Reflective and feedback performances on Thai medical students’ patient history-taking skills
Abstract Background Reflective practice (RP) plays a crucial role in encouraging learners to think critically and consciously about their performances. Providing constructive feedback can further enhance RP. But non-Western learners might face different learning barriers compared to learners in the...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2019-05-01
|
| Series: | BMC Medical Education |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-019-1585-z |
| _version_ | 1818791606972579840 |
|---|---|
| author | Weeratian Tawanwongsri Tharin Phenwan |
| author_facet | Weeratian Tawanwongsri Tharin Phenwan |
| author_sort | Weeratian Tawanwongsri |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background Reflective practice (RP) plays a crucial role in encouraging learners to think critically and consciously about their performances. Providing constructive feedback can further enhance RP. But non-Western learners might face different learning barriers compared to learners in the West, where RP originated. Methods In this retrospective study, we assessed RP and feedback performances on Thai medical students’ patient history-taking skills. We applied RP and peer feedback, along with feedback from the instructors, during the history-taking sessions of the ten-week introduction course for fourth-year medical students. Twelve history-taking sessions were used for the analysis. Two instructors assessed students’ reflective performance and categorised them into one of the six stages of Gibbs’ reflective cycle; their feedback performances were analysed using Pendleton’s model. We investigated the correlations between students’ overall grade point average (GPAX) and patient history-taking scores on the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Students’ opinions of the RP teaching method were also collected. Results All (n = 48) students participated in our study. The students’ mean age was 21.2 ± 0.5 years. The majority of the students were female (64.6%). The data indicated that 33 and 4% of the participants were categorised into the evaluation stage and action plan stage of Gibbs’ reflective cycle, respectively. In addition, 22 and 15% of the participants were able to state what their peers did well and suggest how peers could improve their skills, respectively. All students passed the minimum passing level of four history-taking OSCE stations. Participants agreed that RP was a useful tool (mean 9.0, SD 0.1), which enhanced their thought processes (mean 8.4, SD 0.2) and future performances (mean 8.2, SD 0.2). However, there was no correlation between the students’ highest Gibbs’ reflection levels and their history-taking OSCE scores. Conclusions RP, together with feedback, proved to be a useful technique to help fourth-year Thai medical students improve their reflection skills, enhance their medical knowledge, and improve patient history-taking skills. Further study with longer monitoring is required to further explore negative and positive influential factors affecting students’ achievement of better reflection performances. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-18T15:14:02Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-4d6b5f9cb665497e95651adfddff0185 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1472-6920 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-18T15:14:02Z |
| publishDate | 2019-05-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Medical Education |
| spelling | doaj.art-4d6b5f9cb665497e95651adfddff01852022-12-21T21:03:35ZengBMCBMC Medical Education1472-69202019-05-011911810.1186/s12909-019-1585-zReflective and feedback performances on Thai medical students’ patient history-taking skillsWeeratian Tawanwongsri0Tharin Phenwan1School of Medicine, Walailak UniversitySchool of Medicine, Walailak UniversityAbstract Background Reflective practice (RP) plays a crucial role in encouraging learners to think critically and consciously about their performances. Providing constructive feedback can further enhance RP. But non-Western learners might face different learning barriers compared to learners in the West, where RP originated. Methods In this retrospective study, we assessed RP and feedback performances on Thai medical students’ patient history-taking skills. We applied RP and peer feedback, along with feedback from the instructors, during the history-taking sessions of the ten-week introduction course for fourth-year medical students. Twelve history-taking sessions were used for the analysis. Two instructors assessed students’ reflective performance and categorised them into one of the six stages of Gibbs’ reflective cycle; their feedback performances were analysed using Pendleton’s model. We investigated the correlations between students’ overall grade point average (GPAX) and patient history-taking scores on the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Students’ opinions of the RP teaching method were also collected. Results All (n = 48) students participated in our study. The students’ mean age was 21.2 ± 0.5 years. The majority of the students were female (64.6%). The data indicated that 33 and 4% of the participants were categorised into the evaluation stage and action plan stage of Gibbs’ reflective cycle, respectively. In addition, 22 and 15% of the participants were able to state what their peers did well and suggest how peers could improve their skills, respectively. All students passed the minimum passing level of four history-taking OSCE stations. Participants agreed that RP was a useful tool (mean 9.0, SD 0.1), which enhanced their thought processes (mean 8.4, SD 0.2) and future performances (mean 8.2, SD 0.2). However, there was no correlation between the students’ highest Gibbs’ reflection levels and their history-taking OSCE scores. Conclusions RP, together with feedback, proved to be a useful technique to help fourth-year Thai medical students improve their reflection skills, enhance their medical knowledge, and improve patient history-taking skills. Further study with longer monitoring is required to further explore negative and positive influential factors affecting students’ achievement of better reflection performances.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-019-1585-zReflective practiceFeedbackHistory takingThai |
| spellingShingle | Weeratian Tawanwongsri Tharin Phenwan Reflective and feedback performances on Thai medical students’ patient history-taking skills BMC Medical Education Reflective practice Feedback History taking Thai |
| title | Reflective and feedback performances on Thai medical students’ patient history-taking skills |
| title_full | Reflective and feedback performances on Thai medical students’ patient history-taking skills |
| title_fullStr | Reflective and feedback performances on Thai medical students’ patient history-taking skills |
| title_full_unstemmed | Reflective and feedback performances on Thai medical students’ patient history-taking skills |
| title_short | Reflective and feedback performances on Thai medical students’ patient history-taking skills |
| title_sort | reflective and feedback performances on thai medical students patient history taking skills |
| topic | Reflective practice Feedback History taking Thai |
| url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-019-1585-z |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT weeratiantawanwongsri reflectiveandfeedbackperformancesonthaimedicalstudentspatienthistorytakingskills AT tharinphenwan reflectiveandfeedbackperformancesonthaimedicalstudentspatienthistorytakingskills |