Relationship between poultry biosecurity assessments and Escherichia coli prevalence in poultry farms

A crucial first step in preventing the introduction and spread of harmful microorganisms in poultry farms is biosecurity. The objectives of this investigation were to assess biosecurity measures and the prevalence of different E. coli species in commercial chicken farms in Sharkia province, Egypt....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mahmoud S. Zaki, Hanan A. Fahmy, Mariam H.A. Khedr, Mai A.A. Goha, Amira S.A. Attia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Assiut University 2024-03-01
Series:Journal of Advanced Veterinary Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.advetresearch.com/index.php/AVR/article/view/1561
_version_ 1797267244062867456
author Mahmoud S. Zaki
Hanan A. Fahmy
Mariam H.A. Khedr
Mai A.A. Goha
Amira S.A. Attia
author_facet Mahmoud S. Zaki
Hanan A. Fahmy
Mariam H.A. Khedr
Mai A.A. Goha
Amira S.A. Attia
author_sort Mahmoud S. Zaki
collection DOAJ
description A crucial first step in preventing the introduction and spread of harmful microorganisms in poultry farms is biosecurity. The objectives of this investigation were to assess biosecurity measures and the prevalence of different E. coli species in commercial chicken farms in Sharkia province, Egypt. Sensitivity of E. coli strains was identified, and their susceptibility to antibiotics and disinfection was evaluated as well. Four farms provided 21 samples each, for a total of 84 samples. Three samples of each were collected for water, feed, litter, cloaca, wall, hand, and foot boots. All the studied farms obtained a "poor biosecurity" grade, meaning that their overall biosecurity score, which is comprised of 40% external and 36.54% internal biosecurity, was less than 50%. Escherichia coli species were found in 79.76% of the samples. It was isolated from water, feed, litter, cloaca, walls, hands, and foot boots with percentages of 91.6; 83.3; 91.6; 100; 58.3; 58.3 and 75%, respectively. Biosecurity level had significant negative correlations with the isolated E. coil species. Escherichia coli O119 was the most common serotype in litter and the cloaca, while E. coli O1 was the most prevalent serotype in walls and hands. Additionally, serotypes for E. coli O26, O159, O128 and O78 were included. According to the patterns of antibiotic sensitivity, amikacin, nitrofurantoin, gentamycin, and levofloxacin showed intermediate sensitivity, whereas E. coli O119 bacteria were highly sensitive to ciprofloxacin. In the absence and presence of organic matter, Virocid, Cid 2000 and finally Virkon S were the most efficient against E. coli O119. According to this study, there were differences in the investigated farms' biosecurity levels in relation to the occurrence of Escherichia coli. To reduce the introduction and persistence of E. coli in poultry farms, several biosecurity practices and management, including stringent cleaning and disinfection measures should be applied.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T14:01:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4dc1807627974d34bb7da07438710d83
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2090-6269
2090-6277
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-25T01:13:30Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Assiut University
record_format Article
series Journal of Advanced Veterinary Research
spelling doaj.art-4dc1807627974d34bb7da07438710d832024-03-10T05:05:13ZengAssiut UniversityJournal of Advanced Veterinary Research2090-62692090-62772024-03-01143Relationship between poultry biosecurity assessments and Escherichia coli prevalence in poultry farmsMahmoud S. Zaki0Hanan A. Fahmy1Mariam H.A. Khedr2Mai A.A. Goha3Amira S.A. Attia4Department of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt.Researcher and Environmental Affairs, Animal Health Research Institute (AHRI), Agriculture Research Centre (ARC), Dokki, Giza, Egypt.Department of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt.Department of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt.Department of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt. A crucial first step in preventing the introduction and spread of harmful microorganisms in poultry farms is biosecurity. The objectives of this investigation were to assess biosecurity measures and the prevalence of different E. coli species in commercial chicken farms in Sharkia province, Egypt. Sensitivity of E. coli strains was identified, and their susceptibility to antibiotics and disinfection was evaluated as well. Four farms provided 21 samples each, for a total of 84 samples. Three samples of each were collected for water, feed, litter, cloaca, wall, hand, and foot boots. All the studied farms obtained a "poor biosecurity" grade, meaning that their overall biosecurity score, which is comprised of 40% external and 36.54% internal biosecurity, was less than 50%. Escherichia coli species were found in 79.76% of the samples. It was isolated from water, feed, litter, cloaca, walls, hands, and foot boots with percentages of 91.6; 83.3; 91.6; 100; 58.3; 58.3 and 75%, respectively. Biosecurity level had significant negative correlations with the isolated E. coil species. Escherichia coli O119 was the most common serotype in litter and the cloaca, while E. coli O1 was the most prevalent serotype in walls and hands. Additionally, serotypes for E. coli O26, O159, O128 and O78 were included. According to the patterns of antibiotic sensitivity, amikacin, nitrofurantoin, gentamycin, and levofloxacin showed intermediate sensitivity, whereas E. coli O119 bacteria were highly sensitive to ciprofloxacin. In the absence and presence of organic matter, Virocid, Cid 2000 and finally Virkon S were the most efficient against E. coli O119. According to this study, there were differences in the investigated farms' biosecurity levels in relation to the occurrence of Escherichia coli. To reduce the introduction and persistence of E. coli in poultry farms, several biosecurity practices and management, including stringent cleaning and disinfection measures should be applied. https://www.advetresearch.com/index.php/AVR/article/view/1561Escherichia coli Biosecurity Antibiotics Disinfectants
spellingShingle Mahmoud S. Zaki
Hanan A. Fahmy
Mariam H.A. Khedr
Mai A.A. Goha
Amira S.A. Attia
Relationship between poultry biosecurity assessments and Escherichia coli prevalence in poultry farms
Journal of Advanced Veterinary Research
Escherichia coli
Biosecurity
Antibiotics
Disinfectants
title Relationship between poultry biosecurity assessments and Escherichia coli prevalence in poultry farms
title_full Relationship between poultry biosecurity assessments and Escherichia coli prevalence in poultry farms
title_fullStr Relationship between poultry biosecurity assessments and Escherichia coli prevalence in poultry farms
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between poultry biosecurity assessments and Escherichia coli prevalence in poultry farms
title_short Relationship between poultry biosecurity assessments and Escherichia coli prevalence in poultry farms
title_sort relationship between poultry biosecurity assessments and escherichia coli prevalence in poultry farms
topic Escherichia coli
Biosecurity
Antibiotics
Disinfectants
url https://www.advetresearch.com/index.php/AVR/article/view/1561
work_keys_str_mv AT mahmoudszaki relationshipbetweenpoultrybiosecurityassessmentsandescherichiacoliprevalenceinpoultryfarms
AT hananafahmy relationshipbetweenpoultrybiosecurityassessmentsandescherichiacoliprevalenceinpoultryfarms
AT mariamhakhedr relationshipbetweenpoultrybiosecurityassessmentsandescherichiacoliprevalenceinpoultryfarms
AT maiaagoha relationshipbetweenpoultrybiosecurityassessmentsandescherichiacoliprevalenceinpoultryfarms
AT amirasaattia relationshipbetweenpoultrybiosecurityassessmentsandescherichiacoliprevalenceinpoultryfarms