Influence of cuff stiffness on hemodynamics and perceived cuff pressure in the upper extremities in males and females: implications for practical blood flow restriction training

Abstract Background Practical blood flow restriction (pBFR) during exercise is a cost-saving alternative to traditional blood flow restriction using pneumatic cuffs, particularly when exercising in a group setting. Depending on the pBFR technique, several factors (e.g., cuff width, limb circumferenc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robert Bielitzki, Tom Behrendt, Toan Nguyen, Martin Behrens, Victoria Malczewski, Alexander Franz, Lutz Schega
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-10-01
Series:BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-023-00745-w
_version_ 1797557292674056192
author Robert Bielitzki
Tom Behrendt
Toan Nguyen
Martin Behrens
Victoria Malczewski
Alexander Franz
Lutz Schega
author_facet Robert Bielitzki
Tom Behrendt
Toan Nguyen
Martin Behrens
Victoria Malczewski
Alexander Franz
Lutz Schega
author_sort Robert Bielitzki
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Practical blood flow restriction (pBFR) during exercise is a cost-saving alternative to traditional blood flow restriction using pneumatic cuffs, particularly when exercising in a group setting. Depending on the pBFR technique, several factors (e.g., cuff width, limb circumference) have already been shown to be of importance when applying the pBFR pressure. Given that elastic cuffs are often used for pBFR, the cuff stiffness might be an additional influencing factor. Therefore, the present study compared the acute effects of three elastic cuffs with identical width but different stiffness (high stiffness (HS), medium stiffness (MS), and low stiffness (LS)) on hemodynamic measures and perceived cuff pressure at rest. Methods In a randomized, counter-balanced cross-over study, 36 young and normotensive participants completed three experimental trials. After a 10-min rest period in supine position, the cuff was loosely and proximally applied to the right upper arm. Following baseline data recording, the cuff was successively tightened in 10%-increments with respect to the limb circumference (%overlap) until arterial blood flow was occluded. At baseline and during each %overlap, systolic peak blood flow velocity of the brachial artery, rating of perceived cuff pressure, as well as muscle oxygen saturation and total hemoglobin concentration of the biceps brachii muscle were recorded. Results The %overlap required to occlude arterial blood flow was different between the three cuffs (HS: 30.9 ± 3.8%, MS: 43.9 ± 6.1%, LS: 54.5 ± 8.3%). Furthermore, at 30% overlap, systolic peak blood flow velocity was lower when applying the HS (9.0 ± 10.9 cm∙s− 1) compared to MS (48.9 ± 21.9 cm∙s− 1) and LS cuff (62.9 ± 19.1 cm∙s− 1). Rating of perceived cuff pressure at 30% overlap was higher when using the HS (6.5 ± 1.5 arbitrary unit (a.u.)) compared to MS (5.1 ± 1.4 a.u.) and LS cuff (4.9 ± 1.5 a.u.) with no difference between the MS and LS cuff. However, muscle oxygen saturation and total hemoglobin concentration were not different between the three cuffs. Conclusions The present study revealed that the cuff stiffness influenced blood flow velocity and arterial occlusion pressure. Therefore, cuff stiffness seems an important factor for the application of pBFR.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T17:15:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4d812d0e46274900b75d102b47b1275a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2052-1847
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T17:15:08Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
spelling doaj.art-4d812d0e46274900b75d102b47b1275a2023-11-20T10:30:59ZengBMCBMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation2052-18472023-10-0115111010.1186/s13102-023-00745-wInfluence of cuff stiffness on hemodynamics and perceived cuff pressure in the upper extremities in males and females: implications for practical blood flow restriction trainingRobert Bielitzki0Tom Behrendt1Toan Nguyen2Martin Behrens3Victoria Malczewski4Alexander Franz5Lutz Schega6Department of Sport Science, Institute III, Otto-von-Guericke University MagdeburgDepartment of Sport Science, Institute III, Otto-von-Guericke University MagdeburgDepartment of Sport Science, Institute III, Otto-von-Guericke University MagdeburgUniversity of Applied Sciences for Sport and Management PotsdamDepartment of Sport Science, Institute III, Otto-von-Guericke University MagdeburgDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital BonnDepartment of Sport Science, Institute III, Otto-von-Guericke University MagdeburgAbstract Background Practical blood flow restriction (pBFR) during exercise is a cost-saving alternative to traditional blood flow restriction using pneumatic cuffs, particularly when exercising in a group setting. Depending on the pBFR technique, several factors (e.g., cuff width, limb circumference) have already been shown to be of importance