Survival analysis confirmed clear separations in cases categorized by the above-defined limits on the GWRWR (P < 0.05). LFSGs caused inferior prognosis by initiating positive interactions with MaS severity.ConclusionThe GWRWR exerted nonlinear effects on prognosis in deceased donor LT cases. LFSGs (GWRWR > 3.0%) caused inferior outcomes, while grafts sized within (2.5%–3.0%) had optimal post-transplant prognosis. MaS increased the risk of poor prognosis by exerting positive synergistic effects on LFSGs.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T22:30:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4d5c5a923bd947229e25484075fa03d4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-875X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T22:30:38Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Surgery
spelling doaj.art-4d5c5a923bd947229e25484075fa03d42023-01-17T05:53:15ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Surgery2296-875X2023-01-01910.3389/fsurg.2022.10758451075845Graft-to-recipient weight ratio exerts nonlinear effects on prognosis by interacting with donor liver macrosteatosisZhengtao Liu0Zhengtao Liu1Zhengtao Liu2Zhengtao Liu3Jingting Lyu4Xiang Li5Xiang Li6Lu Yu7Lu Yu8Shuping Que9Jun Xu10Jun Xu11Lei Geng12Lei Geng13Shusen Zheng14Shusen Zheng15Shusen Zheng16Shusen Zheng17Shusen Zheng18Shulan International Medical College, Zhejiang Shuren University, Hangzhou, ChinaNHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, CAMS, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, ChinaKey Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, ChinaShulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Hangzhou, ChinaShulan International Medical College, Zhejiang Shuren University, Hangzhou, ChinaNHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, CAMS, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, ChinaDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, ChinaShulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Hangzhou, ChinaSchool of Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, ChinaDingXiang Clinics, Hangzhou, ChinaNHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, CAMS, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, ChinaDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, ChinaNHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, CAMS, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, ChinaDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, ChinaShulan International Medical College, Zhejiang Shuren University, Hangzhou, ChinaNHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, CAMS, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, ChinaKey Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, ChinaShulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Hangzhou, ChinaDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, ChinaAimTo investigate the interactions between the graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GWRWR) and other risk factors responsible for inferior allograft outcomes.MethodsA total of 362 patients who received liver transplantation (LT) were enrolled. Indicators such as graft/recipient weight and other prognostic factors were collected. Comparisons of indicators and survival analysis were performed in groups categorized by the GWRWR. Interactions of large-for-size grafts (LFSGs) with graft macrosteatosis (MaS) were evaluated in terms of relative excess risk caused by interaction (RERI) and attributable proportion (AP). Cytoscape visualized the role of LFSGs in the risk profile for poor prognosis.ResultsBased on the GWRWR, LT cases can be categorized into three subgroups, standard (1%–2.5%), optimal (2.5%–3.0%), and inferior prognosis (>3.0%). Survival analysis confirmed clear separations in cases categorized by the above-defined limits on the GWRWR (P < 0.05). LFSGs caused inferior prognosis by initiating positive interactions with MaS severity.ConclusionThe GWRWR exerted nonlinear effects on prognosis in deceased donor LT cases. LFSGs (GWRWR > 3.0%) caused inferior outcomes, while grafts sized within (2.5%–3.0%) had optimal post-transplant prognosis. MaS increased the risk of poor prognosis by exerting positive synergistic effects on LFSGs.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1075845/fullGWRWRprognosisgraft failureliver transplantationmacrosteatosis
spellingShingle Zhengtao Liu
Zhengtao Liu
Zhengtao Liu
Zhengtao Liu
Jingting Lyu
Xiang Li
Xiang Li
Lu Yu
Lu Yu
Shuping Que
Jun Xu
Jun Xu
Lei Geng
Lei Geng
Shusen Zheng
Shusen Zheng
Shusen Zheng
Shusen Zheng
Shusen Zheng
Graft-to-recipient weight ratio exerts nonlinear effects on prognosis by interacting with donor liver macrosteatosis
Frontiers in Surgery
GWRWR
prognosis
graft failure
liver transplantation
macrosteatosis
title Graft-to-recipient weight ratio exerts nonlinear effects on prognosis by interacting with donor liver macrosteatosis
title_full Graft-to-recipient weight ratio exerts nonlinear effects on prognosis by interacting with donor liver macrosteatosis
title_fullStr Graft-to-recipient weight ratio exerts nonlinear effects on prognosis by interacting with donor liver macrosteatosis
title_full_unstemmed Graft-to-recipient weight ratio exerts nonlinear effects on prognosis by interacting with donor liver macrosteatosis
title_short Graft-to-recipient weight ratio exerts nonlinear effects on prognosis by interacting with donor liver macrosteatosis
title_sort graft to recipient weight ratio exerts nonlinear effects on prognosis by interacting with donor liver macrosteatosis
topic GWRWR
prognosis
graft failure
liver transplantation
macrosteatosis
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1075845/full
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengtaoliu grafttorecipientweightratioexertsnonlineareffectsonprognosisbyinteractingwithdonorlivermacrosteatosis
AT zhengtaoliu grafttorecipientweightratioexertsnonlineareffectsonprognosisbyinteractingwithdonorlivermacrosteatosis
AT zhengtaoliu grafttorecipientweightratioexertsnonlineareffectsonprognosisbyinteractingwithdonorlivermacrosteatosis
AT zhengtaoliu grafttorecipientweightratioexertsnonlineareffectsonprognosisbyinteractingwithdonorlivermacrosteatosis
AT jingtinglyu grafttorecipientweightratioexertsnonlineareffectsonprognosisbyinteractingwithdonorlivermacrosteatosis
AT xiangli grafttorecipientweightratioexertsnonlineareffectsonprognosisbyinteractingwithdonorlivermacrosteatosis
AT xiangli grafttorecipientweightratioexertsnonlineareffectsonprognosisbyinteractingwithdonorlivermacrosteatosis
AT luyu grafttorecipientweightratioexertsnonlineareffectsonprognosisbyinteractingwithdonorlivermacrosteatosis
AT luyu grafttorecipientweightratioexertsnonlineareffectsonprognosisbyinteractingwithdonorlivermacrosteatosis
AT shupingque grafttorecipientweightratioexertsnonlineareffectsonprognosisbyinteractingwithdonorlivermacrosteatosis
AT junxu grafttorecipientweightratioexertsnonlineareffectsonprognosisbyinteractingwithdonorlivermacrosteatosis
AT junxu grafttorecipientweightratioexertsnonlineareffectsonprognosisbyinteractingwithdonorlivermacrosteatosis
AT leigeng grafttorecipientweightratioexertsnonlineareffectsonprognosisbyinteractingwithdonorlivermacrosteatosis
AT leigeng grafttorecipientweightratioexertsnonlineareffectsonprognosisbyinteractingwithdonorlivermacrosteatosis
AT shusenzheng grafttorecipientweightratioexertsnonlineareffectsonprognosisbyinteractingwithdonorlivermacrosteatosis
AT shusenzheng grafttorecipientweightratioexertsnonlineareffectsonprognosisbyinteractingwithdonorlivermacrosteatosis
AT shusenzheng grafttorecipientweightratioexertsnonlineareffectsonprognosisbyinteractingwithdonorlivermacrosteatosis
AT shusenzheng grafttorecipientweightratioexertsnonlineareffectsonprognosisbyinteractingwithdonorlivermacrosteatosis
AT shusenzheng grafttorecipientweightratioexertsnonlineareffectsonprognosisbyinteractingwithdonorlivermacrosteatosis