Identifying and prioritising the key components of a Quality Improvement Network for allied health professionals and psychological therapists: a group concept mapping project

Introduction Despite growing enthusiasm for quality improvement (QI), the complexities of modern healthcare continue to create gaps in our ability to consistently deliver the most effective and efficient care for patients, and improvement activities often fail to achieve widespread uptake even when...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kate L Hackett, Lisa J Robinson, Hannah V Butler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2023-03-01
Series:BMJ Open Quality
Online Access:https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/12/1/e002039.full
_version_ 1826912315182678016
author Kate L Hackett
Lisa J Robinson
Hannah V Butler
author_facet Kate L Hackett
Lisa J Robinson
Hannah V Butler
author_sort Kate L Hackett
collection DOAJ
description Introduction Despite growing enthusiasm for quality improvement (QI), the complexities of modern healthcare continue to create gaps in our ability to consistently deliver the most effective and efficient care for patients, and improvement activities often fail to achieve widespread uptake even when there is robust evidence of their benefits.Methods We undertook a novel, mixed methods evaluation and planning project using group concept mapping (GCM) methodology to identify and prioritise the ways in which our recently established Quality Improvement Network (QIN) could support allied health professionals, psychological therapists and administrative staff in their daily work to improve patient outcomes and experience. Mid-level leaders across our therapy services department contributed towards a statement generation activity and individually sorted these statements into themes. Each statement was rated for perceived importance and current success. Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis were applied to the sorted data to produce themed clusters of ideas within concept maps. Priority values were applied to these maps to identify key areas for future QIN activity.Results Overall, 34 participants took part in ideas generation, 20 in sorting and 30 in the rating activity. A five-item cluster map was agreed on, containing the following named clusters: data support; practical skills and training; time and resources; embedding a QI culture; and sharing ideas and working together. Statements contained within each of the five clusters highlight the importance of supporting a range of activities spanning the technical and human aspects of QI at an individual, group/team, organisation and wider systems level.Conclusion GCM provided a structured and systematic approach for identifying the perceived support needs of allied health professionals, psychological therapists and administrative support staff in relation to QI. The findings from this project provide a useful benchmark from which to track targeted QI support in an applied healthcare setting.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T18:55:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4da175aff880428089485ac514ec76db
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2399-6641
language English
last_indexed 2025-02-17T10:27:24Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open Quality
spelling doaj.art-4da175aff880428089485ac514ec76db2024-12-31T11:55:09ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open Quality2399-66412023-03-0112110.1136/bmjoq-2022-002039Identifying and prioritising the key components of a Quality Improvement Network for allied health professionals and psychological therapists: a group concept mapping projectKate L Hackett0Lisa J Robinson1Hannah V Butler2Department of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UKRehabilitation Department, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UKRehabilitation Department, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UKIntroduction Despite growing enthusiasm for quality improvement (QI), the complexities of modern healthcare continue to create gaps in our ability to consistently deliver the most effective and efficient care for patients, and improvement activities often fail to achieve widespread uptake even when there is robust evidence of their benefits.Methods We undertook a novel, mixed methods evaluation and planning project using group concept mapping (GCM) methodology to identify and prioritise the ways in which our recently established Quality Improvement Network (QIN) could support allied health professionals, psychological therapists and administrative staff in their daily work to improve patient outcomes and experience. Mid-level leaders across our therapy services department contributed towards a statement generation activity and individually sorted these statements into themes. Each statement was rated for perceived importance and current success. Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis were applied to the sorted data to produce themed clusters of ideas within concept maps. Priority values were applied to these maps to identify key areas for future QIN activity.Results Overall, 34 participants took part in ideas generation, 20 in sorting and 30 in the rating activity. A five-item cluster map was agreed on, containing the following named clusters: data support; practical skills and training; time and resources; embedding a QI culture; and sharing ideas and working together. Statements contained within each of the five clusters highlight the importance of supporting a range of activities spanning the technical and human aspects of QI at an individual, group/team, organisation and wider systems level.Conclusion GCM provided a structured and systematic approach for identifying the perceived support needs of allied health professionals, psychological therapists and administrative support staff in relation to QI. The findings from this project provide a useful benchmark from which to track targeted QI support in an applied healthcare setting.https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/12/1/e002039.full
spellingShingle Kate L Hackett
Lisa J Robinson
Hannah V Butler
Identifying and prioritising the key components of a Quality Improvement Network for allied health professionals and psychological therapists: a group concept mapping project
BMJ Open Quality
title Identifying and prioritising the key components of a Quality Improvement Network for allied health professionals and psychological therapists: a group concept mapping project
title_full Identifying and prioritising the key components of a Quality Improvement Network for allied health professionals and psychological therapists: a group concept mapping project
title_fullStr Identifying and prioritising the key components of a Quality Improvement Network for allied health professionals and psychological therapists: a group concept mapping project
title_full_unstemmed Identifying and prioritising the key components of a Quality Improvement Network for allied health professionals and psychological therapists: a group concept mapping project
title_short Identifying and prioritising the key components of a Quality Improvement Network for allied health professionals and psychological therapists: a group concept mapping project
title_sort identifying and prioritising the key components of a quality improvement network for allied health professionals and psychological therapists a group concept mapping project
url https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/12/1/e002039.full
work_keys_str_mv AT katelhackett identifyingandprioritisingthekeycomponentsofaqualityimprovementnetworkforalliedhealthprofessionalsandpsychologicaltherapistsagroupconceptmappingproject
AT lisajrobinson identifyingandprioritisingthekeycomponentsofaqualityimprovementnetworkforalliedhealthprofessionalsandpsychologicaltherapistsagroupconceptmappingproject
AT hannahvbutler identifyingandprioritisingthekeycomponentsofaqualityimprovementnetworkforalliedhealthprofessionalsandpsychologicaltherapistsagroupconceptmappingproject