Il carisma nella sociologia weberiana della leadership

The key issue of leadership in the democratic process reflects different perspectives that affect the relationship between legitimacy and power, the perspective of a “prejudice” towards leadership due to the excessive concentration of power, and the types of trust and linkage that the leader can act...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lorenzo Viviani
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Firenze University Press 2020-01-01
Series:SocietàMutamentoPolitica: Rivista Italiana di Sociologia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/smp/article/view/11045
_version_ 1811264263028736000
author Lorenzo Viviani
author_facet Lorenzo Viviani
author_sort Lorenzo Viviani
collection DOAJ
description The key issue of leadership in the democratic process reflects different perspectives that affect the relationship between legitimacy and power, the perspective of a “prejudice” towards leadership due to the excessive concentration of power, and the types of trust and linkage that the leader can activate in the processes of personalization of politics, within, beyond, against or notwithstanding political parties. The purpose of the paper is to investigate the different paths and the different role of leadership in the transformation from party democracy to leader democracy on the celebration of the hundred years since Weber’s 1919 lecture “Politik als Beruf”. Regarding this topic, we consider the concept of plebiscitarism, the different ways in which this process develops, and the relationship between leadership, charisma and democracy in contemporary societies. In order to explore this research field it is necessary to consider the key role of charisma in the Weberian sociological work, not only in reference to the sociology of power, but starting from the relationship between disenchantment and bureaucratization in Western rationalization. The clarification of these concepts is far from nominalistic considering that they point out the different substance that plebiscitary disintermediation assumes in the relationship between leadership and democracy. Just this is the premise that allows distinguishing the difference between the personalization in liberal-democracies, the charismatic personalization and the populist personalization. Although a large part of the literature on populism tends to equate the populist leadership with the charismatic one, there is however a more recent questioning of the overlapping of the two phenomena. The paper aims to analyse the Weberian theory of charisma and to answer the question of whether charisma still has a chance in hyper-rationalized contemporary societies. Moreover, if the charisma requires a higher quality, who can be defined as a charismatic leader today?
first_indexed 2024-04-12T20:00:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4d8d0c7cfb384889b15b927fc495e9ce
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2038-3150
language deu
last_indexed 2024-04-12T20:00:04Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Firenze University Press
record_format Article
series SocietàMutamentoPolitica: Rivista Italiana di Sociologia
spelling doaj.art-4d8d0c7cfb384889b15b927fc495e9ce2022-12-22T03:18:33ZdeuFirenze University PressSocietàMutamentoPolitica: Rivista Italiana di Sociologia2038-31502020-01-01102010.13128/smp-11045Il carisma nella sociologia weberiana della leadershipLorenzo VivianiThe key issue of leadership in the democratic process reflects different perspectives that affect the relationship between legitimacy and power, the perspective of a “prejudice” towards leadership due to the excessive concentration of power, and the types of trust and linkage that the leader can activate in the processes of personalization of politics, within, beyond, against or notwithstanding political parties. The purpose of the paper is to investigate the different paths and the different role of leadership in the transformation from party democracy to leader democracy on the celebration of the hundred years since Weber’s 1919 lecture “Politik als Beruf”. Regarding this topic, we consider the concept of plebiscitarism, the different ways in which this process develops, and the relationship between leadership, charisma and democracy in contemporary societies. In order to explore this research field it is necessary to consider the key role of charisma in the Weberian sociological work, not only in reference to the sociology of power, but starting from the relationship between disenchantment and bureaucratization in Western rationalization. The clarification of these concepts is far from nominalistic considering that they point out the different substance that plebiscitary disintermediation assumes in the relationship between leadership and democracy. Just this is the premise that allows distinguishing the difference between the personalization in liberal-democracies, the charismatic personalization and the populist personalization. Although a large part of the literature on populism tends to equate the populist leadership with the charismatic one, there is however a more recent questioning of the overlapping of the two phenomena. The paper aims to analyse the Weberian theory of charisma and to answer the question of whether charisma still has a chance in hyper-rationalized contemporary societies. Moreover, if the charisma requires a higher quality, who can be defined as a charismatic leader today?https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/smp/article/view/11045Max WeberLeadershipCharismaRationalizationLeader DemocracyPopulism
spellingShingle Lorenzo Viviani
Il carisma nella sociologia weberiana della leadership
SocietàMutamentoPolitica: Rivista Italiana di Sociologia
Max Weber
Leadership
Charisma
Rationalization
Leader Democracy
Populism
title Il carisma nella sociologia weberiana della leadership
title_full Il carisma nella sociologia weberiana della leadership
title_fullStr Il carisma nella sociologia weberiana della leadership
title_full_unstemmed Il carisma nella sociologia weberiana della leadership
title_short Il carisma nella sociologia weberiana della leadership
title_sort il carisma nella sociologia weberiana della leadership
topic Max Weber
Leadership
Charisma
Rationalization
Leader Democracy
Populism
url https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/smp/article/view/11045
work_keys_str_mv AT lorenzoviviani ilcarismanellasociologiaweberianadellaleadership