ONTOLOGICAL AND CONTEXTUAL POSITION OF TIME: BETWEEN AEON AND RETARDATIONS OF NOTHING
Research on the negative foundations of time will not lose its relevance as long as the connection, stated by M. Heidegger in 1927, remains legitimate and systemically justified. Sein und Zeit do not look like the classical opposition of being and thinking, being and phenomenon, being and existence,...
Main Author: | Darya A. Zakhlypa |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Publishing
2020-06-01
|
Series: | Вісник Харківського національного університету імені В.Н. Каразіна. Серія Філософія, філософські перипетії |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://periodicals.karazin.ua/philosophy/article/view/16233/15255 |
Similar Items
-
MAN BETWEEN “ALL” AND “NOTHING”
by: E. F. Kazakov
Published: (2015-11-01) -
Ontological Pluralism and Ontological Category
by: Ataollah Hashemi, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
Aristotle on Ontological Pluralism
by: Mohammad Hossein Esfandiari, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01) -
Anselms Proslogion, “nichts” gegen Nishida und Heidegger
by: Manfred GAWLINA
Published: (2013-12-01) -
Basic Role of Time in Heidegger's Ontological Interpretation of Kant
by: Ali Aghaeepour, et al.
Published: (2021-12-01)