when applying the pBFR pressure. Given that elastic cuffs are often used for pBFR, the cuff stiffness might be an additional influencing factor. Therefore, the present study compared the acute effects of three elastic cuffs with identical width but different stiffness (high stiffness (HS), medium stiffness (MS), and low stiffness (LS)) on hemodynamic measures and perceived cuff pressure at rest. Methods In a randomized, counter-balanced cross-over study, 36 young and normotensive participants completed three experimental trials. After a 10-min rest period in supine position, the cuff was loosely and proximally applied to the right upper arm. Following baseline data recording, the cuff was successively tightened in 10%-increments with respect to the limb circumference (%overlap) until arterial blood flow was occluded. At baseline and during each %overlap, systolic peak blood flow velocity of the brachial artery, rating of perceived cuff pressure, as well as muscle oxygen saturation and total hemoglobin concentration of the biceps brachii muscle were recorded. Results The %overlap required to occlude arterial blood flow was different between the three cuffs (HS: 30.9 ± 3.8%, MS: 43.9 ± 6.1%, LS: 54.5 ± 8.3%). Furthermore, at 30% overlap, systolic peak blood flow velocity was lower when applying the HS (9.0 ± 10.9 cm∙s− 1) compared to MS (48.9 ± 21.9 cm∙s− 1) and LS cuff (62.9 ± 19.1 cm∙s− 1). Rating of perceived cuff pressure at 30% overlap was higher when using the HS (6.5 ± 1.5 arbitrary unit (a.u.)) compared to MS (5.1 ± 1.4 a.u.) and LS cuff (4.9 ± 1.5 a.u.) with no difference between the MS and LS cuff. However, muscle oxygen saturation and total hemoglobin concentration were not different between the three cuffs. Conclusions The present study revealed that the cuff stiffness influenced blood flow velocity and arterial occlusion pressure. Therefore, cuff stiffness seems an important factor for the application of pBFR.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-023-00745-wVascular occlusionElastic wrapBlood flow velocityMuscle oxygenationPerceptual responsesNIRS
spellingShingle Robert Bielitzki
Tom Behrendt
Toan Nguyen
Martin Behrens
Victoria Malczewski
Alexander Franz
Lutz Schega
Influence of cuff stiffness on hemodynamics and perceived cuff pressure in the upper extremities in males and females: implications for practical blood flow restriction training
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
Vascular occlusion
Elastic wrap
Blood flow velocity
Muscle oxygenation
Perceptual responses
NIRS
title Influence of cuff stiffness on hemodynamics and perceived cuff pressure in the upper extremities in males and females: implications for practical blood flow restriction training
title_full Influence of cuff stiffness on hemodynamics and perceived cuff pressure in the upper extremities in males and females: implications for practical blood flow restriction training
title_fullStr Influence of cuff stiffness on hemodynamics and perceived cuff pressure in the upper extremities in males and females: implications for practical blood flow restriction training
title_full_unstemmed Influence of cuff stiffness on hemodynamics and perceived cuff pressure in the upper extremities in males and females: implications for practical blood flow restriction training
title_short Influence of cuff stiffness on hemodynamics and perceived cuff pressure in the upper extremities in males and females: implications for practical blood flow restriction training
title_sort influence of cuff stiffness on hemodynamics and perceived cuff pressure in the upper extremities in males and females implications for practical blood flow restriction training
topic Vascular occlusion
Elastic wrap
Blood flow velocity
Muscle oxygenation
Perceptual responses
NIRS
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-023-00745-w
work_keys_str_mv AT robertbielitzki influenceofcuffstiffnessonhemodynamicsandperceivedcuffpressureintheupperextremitiesinmalesandfemalesimplicationsforpracticalbloodflowrestrictiontraining
AT tombehrendt influenceofcuffstiffnessonhemodynamicsandperceivedcuffpressureintheupperextremitiesinmalesandfemalesimplicationsforpracticalbloodflowrestrictiontraining
AT toannguyen influenceofcuffstiffnessonhemodynamicsandperceivedcuffpressureintheupperextremitiesinmalesandfemalesimplicationsforpracticalbloodflowrestrictiontraining
AT martinbehrens influenceofcuffstiffnessonhemodynamicsandperceivedcuffpressureintheupperextremitiesinmalesandfemalesimplicationsforpracticalbloodflowrestrictiontraining
AT victoriamalczewski influenceofcuffstiffnessonhemodynamicsandperceivedcuffpressureintheupperextremitiesinmalesandfemalesimplicationsforpracticalbloodflowrestrictiontraining
AT alexanderfranz influenceofcuffstiffnessonhemodynamicsandperceivedcuffpressureintheupperextremitiesinmalesandfemalesimplicationsforpracticalbloodflowrestrictiontraining
AT lutzschega influenceofcuffstiffnessonhemodynamicsandperceivedcuffpressureintheupperextremitiesinmalesandfemalesimplicationsforpracticalbloodflowrestrictiontraining